CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Sports Med Int Open 2021; 5(03): E81-E90
DOI: 10.1055/a-1553-7063
Orthopedics & Biomechanics

When Musical Accompaniment Allows the Preferred Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Movement

Analina Emmanouil
1   National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, Department of Sport Medicine and Biology of Exercise, Sport Biomechanics Lab, Daphne, Greece
,
Elissavet Rousanoglou
1   National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, Department of Sport Medicine and Biology of Exercise, Sport Biomechanics Lab, Daphne, Greece
,
Anastasia Georgaki
2   National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Department of Music Studies, Athens, Greece
,
Konstantinos D. Boudolos
1   National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, Department of Sport Medicine and Biology of Exercise, Sport Biomechanics Lab, Daphne, Greece
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

A musical accompaniment is often used in movement coordination and stability exercise modalities, although considered obstructive for their fundament of preferred movement pace. This study examined if the rhythmic strength of musical excerpts used in movement coordination and exercise modalities allows the preferred spatio-temporal pattern of movement. Voluntary and spontaneous body sway (70 s) were tested (N=20 young women) in a non-musical (preferred) and two rhythmic strength (RS) musical conditions (Higher:HrRS, Lower:LrRS). The center of pressure trajectory was used for the body sway spatio-temporal characteristics (Kistler forceplate, 100 Hz). Statistics included paired t-tests between each musical condition and the non-musical one, as well as between musical conditions (p≤0.05). Results indicated no significant difference between the musical and the non-musical conditions (p>0.05). The HrRS differed significantly from LrRS only in the voluntary body sway, with increased sway duration (p=0.03), center of pressure path (p=0.04) and velocity (p=0.01). The findings provide evidence-based support for the rhythmic strength recommendations in movement coordination and stability exercise modalities. The HrRS to LrRS differences in voluntary body sway most possibly indicate that low-frequency musical features rather than just tempo and pulse clarity are also important.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 23 February 2021
Received: 04 May 2021

