Ungleichgewicht von Produktion und Resorption des LCS

Nachdem William Garner Sutherland 1900 an der American School of Osteopathy graduiert hatte [1], forschte er über Jahrzehnte an der Entwicklung seines kranialen Konzepts. Dabei entdeckte und lehrte er auch die Wichtigkeit und zentrale Rolle des Liquor cerebrospinalis (LCS). Mittlerweile ist dieser für viele Osteopathen ein wichtiger Parameter bei der osteopathischen Diagnostik und Therapie. Solange wir uns im Bereich der normalen, ausgeglichenen LCS-Physiologie befinden, ist eine kraniale Dynamik gut wahrnehmbar. Aber wenn ein gewisses Ungleichgewicht zwischen LCS-Produktion und -Resorption entsteht, steigt der intrakraniale Druck (ICP), sodass die kraniale Dynamik abnimmt. Mit diesem Beitrag und dem Fallbeispiel versuchen wir, anhand aktueller Studien ein besseres Verständnis von diesem Gleichgewichtsphänomen für die osteopathische Anwendung zu vermitteln.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. Juli 2021

• Literatur

• 1 Stark JE. Journeyman: William Garner Sutherland, The Formative Years (1873 – 1900). Moffat: Roe House; 2020
• 2 Monro A. Observations on the structure and function of the nervous system. Edinburgh: Creech & Johnson; 1823
• 3 Kellie G. An account of the appearances observed in the dissection of two of the three individuals presumed to have perished in the storm of the 3rd, and whose body were discovered in the vicinity of Leith on the morning of the 4th November 1821 with some reflections on the pathology of the brain. The Transactions of the Medico-Chirurgical Society of Edinburgh 1824; 1: 84-169
• 4 Nelson KE. et al. Cranial Rhythmic impulse Related to Traube-Hering-Mayer Oscillation: Comparing Laser-Doppler Flowmetry and Palpation. JAOA 2001; 101 (03) 163-173
• 5 Pinto VL, Adeyinka A. Increased Intracranial Pressure. Treasure Island: StatPearls; 2018. available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482119
• 6 Sakka L. et al. Anatomy and physiology of cerebrospinal fluid. Review of literature. Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck diseases 2011; 128: 309-316
• 7 Rangel-Castilla L. et al. Management of intracranial hypertension. Neurol Clin 2008; 26 (02) 521-541
• 8 Gaurav G. Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Background (Stand: 2.4.2018). https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1829950
• 9 Silverberg GD. et al. The cerebrospinal fluid production rate is reduced in dementia of the Alzheimerʼs type. Neurology 2001; 57 (10) 1763-1766
• 10 Brinker T. et al. A new look at cerebrospinal fluid circulation. Fluids Barriers CNS 2014; 11: 10
• 11 Redzic Z. Molecular biology of the blood–brain barrier and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers: similarities and differences. Fluids Barriers CNS 2011; 8 (01) 3
• 12 Johanson CE. et al. Multiplicity of cerebrospinal fluid functions : new challenges in health and disease. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2008; 5: 10
• 13 Yamada S. et al. Influence of respiration on cerebrospinal fluid movement using magnetic resonance spin labelling. Fluids Barriers CNS 2013; 10 (10) 36
• 14 Yamada S. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid physiology: visualization of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics using the magnetic resonance imaging Time-Spatial Inversion Pulse method. Croat Med J 2014; 55 (04) 337-346
• 15 Kiviniemi V. et al. Ultra-fast magnetic resonance encephalography of physiological brain activity – Glymphatic pulsation mechanisms?. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016; 36 (06) 1033-1045
• 16 Smith AJ. Test of the “glymphatic” hypothesis demonstrates diffusive and aquaporin-4 independent solute transport in rodent brain parenchyma. eLife 2017; 6: e27679
• 17 Plog BA, Nedergaard M. The Glymphatic System in Central Nervous System Health and Disease: Past, Present, and Future. Annu Rev Pathol 2018; 13: 379-394
• 18 Bothwell SW. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and intracranial pressure elevation in neurological diseases. Fluids Barriers CNS 2019; 16: 9
• 19 Aspelund A. A dural lymphatic vascular system that drains brain interstitial fluid and macromolecules. J Exp Med 2015; 212 (07) 991-999
• 20 Louveau A. et al. Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature 2015; 523(7560): 337-341
• 21 Miyajima M, Arai H. Evaluation of the Production and Absorption of Cerebrospinal Fluid. Neurol Med Chir 2015; 55 (08) 647-656
• 22 Osaka K. Development of the cerebrospinal fluid pathway in the normal and abnormal human embryos. Childs Brain 1980; 6 (01) 26-38
• 23 Mollanji R. et al. Blocking cerebrospinal fluid absorption through the cribriform plate increases resting intracranial pressure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2002; R1593-R1599
• 24 Silver I. et al. Relationship between intracranial pressure and cervical lymphatic pressure and flow rates in sheep. Am J Physiol 1999; 277: R1712-R1717
• 25 Biceroglu H. et al. Direct venous spinal reabsorption of cerebrospinal fluid: a new concept with serial magnetic resonance cisternography in rabbits. J Neurosurg Spine 2012; 16: 394-401
• 26 Zamboni P. et al. Venous Collateral Circulation of the Extracranial Cerebrospinal Outflow Routes. Current Neurovascular Research 2009; 6 (03) 204-212
• 27 Sosa et al.. Abdominal compartment syndrome. Disease-a-Month 2019; 65: 5-19
• 28 Josten S. Erhöhter Bauchdruck/Gefährlicher Vorbote. Pflegeintensiv 2010; 7: 34-37
• 29 Searcy M. Demystifying Management of Intracranial Pressure. Nursing Spectrum. 2006
• 30 Ece I. et al. The increase of intra-abdominal pressure can affect intraocular pressure. BioMed Research Internat 2015; ID986895: 1-4
• 31 Hickman SJ. et al. Vision and Multiple Sclerosis. Review. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 2014; 3 (01) 3-16
• 32 Costello F. Vision Disturbances in Multiple Sclerosis. Semin Neurol 2016; 36 (02) 185-195
• 33 Kraml M. Der venolymphatische Pumpmechanismus. Denkmodell oder Wirklichkeit?. DO 2013; 2: 1-5
• 34 Buekens J. Bone – The Best-Kept Secret. Garnich: School of Bones – Publisher and Promotion; 2020
• 35 Liem T. Kraniosakrale Osteopathie. 7. Aufl.. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2018