Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 2022; 32(01): 27-37
DOI: 10.1055/a-1577-9849
Original Article

Does Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Have an Additive Effect on Disability, Pain and Abdominal and Lumbar Muscle Thickness in Chronic Low Back Pain? – A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Study

Hat die neuromuskuläre Elektrostimulation eine additive Wirkung auf die Bewegungseinschränkung, die Schmerzintensität, die Lebensqualität und die Muskelkraft im Bauch- und Lendenbereich bei chronischen Rückenschmerzen? – Eine randomisierte, kontrollierte Doppelblindstudie
1   Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
2   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Dilber Karagozoglu Coskunsu
1   Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
3   Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Fenerbahce University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Zeynep Turan
2   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Ozden Ozyemisci Taskiran
2   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective To examine the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with core stabilization exercises (CSE) in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Methods Thirty-six patients (mean age 33.6±12.6 years) with CLBP were randomly assigned to 4 weeks (12 sessions) of NMES group (NMES combined with CSE) (n=18) vs. Control group (sham NMES and CSE) (n=18). After the 4 weeks, same exercises were given as home exercise program without NMES. The outcome measures were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and ultrasonography. Ultrasonography was used for measuring transversus abdominis (TrA), internal oblique (IO), external oblique (EO) muscles thickness and lumbar multifidus muscle thickness and area. Assessments were performed at baseline and 4th week and eighth week follow-up.

Results In both groups, the change of ODI, VAS and NHP values of the first measurement according to the values of the 4th week and the eighth week were found statistically significant (p=0.001; p<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in ODI, VAS and NHP scores between the 4th week and the eighth week in both groups (p>0.05). None of NMES and control group measurements with US showed a statistically significant increase in the TrA, IO, EO thickness and multifidus thickness and area (p>0.05).

Conclusions It was shown that NMES can be tolerated by patients with CLBP, but the addition of simultaneus NMES to CSE had no contribution to the clinical outcome measures.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Mit dieser Studie sollte die Wirkung der neuromuskulären Elektrostimulation (NMES) in Kombination mit Übungen zur Kräftigung der Rumpfmuskulatur bei Patienten mit chronischen Schmerzen der Lendenwirbelsäule untersucht werden.

Methoden Sechsunddreißig Patienten (Durchschnittsalter 33,6 ± 12,6 Jahre) mit chronischen Schmerzen der Lendenwirbelsäule wurden nach dem Zufallsprinzip einer vierwöchigen Therapie (12 Sitzungen) der NMES-Gruppe (NMES kombiniert mit Rumpfkräftigung) (n=18) oder der Kontrollgruppe (Schein-NMES und Rumpfkräftigung) (n=18) zugeteilt. Nach vier Wochen wurden dieselben Übungen als Heimübungsprogramm ohne NMES durchgeführt. Die Ergebnisse wurden anhand des Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), der visuellen Analogskala (VAS), des Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) und einer Ultraschalluntersuchung evaluiert. Mittels Ultraschalls wurden die Dicke des M. transversus abdominis, M. obliquus internus und externus sowie die Dicke und Fläche des lumbalen Multifidus-Muskels gemessen. Die Untersuchungen wurden zu Beginn der Studie sowie nach der vierten und achten Woche durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse In beiden Gruppen war die Veränderung der ODI-, VAS- und NHP-Werte der ersten Messung im Vergleich zu den Werten der vierten und achten Woche statistisch signifikant (p=0,001; p<0,01). Es gab in beiden Gruppen keine statistisch signifikanten Unterschiede bei den ODI-, VAS- und NHP-Werten zwischen der vierten und achten Woche (p>0,05). Keine der Ultraschall-Messungen der NMES- und der Kontrollgruppe zeigten eine statistisch signifikante Zunahme der drei seitlichen Bauchwandmuskeln und der Dicke und Fläche des Multifidus-Muskels (p>0,05).

Schlussfolgerungen Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass die neuromuskuläre Elektrostimulation (NMES) bei Patienten mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen durchgeführt werden kann, jedoch zeigte sich keine Wirkung auf die klinischen Ergebnisse, wenn zusätzlich zu Rumpfstabilisierungsübungen simultan eine neuromuskuläre Elektrostimulation durchgeführt wurde.



