Aktuelle Urol 2021; 52(04): 360-366
DOI: 10.1055/a-1472-5553
Übersicht

Neue Aspekte zur Fournierschen Gangrän – Ein Rapid Review

New aspects in Fournierʼs gangrene – a rapid review
Jennifer Kranz
1   St-Antonius-Hospital gGmbH, Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Eschweiler
3   Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale)
,
Desiree L. Dräger
2   Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Rostock
,
Laila Schneidewind
2   Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Rostock
› Author Affiliations

Zusammenfassung

Die Fourniersche Gangrän (FG) ist eine sporadische, lebensbedrohliche, nekrotisierende Infektion des Perineums, der Perinealregion und des äußeren Genitales. Aus der Literatur gibt es einige Hinweise darauf, dass die Prognose der Erkrankung in den letzten Jahren nicht wesentlich verbessert werden konnte. Daher wurde eine schnelle Evidenzanalyse mittels Literaturrecherche in MEDLINE aus den aktuellen Publikationen des Jahres 2020 durchgeführt, um mittels neuer Aspekte zu ermöglichen, die Versorgungssituation der betroffenen Patienten zu verbessern und weitere Forschungsvorhaben ideal zu planen. Insgesamt konnten für dieses Review 18 Publikationen berücksichtigt werden. Bei 15 dieser Arbeiten handelt es sich um Orginalarbeiten sowie 3 systematische Reviews. Bez. der Orginalarbeiten handelt es sich um 12 retrospektive Fallserien, 2 epidemiologische und eine prospektive Studie. 2 der systematischen Reviews inkludieren ebenfalls eine Metaanalyse. Die Mehrzahl der Autoren dieser Publikationen kommt unter anderem zu der Schlussfolgerung, dass die FG weiterhin eine ernsthafte Erkrankung mit teils inakzeptablen Mortalitätsraten für die moderne Medizin ist und es in der Therapie weiterhin Optimierungsbedarf gibt. Weiterhin wurden neue Risikofaktoren identifiziert, die mit einer erhöhten Mortalität bei FG Patienten assoziiert sind. Es handelt sich um eine Dyslipoproteinämie, Diabetes mellitus, Herzerkrankungen und akutes sowie chronisches Nierenversagen. 4 der inkludierten Arbeiten untersuchten den Zusammenhang des Auftretens von FG und der Einnahme oraler Antidiabetika, SGLT2- sowie DPP4-Hemmern. Keine Studie konnte dabei einen signifikanten Zusammenhang nachweisen, insbesondere eine Metaanalyse mit 84 Studien nicht. Vielversprechende Konzepte für die Wundbehandlung sind die hyperbare Oxygenierung (HBO), der vakuum-assistierte Wundverschluss und Wundkonditionierung mittels Larven. Zusammenfassend ist die FG ein seltenes, aber immer noch potenziell vital bedrohliches Krankheitsbild. Die Prognose konnte in den letzten Jahren nicht verbessert werden. Daher ist eine weitere Therapieoptimierung dringend erforderlich. Dies kann nur durch weitere Studien erreicht werden. Aufgrund der Seltenheit der Erkrankung sehen wir die Möglichkeit dies mit einer nationalen Registerstudie zu erreichen. Zusätzlich können aus dem Register Risikostratefizierungen erarbeitet werden, welche Patienten z. B. von einer Therapie in einem Zentrum oder bestimmten Wundkonditionierungen profitieren.

Abstract

Fournierʼs gangrene (FG) is a sporadic, life-threatening, necrotising infection affecting the perineum, perineal region and genitals. Published literature provides hints that the outcome of this disease has failed to improve in recent years. We have therefore performed a rapid evidence synthesis by searching the database MEDLINE. The literature from 2020 was studied to identify new aspects to improve the care of FG patients and plan further therapeutic research. 18 publications were chosen for this review, 15 of these were original research and three systematic reviews. 12 were retrospective case series, 2 epidemiological studies, with one prospective clinical study, one systematic review and 2 systematic reviews, together with a meta-analysis. Most of the authors of the studies concluded that FG is still a severe disease with unacceptable mortality rates, so that there is urgent need for therapy improvement. New risk factors for higher mortality in FG have been identified in these studies, namely dyslipoproteinemia, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, as well as both acute and chronic kidney failure. Furthermore, 4 of the included studies investigated the association of SGLT2- and DDP4-inhibitors, which are drugs used in diabetes mellitus, and the incidence of FG. No studies reported a significant association between these drugs and FG, especially not a meta-analysis with 84 included studies. New promising concepts for wound conditioning are hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO), vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAC) and Maggot therapy (blowfly larvae). In summary, FG is still a severe disease, the prognosis has not improved in recent years and so there is an urgent need for improved therapy. This could only be achieved with further research in FG. In our opinion and due to the rarity of FG, this would be possible with a national registry study. For example, it might be possible to calculate risk stratification from this registry to identify patients who would benefit from treatment in a centre or with special wound conditioning.



