Ultraschall Med 2021; 42(04): 344-346
DOI: 10.1055/a-1511-9997
Editorial

Is CEUS the future for imaging complex renal cysts? Are we on the threshold of a change?

Ist CEUS die Zukunft in der Bildgebung komplexer Nierenzysten? Stehen wir an der Schwelle zur Veränderung?
Paul S. Sidhu
,
Ole Graumann
,
Jolanta Webb

The paper by Gasser et al in this issue compares the cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as a diagnostic option for indeterminate cystic renal lesions [1]. The cost-effectiveness of CEUS has also been investigated and reported recently by Spiesecke at al., adding contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) along with MR imaging, demonstrating the clear cost-effectiveness of CEUS [2]. An EFSUMB 2020 position statement, examining the evidence for the use of CEUS in the assessment of complex renal cysts, ascertained the usefulness of this technique when applying the CECT based Bosniak classification [3]. Are we therefore on the threshold of a change in clinical practice in relation to the diagnostic management of a complex renal cyst?



Publication History

Article published online:
03 August 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Gassert F, Schnitzer M, Kim SH. et al Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound as Diagnostic Options for Unclear Cystic Renal Lesions: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Ultraschall in Med 2020; DOI: 10.1055/a-1110-7172. . Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32052386
  • 2 Spiesecke P, Reinhold T, Wehrenberg Y. et al Cost-effectiveness analysis of multiple imaging modalities in diagnosis and follow-up of intermediate complex cystic renal lesions. BJU International. 2021 Feb 2 [e-pub]
  • 3 Cantisani V, Bertolotto M, Clevert DA. et al EFSUMB 2020 Proposal for a Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Adapted Bosniak Cyst Categorization: Position Statement. Ultraschall in Med 2021; 42 (02) 154-166
  • 4 Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 1986; 158 (01) 1-10
  • 5 Silverman SG, Pedrosa I, Ellis JH. et al Bosniak Classification of Cystic Renal Masses, Version 2019: An Update Proposal and Needs Assessment. Radiology 2019; 292 (02) 475-488
  • 6 Krishna S, Schieda N, Pedrosa I. et al Update on MRI of Cystic Renal Masses Including Bosniak Version 2019. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Oct 2 [e-pub]
  • 7 Bosniak MA. The Bosniak Renal Cyst Classification: 25 Years Later. Radiology 2012; 262: 781-785
  • 8 Schoots IG, Zaccai K, Hunink MG. et al Bosniak Classification for Complex Renal Cysts Reevaluated: A Systematic Review. Journal of Urology 2017; 198 (01) 12-21
  • 9 Smith AD, Carson JD, Sirous R. et al Active Surveillance Versus Nephron-Sparing Surgery for a Bosniak IIF or III Renal Cyst: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Am J Roentgenol 2019; 212 (04) 830-838
  • 10 Graumann O, Osther SS, Karstoft J. et al Bosniak classification system: a prospective comparison of CT, contrast-enhanced US, and MR for categorizing complex renal cystic masses. Acta Radiologica 2015; 57 (11) 1409-1417
  • 11 Barr RG. Is there a need to modify the Bosnaik renal mass classification with the addition of contrast-enhanced sonography?. J Ultrasound Med 2017; 36: 865-868
  • 12 Sidhu PS, Choi BI, Bachmann NM. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): a new dawn for the escalating use of this ubiquitous technique. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 32: 5-7