Ultraschall Med 2020; 41(06): 616-617
DOI: 10.1055/a-1271-2986
Editorial

Collateral Effect of the Pandemic on Ultrasound

Nebeneffekte der Pandemie auf den Ultraschall

Authors

  • Stefan Meng

We have been following publications on ultrasound of the lung in patients with COVID 19 with great interest [1] [2] [3]. We also know all the precautionary measures for an ultrasound examination of a patient who has tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. However, this pandemic seems to have an even greater impact on the ultrasound community. As not all patients we see are tested for SARS-CoV-2, we are confronted with additional organizational measures and intensified hygiene protocols in our clinical routine outside the isolation ward. On a daily basis we are reminded that our knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 is still incomplete and that the benefit of some hygienic measures is under debate. Still, the latter are advised or at least recommended from a medicolegal standpoint. In interesting surveys conducted before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the ultrasound decontamination procedures of the ultrasound community were assessed in questionnaires [4] [5]. Regarding surface or endo-cavity ultrasound or interventional procedures, the practice for decontamination was inhomogeneous. Long before this pandemic, some ultrasound societies (e. g. EFSUMB, AIUM) released recommendations for cleaning and disinfecting probes. Nevertheless, we can assume that there were many “different interpretations” of good practice. So maybe this pandemic will lead to a long-term change and improvement of our practice for probe decontamination.



Publication History

Article published online:
08 December 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany