Video Consultations and Their Utilization by Orthopedic and Trauma Surgeons During the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Go-To Technology in the Future or Just a Stopgap?

Abstract

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, the contact restrictions imposed for protection against infection have limited the options for direct medical therapy. Considering this, the present study aimed to evaluate the utility of the rarely used online video consultation as an alternative treatment form for orthopedic and trauma surgeons and analyze its potential for future use.

Methods During calendar week 24 in the year 2020, 215 specialists in orthopedics and orthopedics and trauma surgery in the city and greater region of Hanover, Germany, were enrolled in a questionnaire-based evaluation of their use of video consultations. The analysis consisted of 125 completed questionnaires, which corresponded to a return rate of 58.1%. The completed questionnaires recorded the number of users, frequency of utilization, and advantages and disadvantages of online treatment, as well as provided an assessment of the future use of telemedicine and video consultations. Furthermore, we considered the necessary requirements for using video consultations and for continuing their use in the future as well as the potential of performing online consultations given that all pertinent conditions are fulfilled.

Results Among the 125 respondents, only 17 (13.6%) had already experienced video consultations, all starting during the COVID-19 pandemic, but with very low frequencies (maximum of one–three times per week). Despite the limitations, the advantages included helping patients receive the required treatments and reducing the need for travel. However, the respondents mentioned that there were several disadvantages due to diagnostic limitations: there was no direct examination, primary consultations were restricted, and possibilities of consultations and explanations were reduced. Of the 108 (86.4%) respondents who had not experienced video consultations, only 9 (8.3%) had specifically planned to conduct online consultation, whereas 57 (52.8%) had no such intention in the foreseeable future and 42 (38.9%) were undecided on this point. They stated diagnostic limitations because of the lack of direct examination (44/77.2%) and the indispensable personal contact with the patient (30/52.6%) as main counter-arguments. According to all the respondents, the main requirements for the implementation of video consultations included establishment of proper technology (81.6%), adequate remuneration (61.6%), legal certainty (58.4%), fast and unbureaucratic support for installation and in case of problems (51.2%), and a manageable bureaucracy during the initial period (44.8%).

Conclusion Video consultations and telemedicine in general undoubtedly have advantages, primarily concerning the protection from infection and contact restrictions, which are increasingly requested by patients. However, the collected data indicate that this approach may remain less important than personal consultations in the field of orthopedics and trauma surgery. As suggested by available data, this does not apply to other fields such as psychotherapy or general medicine.

Key words

COVID-19 pandemic - online consultation - orthopedics - telemedicine - video consultation