Publication History

Article published online:
21 April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Kranz J, Schlager D, Anheuser P. et al. Desperate need for better management in Fournier´s gangrene. Cent European J Urol 2018; 71: 360-365
  • 2 Osburn N, Hapson LA, Holt SK. et al. Low-volume versus High-volume centers and management of Founierʼs Gangrene in Washington State. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 224: 270-275
  • 3 Yilmazlar T, Gulcu B, Isik O. et al. Microbiological aspects of Fournier's gangrene. Int J Surg 2017; 40: 135-138
  • 4 Kranz J, Wagenlehner FME, Steffens J. et al. Contemporary practice patterns in the treatment of Fournierʼs gangrene in German academic medicine and their implications for planning a registry study. Urologe A 2021; DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01461-4.
  • 5 Furr J, Watts T, Street R. et al. Contemporary trends in the inpatient management of Fournierʼs gangrene: Predictors of length of stay and mortality based on population-based sample. Urology 2017; 102: 79-84
  • 6 Bjurlin MA, OʼGrady T, Kim DY. et al. Causative pathogens, antibiotic sensitivity, resistance patterns, and severity in a contemporary series of Fournier's gangrene. Urology 2013; 4: 752-758
  • 7 Chia L, Crum-Cianflone NF. Emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) causing fournier's gangrene. J Infect 2018; 76: 243-248
  • 8 Bozkurt O, Sen V, Demir O. et al. Evaluation of the utility of different scoring systems (FGSI, LRINEC and NLR) in the management of Fournier's gangrene. Int Urol Nephrol 2015; 47: 243-248
  • 9 Sorensen MD, Krieger JD. Fournierʼs gangrene: Epidemiology and outcomes in the general US population. Urol Int 2016; 97: 249-259
  • 10 Roghmann F, von Bodman C, Löppenberg B. et al. Is there a need for the Fournierʼs gangrene severity index? Comparison of scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with Fournierʼs gangrene. BJU Int 2012; 110: 1359-1365
  • 11 Tarchouli M, Bounaim A, Essarghini M. et al. Analysis of prognostic factors affecting mortality in Fournierʼs gangrene: A study of 72 cases. Can Urol Assoc J 2015; 9: 800-804
  • 12 Czymek R, Kujath P, Bruch HP. et al. Treatment, outcome and quality of life after Fournierʼs gangrene: a multicentre study. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 1529-1536
  • 13 Hong KS, Yi HJ, Lee RA. et al. Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes for patients with Fournierʼs gangrene: a retrospective study. Int Wound J 2017; 14: 1352-1358
  • 14 Tang LM, Su YJ, Lai YC. The evaluation of microbiology and prognosis of Fournierʼs gangrene in past five years. Springer Plus 2015; 4: 14
  • 15 Doluoglu ÖG, Karagöz MA, Kilinc MF. et al. Overview of the different scoring systems in Fournierʼs gangrene and assessment of prognostic factors. Turk J Urol 2016; 42: 190-196
  • 16 Sarkut P, Isik Ö, Öztürk E. et al. Gender does not affect the prognosis of Fournierʼs gangrene: a casematched study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2016; 22: 541-544
  • 17 Ferretti M, Saji AA, Phillips J. Fournierʼs gangrene: A review and outcome comparison from 2009 to 2016. Adv Wound Care 2017; 6: 289-295
  • 18 Eke N. Fournierʼs gangrene: a review of 1726 cases. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 718-728
  • 19 Yeniyol CO, Suelozgen T, Arslan M. et al. Fournierʼs gangrene: experience with 25 patients and use of Fournierʼs gangrene severity index score. Urology 2004; 64: 218e-222
  • 20 Stone HH, Martin Jr JD. Synergistic necrotizing cellulitis. Ann Surg 1972; 175: 702-711
  • 21 Anheuser P, Mühlstädt S, Kranz J. et al. Significance of hyperbaric oxygenation in the treatment of Fournierʼs gangrene: a comparative study. Urol Int 2018; 101: 467-471
  • 22 Haby MM, Chapman E, Clark R. et al. What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review. Health Res Policy Syst 2016; 14: 83
  • 23 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: e1-e34
