Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2021; 146(18): e74-e80
DOI: 10.1055/a-1543-2511
Originalarbeit

Mitbetreuung und Einbeziehung von Angehörigen in Comprehensive Cancer Centern – eine Erhebung der AG Palliativmedizin der von der Deutschen Krebshilfe geförderten Onkologischen Spitzenzentren

Support for and involvement of family caregivers in Comprehensive Cancer Center – an Assessment of the Palliative Care Working Group within the network of Comprehensive Cancer Center funded by the German Cancer Aid
Karin Oechsle 
1   Palliativmedizin, 2. Medizinische Klinik, Universitäres Cancer Center Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
Tabea Theißen
1   Palliativmedizin, 2. Medizinische Klinik, Universitäres Cancer Center Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
Maria Heckel
2   Palliativmedizinische Abteilung, Comprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
,
Lisa Schwenzitzki
1   Palliativmedizin, 2. Medizinische Klinik, Universitäres Cancer Center Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
Anneke Ullrich
1   Palliativmedizin, 2. Medizinische Klinik, Universitäres Cancer Center Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
Christoph Ostgathe
2   Palliativmedizinische Abteilung, Comprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung Eine leitliniengerechte onkologische Versorgung umfasst nicht nur die frühzeitige palliativmedizinische Mitbetreuung unheilbar erkrankter Patienten, sondern auch die Mitbetreuung ihrer Angehörigen. Untersuchungen zur Umsetzung im klinischen Alltag in Deutschland fehlen.

Methoden Die AG Palliativmedizin im Netzwerk der von der Deutschen Krebshilfe geförderten Onkologischen Spitzenzentren (CCC) führte mit einem selbstgestalteten Fragebogen eine systematische Erfassung aller Angebote in den CCC/in der spezialisierten Palliativversorgung (SPV) im CCC/lokal außerhalb des CCC an allen Standorten durch.

Ergebnisse Gut etabliert in den 17 CCC/in der SPV sind die psychoonkologische (100 %/94 %), sozialrechtliche (94 %/100 %) und seelsorgerische Beratung der Angehörigen (je 94 %) sowie Angebote für Kinder erkrankter Eltern (88 %/100 %) und Informationsmaterialien (je 88 %). Häufiger als im restlichen CCC werden in der SPV pflegerische Schulungen (77 %/94 %) und Familienkonferenzen (59 %/88 %) durchgeführt. SOPs sind mit 23 %/18 % selten etabliert, ebenso wie Screenings der Angehörigenbedürfnisse (0/24 %). Trauer- und Selbsthilfegruppen sind mit je 82 % häufiger außerhalb der CCC verfügbar. Die psychoonkologische/sozialrechtliche Beratung und Angebote für Kinder erkrankter Eltern (je 94 %) wurden als am wichtigsten für ein CCC eingeschätzt. Für die SPV waren es zudem die pflegerische Schulung sowie Informationsmaterialien (je 94 %). SOPs wurden mit 47 %/41 % als sehr/extrem wichtig betrachtet, und Screenings der Angehörigenbedürfnisse mit 53 %/65 %.

Schlussfolgerung Psychosoziale/seelsorgerische Beratung der Angehörigen sowie Angebote für Kinder erkrankter Eltern sind in den CCC entsprechend ihrer Bedeutung gut etabliert, in der SPV auch pflegerische Schulungen und Familienkonferenzen. SOPs zur Mitbetreuung und Einbeziehung von Angehörigen sowie Screenings der Angehörigenbedürfnisse müssen dringend implementiert werden.

Abstract

Background According to current oncological guidelines, early integration of specialist palliative care (SPC) represents standard cancer care supporting not only the patients, but also their family caregivers. Data on the actual implementation in daily oncology practice in Germany are lacking.

Methods The Palliative Care Working Group of the network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers certified by the German Cancer Aid (CCC) assessed the implementation of measures for family caregiver support and involvement within the CCC/within SPC in the CCC/local outside the CCC in all 17 CCC locations.

