Z Orthop Unfall 2022; 160(03): 324-328
DOI: 10.1055/a-1340-0643
Case Report/Fallbericht

Der seltene Fall einer abriebinduzierten Spätinfektion nach zervikaler Bandscheibenendoprothesenimplantation

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University Medical Centre, Germany
,
Nicolas H. von der Höh
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University Medical Centre, Germany
,
Andreas Dietz
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Leipzig University Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany
,
Catalina Suzana Stingu
3   Institute of Medical Microbiology and Infection Epidemiology, Leipzig University Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany
,
Tanja Gradistanac
4   Institute of Pathology, Leipzig University Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany
,
Jeanette Henkelmann
5   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany
,
Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University Medical Centre, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Zusammenfassung

Abriebinduzierte Komplikationen nach zervikalem Bandscheibenprothesenersatz (C-BSE) sind selten. Hierzu finden sich der Literatur nur vereinzelte Berichte. Wir präsentieren den Fall einer Spätkomplikation nach Implantation von 2 zervikalen Bandscheibenendoprothesen, bei denen es im Verlauf zu ausgedehnten Osteolysen aufgrund eines entzündlichen Geschehens vom infektiösen/abriebinduzierten Mischtyp kam. Die Vorgehensweise und die erzielten Ergebnisse werden gezeigt und auf Grundlage der aktuell verfügbaren Literatur diskutiert.



Publication History

Article published online:
18 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References/Literatur

  • 1 Findlay C, Ayis S, Demetriades AK. Total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review with meta-analysis of data from a total of 3160 patients across 14 randomized controlled trials with both short- and medium- to long-term outcomes. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B: 991-1001
  • 2 Nandyala SV, Marquez-Lara A, Fineberg SJ. et al. Comparison of revision surgeries for one- to two-level cervical TDR and ACDF from 2002 to 2011. Spine J 2014; 14: 2841-2846
  • 3 Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F. et al. Heterotopic ossification following cervical total disc replacement. Spine J 2006; 31: 2802-2806
  • 4 Xia MM, Winder MJ. M6-C cervical disc replacement failure associated with late onset infection. J Spine Surg 2019; 5: 584-588
  • 5 Harris L, Dyson E, Elliot M. et al. Delayed periprosthetic collection after cervical disc arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 13: 1-8
  • 6 Morawietz L, Classen RA, Krenn V. et al. Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membrane. J Clin Pathol 2006; 59: 591-597
  • 7 Reitz H, Joubert MH. Intractable Headache and cervico-brachialgia treated by complete replacement of cervical intervertebral discs with a metal prosthesis. S Afr Med J 1964; 38: 881-884
  • 8 Fernström U. Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprosthesis in herniated disc and painful disc. Acta Chir Scand 1966; 357: 154-159
  • 9 Scholz M, Pingel A, Kandziora F. et al. Künstliche Bandscheibe HWS. Die Wirbelsäule 2018; 02: 309-330
  • 10 Anderson PA, Rouleau JP, Toth JM. et al. A comparison of simulator-tested and -retrieved cervical disc protheses. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 2004; 1: 202-210
  • 11 Lehmann R, Bevevino AJ, Brewer DD. et al. A systematic review of cervical artificial disc replacement wear characteristics and durability. Evid Based Spine Care J 2012; 3 (Suppl. 01) S31-S38 doi:10.1055/s-0031-1298606
  • 12 Hacker FM, Babcock RM, Hacker RJ. Very late complications of cervical arthroplasty: results of 2 controlled randomized prospective studies from a single investigator site. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38: 2223-2226 doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000060
  • 13 Cavanaugh DA, Nunley PD, Kerr EJ. et al. Delayed hyper-reactivity to metal ions after cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: E262-E265
  • 14 Tumialán LM, Gluf WM. Progressive vertebral body osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: E973-E978 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fd863b
  • 15 Veruva SY, Lanman TH, Hanzlik JA. et al. Rare complications of osteolysis and periprosthetic tissue reactions after hybrid and non-hybrid total disc replacement. Eur Spine J 2015; 24 (Suppl. 04) S494-S501 doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3535-0
  • 16 Veruva SY, Lanman TH, Isaza JE. et al. Periprosthetic UHMWPE Wear Debris Induces Inflammation, Vascularization, and Innervation After Total Disc Replacement in the Lumbar Spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475: 1369-1381 doi:10.1007/s11999-016-4996-8
  • 17 Werner JH, Rosenberg JH, Keeley KL. et al. Immunobiology of Periprosthetic Inflammation and Pain Following Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight-Polyethylene Wear Debris in the Lumbar Spine. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2018; 14: 695-706
  • 18 De la Garza-Ramos R, Abt NB, Kerezoudis P. et al. Deep-wound and organ-space infection after surgery for degenerative spine disease: an analysis from 2006 to 2012. Neurol Res 2016; 38: 117-123 doi:10.1080/01616412.2016.1138669
  • 19 Park JB, Chang H, Yeom JS. et al. Revision surgeries following artificial disc replacement of cervical spine. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2016; 50: 610-618 doi:10.1016/j.aott.2016.04.004
  • 20 Thomas S, Willems K, Van den Daelen L. et al. The M6-C Cervical Disk Prosthesis: First Clinical Experience in 33 Patients. Clin Spine Surg 2016; 29: E182-E187
  • 21 Brenke C, Schmieder K, Barth M. Core herniation after implantation of a cervical artificial disc: case report. Eur Spine J 2015; 24 (Suppl. 04) S536-S539
  • 22 Baltus C, Costa E, Vaz G. et al. Granulomatous Reaction on a double-level cervical total disc arthroplasty. World Neurosurg 2019; 122: 360-363
  • 23 Jain A, Modhia UM, Njoku DB. et al. Recurrence of Deep Surgical Site Infection in Cerebral Palsy After Spinal Fusion Is Rare. Spine Deform 2017; 5: 208-212
  • 24 Aiyer SN, Shetty AP, Kanna R. et al. Enterococcus faecalis causing delayed spondylodiscitis in a case with retained intraspinal bullet. J Spine Surg 2016; 2: 328-333
  • 25 Tarr PE, Sakoulas G, Ganesan A. et al. Hematogenous enterococcal vertebral osteomyelitis: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. J Infect 2004; 48: 354-362
  • 26 Mosquera V, Campos V, Valle JV. et al. Septic necrosis of the odontoid apophysis and cervical spondylodiscitis from Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis: a first report. Heart Surg Forum 2008; 11: E108-E109
  • 27 Soultanis KC, Sakellariou VI, Starantzis KA. et al. Insidious Onset of Tetraparesis due to Cervical Epidural Abscess from Enterococcus faecalis. Case Rep Med 2013; 2013: 513920 doi:10.1155/2013/513920
  • 28 Bang JH, Cho KT. Rapidly Progressive Gas-containing Lumbar Spinal Epidural Abscess. Korean J Spine 2015; 12: 139-142