  • 24 Agwu NP, Muhammad AS, Abdullahi AA. et al. Pattern and outcome of management of Fournierʼs gangrene in a resource-constraint setting. Urol Ann 2020; DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_62_19.
  • 25 Akan S, Urkmez A. Association between atherogenic dyslipidemia and fournierʼs gangrene. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2020; 66: 479-484
  • 26 Beecroft NJ, Jaeger CD, Rose JR. et al. Fiurnierʼs gangrene in females: Presentation and management at a tertiary center. Urology 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.056.
  • 27 Castillejo BecerraCM, Jaeger CD, Rose JR. et al. Microorganisms and antibiogram patterns in Fournierʼs gangrene: Contemporary experience from a single tertiary care center. J Urol 2020; 204: 1249-55
  • 28 Creta M, Longo N, Arcaniolo D. et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy reduces mortality in patients with Fournierʼs gangrene – Results from a multi-institutional observational study. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2020; 72: 223-228
  • 29 Egin S, Kamali S, Hot S. et al. Comparison of mortality in Fournierʼs gangrene with the two scoring systems. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2020; 30: 67-72
  • 30 Eksi M, Arikan Y, Simsek A. et al. Factors affecting length of stay in Fournierʼs gangrene: a retrospective analysis of 10 yearsʼ data. Aktuelle Urol 2020; DOI: 10.1055/a-1260-2576.
  • 31 Fisher A, Fralick M, Filion KB. et al. Sodium-glucoce co-transporter-2 inhibitors and the risk of urosepsis: A multi-site, prevalent new-user cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020; 22: 1648-48
  • 32 Iacovelli V, Cipriani C, Sandri M. et al. The role of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in the management of Fournierʼs gangrene: a retrospective multi-institutional cohort study. World Journal of Urology 2020; DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03170-7.
  • 33 Radcliffe RS, Khan MA. Mortality associated with Fournierʼs gangrene remains unchanged over 25 years. BJU Int 2020; 125: 610-16
  • 34 Wong R, Blachman-Braun R, Mann U. et al. Location of residence and mortality for patients diagnosed with Fournierʼs gangrene. Can Urol Assoc J 2020; DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6749.
  • 35 Zhang N, Yu X, Zhang K. et al. A retrospective case series of Fournierʼs gangrene: necrotizing fasciitis in perineum and perianal region. BMC Surg 2020; 20: 259
  • 36 Wang T, Patel SM, Hickman A. et al. SGLT2 inhibitors and the risk of hospitalization for Fournierʼs gangrene: A nested case-control study. Diabetes Ther 2020; 11: 711-723
  • 37 Yang JY, Wang T, Pate V. et al. Real-world evidence on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use and risk of Fourniers gangrene. BMJ Open Diab Res Care 2020; 8: e000985
  • 38 Fonseca-Munoz A, Sarmiento-Jimenez HE, Perez-Pecheco R. et al. Clinical study of Maggot therapy for Fournierʼs gangrene. Int Wound J 2020; 17: 1642-1649
  • 39 Franco-Buenaventura D, Garcia-Perdomo HA. Vacuum-assisted closure device in the postoperative wound care for Fournierʼs gangrene: a systematic review. International Journal of Urology and Nephrology 2020; DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02705-6.
  • 40 El-Qushayri AE, Khalaf KM, Dahy A. et al. Fournierʼs gangrene mortality: a 17-year systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Infectious Dieases 2020; 92: 218-222
  • 41 Silverii GA, Dicembrini I, Monami M. et al. Fournierʼs gangrene and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020; 22: 272-275
  • 42 Linday PJ, Gibson LE, Bittner EA. et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor-induced euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis complicating the perioperative management of a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and Fournierʼs gangrene: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2020; 77: 463-466
  • 43 Schneidewind L, Anheuser P, Schönburg S. et al. Hyperbaric Oxygenation in the Treatment of Fournierʼs Gangrene: A Systematic Review. Urol Int 2020; DOI: 10.1159/000511615.