Results In the CCC/in SPC psycho-oncological (100 %/94 %), social (94 %/100 %) and spiritual counselling of family caregivers (94 % each) as well as support for children with parental cancer (88 %/100 %) and information materials for family caregivers (88 % each) are well established. Training on nursing skills (77 %/94 %) and family conferences (59 %/88 %) are established more frequently within SPC than in the rest of the CCC. SOPs are rather rare (23 %/18 %) as well as screenings for family caregiver needs (0/24 %). Bereavement or self-help groups are with 82 % each more frequent locally outside the CCC. Psycho-oncological and social counselling as well as support for children with parental cancer were scored as most important (94 % each). For SPC, training on nursing skills and information materials were rated equally (94 % each). SOPs were rated as very/extremely important in 47 %/41 % and routine screening for family caregiver in 53 %/65 %.

Conclusion In correspondence to their importance, psychosocial and spiritual counselling and support for children with parental cancer are well implemented in CCC. In SPC, training on nursing skills and family conferences are also well implemented. SOPs for family caregiver support and involvement as well as routine screenings for family caregiver needs have to be implemented urgently in the CCC.

Schlüsselwörter

Angehörige - Unterstützung - Comprehensive Cancer Center - Palliativmedizin

Key words

family caregiver - support - counselling - Comprehensive Cancer Center - palliative care