Accepted: 11 May 2021

Article published online:
04 October 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Karageorghis CI, Priest DL. Music in the exercise domain: a review and synthesis. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol 2012; 5: 44-66
  • 2 Karageorghis CI, Priest DL. Music in the exercise domain: A review and synthesis. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol 2012; 5: 67-84
  • 3 Van Dyck E, Leman M. Ergogenic effect of music during running performance. Annals Sport Med Res 2016; 3: 1082
  • 4 Feiss R, Kostrna J, Scruggs JW. et al. Effects of music tempo on perceived exertion, attention, affect, heart rate, and performance during isometric strength exercise. J Sports Sci 2021; 39: 161-169
  • 5 Pilates HJ, Miller JW. Pilates’ Return to Life Through Contrology. Presentation Dynamics; 2012
  • 6 Isacowitz R, Clippinger K. Pilates Anatomy. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2020. 2nd Edition.
  • 7 Gonzalez-Sanchez VE, Zelechowska A, Jensenius AR. Correspondences between music and involuntary human micromotion during standstill. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 1382
  • 8 Jensenius AR, Zelechowska A, Gonzalez Sanchez VE. The musical influence on people's micromotion when standing still in groups. In: Proceedings of the Sound and Music Computing Conference, July 5–8, Espoo, Finland, 2017; 195–199
  • 9 Park SH, Lee K, Lockhart T. et al. Effects of sound on postural stability during quiet standing. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011; 8: 67
  • 10 Arbinaga F, Romero-Pérez N, Torres-Rosado L. et al. Influence of music on closed motor skills: a controlled study with novice female dart-throwers. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 4146
  • 11 Burger B, Toiviainen P. Embodiment in electronic dance music: Effects of musical content and structure on body movement. Musicae Scientiae 2018; 24: 1-20
  • 12 Blažević I, Vidulin S, Trajkovski B. The efficiency of exercising pilates to music genres. Sport Science 2015; 8: 16-25
  • 13 Burger B, Thompson MR, Luck G. et al. Influences of rhythm- and timbre-related musical features on characteristics of music-induced movement. Front Psychol 2013; 4: 183
  • 14 Burger B, Thompson MR, Luck G. et al. Hunting for the beat in the body: on period and phase locking in music-induced movement. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 7: 903
  • 15 Witek MAG, Clarke EF, Wallentin M. et al. Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PLoS One 2014; 9: e94446
  • 16 Kennedy-Armbruster CK, Yoke MM. Methods of Group Exercise Instruction. Human Kinetics, 3rd edition 2014: 60
  • 17 Burger B, London J, Thompson MR. et al. Synchronization to metrical levels in music depends on low-frequency spectral components and tempo. Psychol Res 2017; 82: 1195-1211
  • 18 Toiviainen P, Burunat I, Brattico E. et al. The chronnectome of musical beat. Neuroimage 2020; 216: 116191
  • 19 Madison G, Gouyon F, Ullén F. et al. Modeling the tendency for music to induce movement in humans: first correlations with low-level audio descriptors across music genres. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2011; 37: 1578-1594
  • 20 McPherson T, Berger D, Alagapan S. et al. Active and passive rhythmic music therapy interventions differentially modulate sympathetic autonomic nervous system activity. J Music Ther 2019; 56: 240-264
  • 21 Madison G, Paulin J. Ratings of speed in real music as a function of both original and manipulated beat tempo. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 128: 3032-3040
  • 22 Janata P, Tomic ST, Haberman JM. Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of the groove. J Exp Psychol Gen 2012; 141: 54-75
  • 23 Page P. Sensorimotor training: A “global” approach for balance training. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2006; 10: 77-84
  • 24 Freyler K, Krause A, Gollhofer A. et al. Specific stimuli induce specific adaptations: sensorimotor training vs. reactive balance training. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0167557
  • 25 Coste A, Salesse RN, Gueugnon M. et al. Standing or swaying to the beat: discrete auditory rhythms entrain stance and promote postural coordination stability. Gait Posture 2018; 59: 28-34
  • 26 Carrick FR, Oggero E, Pagnacco G. Posturographic changes associated with music listening. J Altern Complement Med 2007; 13: 519-526
  • 27 Forti S, Filipponi E, Di Berardino F. et al. The influence of music on static posturography. J Vestib Res 2010; 20: 351-356
  • 28 Ross JM, Warlaumont AS, Abney DH. et al. Influence of musical groove on postural sway. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2016; 42: 308-319
  • 29 Pagnacco G, Klotzek AS, Carrick FR. et al. Effect of tone-based sound stimulation on balance performance of normal subjects: preliminary investigation. Biomed Sci Instrum 2015; 51: 54-61
  • 30 Vereec KL, Wuyts F, Truijen S. et al. Clinical assessment of balance: normative data, and gender and age effects. Int J Audiol 2008; 47: 67-75
  • 31 Torres SF, Reis JG, Abreu DCC. Influence of gender and physical exercise on balance of healthy young adults. Fisioter Mov 2014; 27: 399-406
  • 32 Kim J, Kwon Y, Chung HY. et al. Relationship between body factors and postural sway during natural standing. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 2012; 13: 963-968
  • 33 Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls?. Age Ageing 2006; 35: ii7-ii11
  • 34 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
  • 35 Palm HG, Strobel J, Achatz G. et al. The role and interaction of visual and auditory afferents in postural stability. Gait Posture 2009; 30: 328-333
  • 36 Bigliassi M, Karageorghis CI, Nowicky AV. et al. Effects of auditory distraction on voluntary movements: exploring the underlying mechanisms associated with parallel processing. Psychol Res 2018; 82: 720-733
  • 37 Adkin AL, Carpenter MG. New insights on emotional contributions to human postural control. Front Neuro 2018; 9: 789
  • 38 Lartillot O, Toiviainen P. A Matlab toolbox for musical feature extraction from audio. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, Bordeaux, France 2007; 237: 244
  • 39 Etani T, Marui A, Kawase S. et al. Optimal tempo for groove: its relation to directions of body movement and Japanese nori. Front Psychol 2018; 10: 462
  • 40 Zelechowska A, Gonzalez-Sanchez VE, Laeng B. et al. Headphones or speakers? An exploratory study of their effects on spontaneous body movement to rhythmic music. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 698
  • 41 Duarte M, Zatsiorsky V. Effects of body lean and visual information on the equilibrium maintenance during stance. Exp Brain Res 2002; 146: 60-69
  • 42 Fiorelli C, Polastri P, Rodrigues S. et al. Gaze position interferes in body sway in young adults. Neurosci Lett 2017; 660: 130-134
  • 43 Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. London: Pearson; 2009: 585-616
  • 44 Lafond D, Corriveau H, Hébert R. et al. Intrasession reliability of center of pressure measures of postural steadiness in healthy elderly people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 896-901
  • 45 Raymakers J, Samson M, Verhaar H. The assessment of body sway and the choice of the stability parameters. Gait Posture 2005; 21: 48-58
  • 46 Varlet M, Williams R, Keller PE. Effects of pitch and tempo of auditory rhythms on spontaneous movement entrainment and stabilization. Psychol Res 2020; 84: 568-584
  • 47 Palmieri RM, Ingersoll CD, Stone MB. et al. Center-of-pressure parameters used in the assessment of postural control. J Sport Rehabil 2002; 11: 51-66
  • 48 Latash ML, Ferreira SS, Wieczorek SA. et al. Movement sway: changes in postural sway during voluntary shifts of the center of pressure. Exp Brain Res 2003; 150: 314-324
  • 49 Lubetzky AV, Gospodarek M, Arie L. et al. Auditory input and postural control in adults. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 146: 480-487
  • 50 Hainsworth S. Beat Tracking and Musical Metre Analysis. In: Klapuri A, Davy M. eds. Signal Processing Methods for Music Transcription. Boston: Springer; 2006: 101-129
  • 51 MacDougall HG, Moore ST. Marching to the beat of the same drummer: the spontaneous tempo of human locomotion. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99: 1164-1173
  • 52 Styns F, van Noorden L, Moelants D. et al. Walking on music. Hum Mov Sci 2007; 26: 769-785
  • 53 Moelants D. Preferred tempo reconsidered. In: Stevens C, Burnham D, McPherson G. et al. eds. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Sydney: Causal Productions; 2002: 580-583
  • 54 Bretherton B, Deuchars J, Windsor WL. The effects of controlled tempo manipulations on cardiovascular autonomic function. Music Science 2019; 2: 1-14
  • 55 Husain G, Thompson WF, Schellenberg EG. Effects of musical tempo and mode on arousal, mood, and spatial abilities. Music Percept 2002; 20: 151-171
  • 56 Hove MJ, Marie C, Bruce IC. et al. Superior time perception for lower musical pitch explains why bass-ranged instruments lay down musical rhythms. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2014; 111: 10383-10388
  • 57 Lenc T, Keller PE, Varlet M. et al. Neural tracking of the musical beat is enhanced by low-frequency sounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2018; 115: 8221-8226
  • 58 Repp BH. Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychon Bull Rev 2005; 12: 969-992