Publication History

Received: 18 January 2021

Accepted: 06 July 2021

Article published online:
10 September 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Clark S, Horton R. Low back pain: a major global challenge. Lancet 2018; 391: 2302 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30725-6
  • 2 Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J 2018; 27: 2791-2803 doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2
  • 3 Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM. et al. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2017; 166: 514-530 doi:10.7326/M16-2367
  • 4 Jorgensen JE, Afzali T, Riis A. Effect of differentiating exercise guidance based on a patient’s level of low back pain in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e019742 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019742
  • 5 O’Connell NE, Cook CE, Wand BM. et al. Clinical guidelines for low back pain: A critical review of consensus and inconsistencies across 3 major guidelines. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2016; 30: 968-980 doi:10.1016/j.berh.2017.05.001
  • 6 Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D. et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet 2018; 391: 2368-2383 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6
  • 7 Joyce AA, Kotler DH. Core Training in Low Back Disorders: Role of the Pilates Method. Curr Sports Med Rep 2017; 16: 156-161 doi:10.1249/JSR.0000000000000365
  • 8 Saragiotto BT, Maher CG, Yamato TP. et al. Motor Control Exercise for Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Cochrane Review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016; 41: 1284-1295 doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001645
  • 9 Lepley LK, Wojtys EM, Palmieri-Smith RM. Combination of eccentric exercise and neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve quadriceps function post-ACL reconstruction. Knee 2015; 22: 270-277 doi:10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.013
  • 10 Coghlan S, Crowe L, McCarthypersson U. et al. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation training results in enhanced activation of spinal stabilizing muscles during spinal loading and improvements in pain ratings. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011; 2011: 7622-7625 doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091878
  • 11 Alrwaily M, Schneider M, Sowa G. et al. Stabilization exercises combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther 2019; 23: 506-515 doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.10.003
  • 12 Hicks GE, Sions JM, Velasco TO. et al. Trunk Muscle Training Augmented With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Appears to Improve Function in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Preliminary Trial. Clin J Pain 2016; 32: 898-906 doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000348
  • 13 Yakut E, Duger T, Oksuz C. et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 581-585 discussion 585. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000113869.13209.03
  • 14 Ostelo RW, de Vet HC. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005; 19: 593-607 doi:10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.003
  • 15 Ohnhaus EE, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1975; 1: 379-384 doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90075-5
  • 16 Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J. et al. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med A 1981; 15: 221-229 doi:10.1016/0271-7123(81)90005-5
  • 17 Kucukdeveci AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay S. et al. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res 2000; 23: 31-38 doi:10.1097/00004356-200023010-00004
  • 18 Hodges PW. Ultrasound imaging in rehabilitation: just a fad?. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35: 333-337 doi:10.2519/jospt.2005.0106
  • 19 Wilson A, Hides JA, Blizzard L. et al. Measuring ultrasound images of abdominal and lumbar multifidus muscles in older adults: A reliability study. Man Ther 2016; 23: 114-119 doi:10.1016/j.math.2016.01.004
  • 20 Teymuri Z, Hosseinifar M, Sirousi M. The Effect of Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Disability, and Pelvic Floor Muscle Function in Postpartum Lumbopelvic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 97: 885-891 doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000000993
  • 21 Schafer T, Schwarz MA. The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 813 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00813
  • 22 Doucet BM, Lam A, Griffin L. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for skeletal muscle function. Yale J Biol Med 2012; 85: 201-215
  • 23 Nussbaum EL, Houghton P, Anthony J. et al. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Muscle Impairment: Critical Review and Recommendations for Clinical Practice. Physiother Can 2017; 69: 1-76 doi:10.3138/ptc.2015-88
  • 24 Baek SO, Ahn SH, Jones R. et al. Activations of deep lumbar stabilizing muscles by transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation of lumbar paraspinal regions. Ann Rehabil Med 2014; 38: 506-513 doi:10.5535/arm.2014.38.4.506
  • 25 Hides J, Stanton W, Mendis MD. et al. The relationship of transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus clinical muscle tests in patients with chronic low back pain. Man Ther 2011; 16: 573-577 doi:10.1016/j.math.2011.05.007
  • 26 Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L. et al. The functional coupling of the deep abdominal and paraspinal muscles: the effects of simulated paraspinal muscle contraction on force transfer to the middle and posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia. J Anat 2014; 225: 447-462 doi:10.1111/joa.12227
  • 27 [Anonym]. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 975-991 doi:10.1097/00005768-199806000-00032
  • 28 Guo P, Wang JW, Tong A. Therapeutic effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for treating patients with chronic low back pain. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e13197 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000013197
  • 29 Nijs J, Clark J, Malfliet A. et al. In the spine or in the brain? Recent advances in pain neuroscience applied in the intervention for low back pain. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2017; 35: 108-115
  • 30 Luz MSS R, Evaldt AS, Matos LDS. et al. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation associated with core stability exercises in nonspecific postural low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal 2019; 9: 446-456 doi:10.32098/mltj.03.2019.20
  • 31 Roussel NA, Nijs J, Meeus M. et al. Central sensitization and altered central pain processing in chronic low back pain: fact or myth?. Clin J Pain 2013; 29: 625-638 doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31826f9a71