Publication History

Article published online:
12 July 2021

• References/Literatur

• 1 Füeßl H, Middeke M. Duale Reihe Anamnese und klinische Untersuchung. 6. Aufl.. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2018
• 2 Konrads C, Rudert M. Hrsg. Klinische Tests und Untersuchung in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. Berlin: Springer; 2018
• 3 Meier R, Holderried M, Kraus TM. Digitalisierung in der Arzt-Patienten-Kommunikation. In: Pfannstiel MA, Da-Cruz P, Rasche C. Hrsg. Entrepreneurship im Gesundheitswesen III. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler; 2018: 63-74
• 4 Hahn H, Schreiber A. Potenzial der Digitalen Transformation in der Medizin. In: Neugebauer R. Hrsg. Digitalisierung. Schlüsseltechnologien für Wirtschaft & Gesellschaft. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg; 2018: 321-345
• 5 Wolff D. Gesundheit 4.0. eHealth vs. smart Health – inklusive eines Ausblicks auf die Sozialwirtschaft 4.0. In: Wolff D, Göbel R. Hrsg. Digitalisierung: Segen oder Fluch?. Berlin: Springer; 2018: 151-189
• 6 Dwertmann A, Schürholz M. Digitalisierung in der Gesundheit. In: Wittpahl V. Hrsg. Digitalisierung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg; 2016: 165-172
• 7 Jörg J. Digitalisierung in der Medizin. Wie Gesundheits-Apps, Telemedizin, künstliche Intelligenz und Robotik das Gesundheitswesen revolutionieren. Berlin: Springer; 2018
• 8 Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung. Videosprechstunde: telemedizinisch gestützte Betreuung von Patienten. Im Internet (Stand: 27.12.2020): http://www.kbv.de/html/videosprechstunde.php
• 9 Krüger-Brand H. Telemedizin. Sichere Alternative per Video. Dtsch Ärztebl 2020; 117: 574-575
• 10 Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Coronavirus-Pandemie (SARS-CoV-2): Chronik bisheriger Maßnahmen. Im Internet (Stand: 27.12.2020): http://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/coronavirus/chronik-coronavirus.html
• 11 Freudenberg S, Vossen D. Auswirkungen von COVID-19 auf die rheumatologische Versorgung. Eine nationale Umfrage im April 2020. Z Rheumatol 2020; 79: 584-589 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-020-00833-z.
• 12 Kahl K. COVID-19. Sonderregelung für Praxen. Dtsch Ärztebl 2020; 117: A788-A789
• 13 Gerlof H. Ärzte hadern mit Telemedizin. InFo Hämatol Onkol 2020; 23: 55 DOI: 10.1007/s15004-020-7984-9.
• 14 MLP. MLP Gesundheitsreport 2019. Im Internet (Stand 27.12.2020): http://mlp-se.de/redaktion/mlp-se-de/gesundheitsreport-microsite/2019/report/mlp-gesundheitsreport-2019.pdf
• 15 Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Niedersachsen (KVN). Pressemitteilung vom 28.08.2020: Boom der Videosprechstunde – Video-Chat statt Wartezimmer. Im Internet (Stand 27.12.2020): http://www.kvn.de/Presse/Boom+der+Videosprechstunde+_+Video_Chat+statt+Wartezimmer-press-7645-p-7645.html
• 16 Haun MW, Hoffmann M, Tönnies J. et al. Videokonsultationen durch Psychotherapeuten in Zeiten der COVID-19-Pandemie. Wirksamkeit, Gestaltung des Settings und erste Erfahrungen aus einer Machbarkeitsstudie sowie mit dem Routineangebot im Krankenhaus. Psychotherapeut (Berl ) 2020; 65: 291-296 DOI: 10.1007/s00278-020-00438-6.
• 17 Pförringer D, Ansorg J, Osterhoff G. et al. Digitalisierung in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie: Stand 2020 in Klinik und Praxis. Unfallchirurg 2020; 123: 830-835 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-020-00895-3.
• 18 Aarnio P, Lamminen H, Lepistö J. et al. A prospective study of teleconferencing for orthopaedic consultations. J Telemed Telecare 1999; 5: 62-66 DOI: 10.1258/1357633991932405.
• 19 Buvik A, Bugge E, Knutsen G. et al. Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research 2016; 16: 483 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1717-7.
• 20 Buvik A, Bergmo TS, Bugge E. et al. Cost-effectiveness of telemedicine in remote orthopedic consultations: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21: e11330 DOI: 10.2196/11330.
• 21 Marsh J, Hoch JS, Bryant D. et al. Economic evaluation of web-based compared with in-person follow-up after total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 1910-1916 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01558.
• 22 Pastora-Bernal JM, Martin-Valero R, Barón-Lòpez F. et al. Evidence of benefit of telerehabitation after orthopedic surgery: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19: e142 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6836.
• 23 Hurley ET, Haskel JD, Bloom DA. et al. The use and acceptance of telemedicine in orthopedic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2020; DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0255.
• 24 Parisien RL, Shin M, Constant M. et al. Telehealth utilization in response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28: e487-e492 DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00339.
• 25 Neville K, Black AT, Fridman R. Epidemiological survey of the impact of COVID-19 on telemedicine in the practice of foot and ankle surgery in the United States. J Foot Ankle Surg 2020; DOI: 10.1053/j.ifas.2020.08.003.
• 26 Backhaus L, Bierke S, Karpinski K. et al. SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie und ihre Auswirkungen auf Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie: „Booster“ für die Telemedizin. Knie J 2020; DOI: 10.1007/s43205-020-00062-z.
• 27 Dent PA, Wilke B, Terkonda S. et al. Validation of teleconference-based goniometry for measuring elbow joint range of motion. Cureus 2020; 12: e6925 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6925.
• 28 Tanaka MJ, Oh LS, Martin SD. et al. Telemedicine in the era of COVID-10: the virtual orthopaedic examination. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102: e57 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00609.
• 29 Marsh J, Bryant D, MacDonald SJ. et al. Are patients satisfied with a web-based followup after total joint arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 1972-1981 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3514-0.
• 30 Buvik A, Bugge E, Knutsen G. et al. Patient reported outcomes with remote orthopaedic consultations by telemedicine: A randomised controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 2019; 25: 451-459 DOI: 10.1177/1357633X18783921.
• 31 Holderried M, Schlipf M, Höper A. et al. Chancen und Risiken der Telemedizin in der Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. Z Orthop Unfall 2018; 156: 68-77 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-116941.
• 32 Shafi K, Lovecchio F, Riew GJ. et al. Telemedicine in research and training: spine surgeon perspectives and practices worldwide. Eur Spine J 2021; DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06716-w.