Supplement



Publication History

Article published online:
20 August 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 WHO. National cancer control programmes: policies and managerial guidelines. World Health Organization; 2002
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dionne-Odom JN, Demark-Wahnefried W, Taylor RA. et al. The self-care practices of family caregivers of persons with poor prognosis cancer: differences by varying levels of caregiver well-being and preparedness. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25: 2437-2444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Laryionava K, Pfeil TA, Dietrich M. et al. The second patient? Family members of cancer patients and their role in end-of-life decision making. BMC Palliat Care 2018; 17: 29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Oechsle K, Ullrich A, Marx G. et al. Psychological burden in family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer at initiation of specialist inpatient palliative care. BMC Palliat Care 2019; 18: 102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Oechsle K, Ullrich A, Marx G. et al. Prevalence and Predictors of Distress, Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life in Bereaved Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2020; 37: 201-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Preisler M, Heuse S, Riemer M. et al. Early integration of palliative cancer care: patients' and caregivers' challenges, treatment preferences, and knowledge of illness and treatment throughout the cancer trajectory. Support Care Cancer 2018; 26: 921-931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rosenberger C, Höcker A, Cartus M. et al. [Outpatient psycho-oncological care for family members and patients: access, psychological distress and supportive care needs]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2012; 62: 185-194
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sklenarova H, Krümpelmann A, Haun MW. et al. When do we need to care about the caregiver? Supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer 2015; 121: 1513-1519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ullrich A, Ascherfeld L, Marx G. et al. Quality of life, psychological burden, needs, and satisfaction during specialized inpatient palliative care in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients. BMC Palliat Care 2017; 16: 31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ullrich A, Marx G, Bergelt C. et al. Supportive care needs and service use during palliative care in family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a prospective longitudinal study. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29: 1303-1315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ullrich A, Theochari M, Bergelt C. et al. Ethical challenges in family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer – a qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19: 70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Weißflog G, Hönig K, Gündel H. et al. Associations between dyadic coping and supportive care needs: findings from a study with hematologic cancer patients and their partners. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25: 1445-1454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Morris JN, Martini A, Preen D. The well-being of children impacted by a parent with cancer: an integrative review. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24: 3235-3251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Shah BK, Armaly J, Swieter E. Impact of Parental Cancer on Children. Anticancer Res 2017; 37: 4025-4028
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Benson JJ, Oliver DP, Washington KT. et al. Online social support groups for informal caregivers of hospice patients with cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2020; 44: 101698
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hendrix CC, Bailey Jr DE, Steinhauser KE. et al. Effects of enhanced caregiver training program on cancer caregiver's self-efficacy, preparedness, and psychological well-being. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24: 327-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kent EE, Mollica MA, Dionne-Odom JN. et al. Effect of instrumental support on distress among family caregivers: Findings from a nationally representative study. Palliat Support Care 2020; 18: 519-527
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S. et al. Family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: A qualitative study of patient, family, and clinician attitudes and experiences. Patient Educ Couns 2016; 99: 1146-1155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Okado I, Pagano I, Cassel K. et al. Perceptions of care coordination in cancer patient-family caregiver dyads. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29: 2645-2652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wittenberg E, Xu J, Goldsmith J. et al. Caregiver Communication About Cancer: Development of a mhealth resource to support family caregiver communication burden. Psychooncology 2019; 28: 365-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Aoun SM, Rumbold B, Howting D. et al Bereavement support for family caregivers: The gap between guidelines and practice in palliative care. PloS one 2017; 12: e0184750-e0184750
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kent EE, Rowland JH, Northouse L. et al. Caring for caregivers and patients: Research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer 2016; 122: 1987-1995
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lambert SD, Ould Brahim L, Morrison M. et al. Priorities for caregiver research in cancer care: an international Delphi survey of caregivers, clinicians, managers, and researchers. Supportive Care Cancer 2019; 27: 805-817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Selman LE, Brighton LJ, Sinclair S. et al. Patients' and caregivers' needs, experiences, preferences and research priorities in spiritual care: A focus group study across nine countries. Palliat Med 2018; 32: 216-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Thomas TH, Campbell GB, Lee YJ. et al. Priorities to improve cancer caregiving: report of a caregiver stakeholder workshop. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29: 2423-2424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Dionne-Odom JN, Azuero A, Lyons KD. et al. Benefits of Early Versus Delayed Palliative Care to Informal Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Cancer: Outcomes From the ENABLE III Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 1446-1452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hui D, Hannon BL, Zimmermann C. et al. Improving patient and caregiver outcomes in oncology: Team-based, timely, and targeted palliative care. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 356-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ferrell BR, Temel JS, Temin S. et al. Integration of Palliative Care Into Standard Oncology Care: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: 96-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Jordan K, Aapro M, Kaasa S. et al. European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) position paper on supportive and palliative care. Ann Oncol 2018; 29: 36-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kaasa S, Loge JH, Aapro M. et al. Integration of oncology and palliative care: a Lancet Oncology Commission. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: e588-e653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 S3-Leitlinie Palliativmedizin für Patienten mit einer nicht heilbaren Krebserkrankung AWMF-Registernummer: 128/001OL 2015.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Berendt J, Oechsle K, Thomas M. et al. [State of integration of palliative care at Comprehensive Cancer Centers funded by German Cancer Aid]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2016; 141: e16-e23
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Stachura P, Berendt J, Stiel S. et al. [Standard operating procedures (SOPs) for palliative care: Presence and relevance of palliative SOPs within the network of German Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) funded by the German Cancer Aid]. Schmerz 2017; 31: 47-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Berendt J, Stiel S, Simon ST. et al. Integrating Palliative Care Into Comprehensive Cancer Centers: Consensus-Based Development of Best Practice Recommendations. The oncologist 2016; 21: 1241-1249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Gahr S, Lödel S, Berendt J. et al. Implementation of Best Practice Recommendations for Palliative Care in German Comprehensive Cancer Centers. The oncologist 2020; 25: e259-e265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Lödel S, Ostgathe C, Heckel M. et al. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Palliative Care in German Comprehensive Cancer Centers – an evaluation of the implementation status. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19: 62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Murtagh FE, Ramsenthaler C, Firth A. et al. A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS). Palliat Med 2019; 33: 1045-1057
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Stiel S, Matthes ME, Bertram L. et al. [Validation of the new version of the minimal documentation system (MIDOS) for patients in palliative care: the German version of the edmonton symptom assessment scale (ESAS)]. Schmerz 2010; 24: 596-604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yıldırım S, Kazaz SN, Semiz HS. et al. An Evaluation of the Information Sources of Cancer Patients' Relatives. A Prospective Survey. J Cancer Educ 2019; 34: 913-919 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1395-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Krumm N, Schmidlin E, Schulz C. et al. Kernkompetenzen in der Palliativversorgung – ein Weißbuch der European Association for Palliative Care zur Lehre in der Palliativversorgung. Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin 2015; 16: 152-167
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar