Thromb Haemost 2022; 122(07): 1177-1185
DOI: 10.1055/a-1693-0063
Stroke, Systemic or Venous Thromboembolism

Validation of Risk Assessment Models Predicting Venous Thromboembolism in Inpatients with Acute Exacerbation Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter Cohort Study in China

Chen Zhou*
1   West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
,
Qun Yi*
2   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
,
Huiqing Ge
3   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
,
Hailong Wei
4   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, People's Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan Province, China
,
Huiguo Liu
5   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
,
Jianchu Zhang
6   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
,
Yuanming Luo
7   State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
,
Pinhua Pan
8   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
,
Jiarui Zhang
2   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
,
Lige Peng
2   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
,
Adila Aili
2   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
,
Yu Liu
2   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
,
Maoyun Wang
2   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
,
Yongjiang Tang
2   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
,
Lan Wang
2   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
,
Xia Zhong
1   West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
,
Yixi Wang
1   West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
,
2   Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
,
On behalf of the MAGNET AECOPD Registry Investigators › Author Affiliations
Funding This study was supported by National Key Research Program of China (grant numbers: 2016yfc1304202 and 2016yfc1304200) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (for young scholars, grant 81800016).

Abstract

Background Inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE); however, the prophylaxis for VTE is largely underused in China. Identifying high-risk patients requiring thromboprophylaxis is critical to reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with VTE. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the validities of the Padua Prediction Score and Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) in predicting the risk of VTE in inpatients with AECOPD in China.

Methods The inpatients with AECOPD were prospectively enrolled from seven medical centers of China between September 2017 and January 2020. Caprini and Padua scores were calculated on admission, and the incidence of 3-month VTE was investigated.

Results Among the 3,277 eligible patients with AECOPD, 128 patients (3.9%) developed VTE within 3 months after admission. The distribution of the study population by the Caprini risk level was as follows: high, 53.6%; moderate, 43.0%; and low, 3.5%. The incidence of VTE increased by risk level as high, 6.1%; moderate, 1.5%; and low, 0%. According to the Padua RAM, only 10.9% of the study population was classified as high risk and 89.1% as low risk, with the corresponding incidence of VTE of 7.9 and 3.4%, respectively. The Caprini RAM had higher area under curve compared with the Padua RAM (0.713 ± 0.021 vs. 0.644 ± 0.023, p = 0.029).

Conclusion The Caprini RAM was superior to the Padua RAM in predicting the risk of VTE in inpatients with AECOPD and might better guide thromboprophylaxis in these patients.

Note

Haixia Zhou is the guarantor of the whole content of the manuscript. Chinese Clinical Trail Registry No.: ChiCTR2100044625; URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=121626.


Author Contributions

C.Z., Q.Y., and H.Z. contributed to the design of the study, the analysis and interpretation of data, and drafted the manuscript. All other authors contributed to acquisition and interpretation of data, and reviewed the manuscript. We appreciate the support and collaboration of the co-investigators participating in MAGNET AECOPD Registry study.


* Drs. Chen Zhou and Qun Yi contributed equally to this manuscript.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 30 May 2021

Accepted: 02 November 2021

Accepted Manuscript online:
10 November 2021

Article published online:
20 January 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Aleva FE, Voets LWLM, Simons SO, de Mast Q, van der Ven AJAM, Heijdra YF. Prevalence and localization of pulmonary embolism in unexplained acute exacerbations of COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2017; 151 (03) 544-554
  • 2 Ko FW, Chan KP, Hui DS. et al. Acute exacerbation of COPD. Respirology 2016; 21 (07) 1152-1165
  • 3 Rizkallah J, Man SFP, Sin DD. Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in acute exacerbations of COPD: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Chest 2009; 135 (03) 786-793
  • 4 Pang H, Wang L, Liu J. et al. The prevalence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Respir J 2018; 12 (11) 2573-2580
  • 5 Kubota Y, London SJ, Cushman M. et al. Lung function, respiratory symptoms and venous thromboembolism risk: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. J Thromb Haemost 2016; 14 (12) 2394-2401
  • 6 Morgan AD, Herrett E, De Stavola BL, Smeeth L, Quint JK. COPD disease severity and the risk of venous thromboembolic events: a matched case-control study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2016; 11: 899-908
  • 7 Børvik T, Brækkan SK, Enga K. et al. COPD and risk of venous thromboembolism and mortality in a general population. Eur Respir J 2016; 47 (02) 473-481
  • 8 Dentali F, Douketis JD, Gianni M, Lim W, Crowther MA. Meta-analysis: anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146 (04) 278-288
  • 9 Liu X, Liu C, Chen X, Wu W, Lu G. Comparison between Caprini and Padua risk assessment models for hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: a retrospective study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 23 (04) 538-543
  • 10 Fraisse F, Holzapfel L, Couland JM. et al; The Association of Non-University Affiliated Intensive Care Specialist Physicians of France. Nadroparin in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in acute decompensated COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161 (4, Pt 1): 1109-1114
  • 11 Kahn SR, Lim W, Dunn AS. et al. Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 (2, Suppl): e195S-e226S
  • 12 Agusti A, Beasley R, Celli BR, Chen R, Criner G, Halpin D. Global invitation of chronic obstructive lung disease: Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease (2021 report). 2021
  • 13 Zhai Z, Kan Q, Li W. et al; DissolVE-2 investigators. VTE risk profiles and prophylaxis in medical and surgical inpatients: the identification of chinese hospitalized patients' risk profile for venous thromboembolism (DissolVE-2)-a cross-sectional study. Chest 2019; 155 (01) 114-122
  • 14 Tapson VF, Decousus H, Pini M. et al; IMPROVE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: findings from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism. Chest 2007; 132 (03) 936-945
  • 15 Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF. et al; ENDORSE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet 2008; 371 (9610): 387-394
  • 16 Baser O, Liu X, Phatak H. et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and clinical consequences in medically ill patients. Am J Ther 2013; 20 (02) 132-142
  • 17 Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V. et al. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8 (11) 2450-2457
  • 18 Caprini JA. Thrombosis risk assessment as a guide to quality patient care. Dis Mon 2005; 51 (2–3): 70-78
  • 19 Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 (2, Suppl): e419S-e496S
  • 20 Mahan CE, Liu Y, Turpie AG. et al. External validation of a risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism in the hospitalised acutely-ill medical patient (VTE-VALOURR). Thromb Haemost 2014; 112 (04) 692-699
  • 21 Woller SC, Stevens SM, Jones JP. et al. Derivation and validation of a simple model to identify venous thromboembolism risk in medical patients. Am J Med 2011; 124 (10) 947.e2-954.e2
  • 22 Spyropoulos AC, Anderson Jr FA, FitzGerald G. et al; IMPROVE Investigators. Predictive and associative models to identify hospitalized medical patients at risk for VTE. Chest 2011; 140 (03) 706-714
  • 23 Cohen AT, Alikhan R, Arcelus JI. et al. Assessment of venous thromboembolism risk and the benefits of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients. Thromb Haemost 2005; 94 (04) 750-759
  • 24 Caprini JA. Individual risk assessment is the best strategy for thromboembolic prophylaxis. Dis Mon 2010; 56 (10) 552-559
  • 25 Soomro Q, Yousuf N, Bhutto AA, Abro HA, Memon AA. Venous thromboembolism (VTE): risk assessment in hospitalized patients. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2014; 24 (07) 455-458
  • 26 Zakai NA, Wright J, Cushman M. Risk factors for venous thrombosis in medical inpatients: validation of a thrombosis risk score. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2 (12) 2156-2161
  • 27 Stolz D, Barandun J, Borer H. et al. Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of stable COPD and acute exacerbations of COPD: the Swiss Recommendations 2018. Respiration 2018; 96 (04) 382-398
  • 28 Grant PJ, Greene MT, Chopra V, Bernstein SJ, Hofer TP, Flanders SA. Assessing the Caprini Score for risk assessment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Am J Med 2016; 129 (05) 528-535
  • 29 Lederle FA, Zylla D, MacDonald R, Wilt TJ. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients and those with stroke: a background review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155 (09) 602-615
  • 30 Rothberg MB, Lindenauer PK, Lahti M, Pekow PS, Selker HP. Risk factor model to predict venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. J Hosp Med 2011; 6 (04) 202-209
  • 31 Moumneh T, Riou J, Douillet D. et al. Validation of risk assessment models predicting venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical inpatients: a cohort study. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18 (06) 1398-1407
  • 32 Bo H, Li Y, Liu G. et al. Assessing the risk for development of deep vein thrombosis among Chinese patients using the 2010 Caprini Risk Assessment Model: a prospective multicenter study. J Atheroscler Thromb 2020; 27 (08) 801-808
  • 33 Vardi M, Ghanem-Zoubi NO, Zidan R, Yurin V, Bitterman H. Venous thromboembolism and the utility of the Padua Prediction Score in patients with sepsis admitted to internal medicine departments. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11 (03) 467-473
  • 34 Cobben MRR, Nemeth B, Lijfering WM. et al. Validation of risk assessment models for venous thrombosis in hospitalized medical patients. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2019; 3 (02) 217-225
  • 35 Nendaz M, Spirk D, Kucher N. et al. Multicentre validation of the Geneva Risk Score for hospitalised medical patients at risk of venous thromboembolism. Explicit ASsessment of Thromboembolic RIsk and Prophylaxis for Medical PATients in SwitzErland (ESTIMATE). Thromb Haemost 2014; 111 (03) 531-538
  • 36 Zhou H, Hu Y, Li X. et al. Assessment of the risk of venous thromboembolism in medical inpatients using the Padua Prediction Score and Caprini Risk Assessment Model. J Atheroscler Thromb 2018; 25 (11) 1091-1104
  • 37 Chen X, Pan L, Deng H. et al. Risk assessment in Chinese hospitalized patients comparing the Padua and Caprini scoring algorithms. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2018; 24 (9, Suppl): 127S-135S
  • 38 Bahl V, Hu HM, Henke PK, Wakefield TW, Campbell Jr DA, Caprini JA. A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method. Ann Surg 2010; 251 (02) 344-350
  • 39 Righini M. Is it worth diagnosing and treating distal deep vein thrombosis? No. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5 (Suppl. 01) 55-59