Bibliometric Analysis of Research Areas, Publication Hierarchy and Gender Authorship in German University Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract

Background The aim of the present bibliometric study was to record the focus of publications, type of study and publication activities depending on the hierarchy level and gender of the authors of German university departments for orthopaedic surgery.

Material and Methods The publication performance of the staff surgeons, consisting of chief and senior physicians, section and division heads of 39 German university departments of orthopaedic surgery university hospitals, was recorded over a period of 10 years (January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019). All publications were considered that were listed in PubMed and for which the staff surgeons were first or last authors. In addition, the impact factor (IF) and the h-index were determined.

Results 1739 (39.2%) publications were compiled by 180 staff surgeons of university departments for trauma surgery and 2699 (60.8%) publications by 343 surgeons in departments of orthopaedics and trauma surgery. Most publications were related to injuries or impairments of the lower extremity including the hip (n = 1626; 38.1%), followed by the upper extremity (n = 737; 17.3%). These publications focussed on diagnostic testing (25.5%), surgical techniques (19.1%) or special osteosyntheses (16.9%). The highest average IF per publication was achieved by publications on plastics (IF 2.02), on outcome (IF 1.96) and on diagnostic testing (IF 1.93). Heads of departments were first authors in 18.8%, senior physicians with management functions in 40.7% and senior physicians without management functions in 69% of papers and last authors in 81.2%, 49.3% and 31.0% of articles, respectively. 64 of 523 staff surgeons (12.2%) were women. 306 authors (6.1%) were women, corresponding to 4.8 authorships per female surgeon – significantly for male surgeons (10.3 authorships per male surgeon).

Conclusion In the present study, among senior physicians with a management function, the share of publishing surgeons was 59.1% for women, but 85.5% for men. In contrast, in the group of senior physicians without management function female and male surgeons were almost equally represented (57.5% vs. 60.5%). It must therefore be asked whether the work life balance is more difficult to meet for women than for men with longer careers. Mentoring programs are required to support the publication activities of the increasing number of female applicants in the future.

Keywords

orthopaedic trauma - bibliometric analysis - university hospitals - author hierarchy - women

Publication History

Received: 15 July 2021

Accepted after revision: 15 December 2021

Article published online:
10 March 2022

• Literatur

• 1 Statistisches Bundesamt. Die 20 häufigsten Operationen insgesamt (OPS 5). 2020 Accessed June 01, 2021 at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Gesundheit/Krankenhaeuser/Tabellen/drg-operationen-insgesamt.html
• 2 Mittelmeier W, Josten C, Siebert HR, Niethard FU, Marzi I, Klüß D. Forschung in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie – Bestandsaufnahme und Ausblick. Weißbuch Forschung in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie e. V.; 2012. https://dgou.de/fileadmin/dgou/dgou/Dokumente/Wissenschaft/DGOU_Weissbuch_Bestandsaufnahme_und_Ausblick.pdf
• 3 Debus ES, Haffke F, Grundmann RT. Analyse der Publikationsleistung der deutschen universitären Gefäßchirurgie in verschiedenen Organisationsstrukturen. Gefässchirurgie 2019; 24: 239-246 DOI: 10.1007/s00772-019-0518-9.
• 4 Haffke F, Debus ES, Grundmann RT. Publikationsleistung der deutschen akademischen Gefäßchirurgie – Journale, Impactfaktoren und Schwerpunktthemen. Chirurg 2019; 90: 660-667 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-018-0782-3. (PMID: 30610260)
• 5 Schubert CD, Leitsch S, Haertnagl F. et al. Vorteil durch Eigenständigkeit? Analyse der Publikationsleistung der universitären Plastischen Chirurgie in verschiedenen Organisationsstrukturen. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2015; 47: 213-221 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1555954.
• 6 SCImago. SJR — SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Portal]. Accessed March 01, 2021 at: http://www.scimagojr.com
• 7 Lutz PM, Lenz J, Achtnich A. et al. Ärztinnen in der Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie in Deutschland: ein aktueller Status quo. Orthopäde 2020; DOI: 10.1007/s00132-020-04048-7.
• 8 Brinker AR, Liao JL, Kraus KR. et al. Bibliometric Analysis of Gender Authorship Trends and Collaboration Dynamics Over 30 Years of Spine 1985 to 2015. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018; 43: E849-E854 DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002562. (PMID: 29438219)
• 9 Chatterjee P, Werner RM. Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4: e2114509 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14509. (PMID: 34213560)
• 10 King MM, Bergstrom CT, Correll SJ. et al. Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time. Socius 2017; DOI: 10.1177/2378023117738903.
• 11 Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach. Elternschaft heute – Eine Repräsentativbefragung von Eltern unter 18-jähriger Kinder. Accessed December 01, 2021 at: https://www.ifd-allensbach.de/fileadmin/IfD/sonstige_pdfs/8214_Elternschaft_heute.pdf
• 12 Statistisches Bundesamt DESTATIS. Elterngeld 2020: Väteranteil steigt auf knapp 25%. Pressemitteilung Nr. 146 vom 25.03.2021. Accessed December 01, 2021 at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2021/03/PD21_146_22922.html
• 13 Welcker K, Ansorg J. Kind oder Karriere – oder vielleicht beides?. 01.10.2010 Accessed December 10, 2021 at: https://www.bdc.de/kind-oder-karriere-oder-vielleicht-beides-2
• 14 Eckle VS, Zacharowski K, Koch T. et al. Habilitationen als Kriterium für akademische Produktivität medizinischer Fakultäten: eine vergleichende Analyse mehrerer Fachdisziplinen. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2019; 149: 40-48 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.12.002. (PMID: 31932253)
• 15 Rohde RS, Wolf JM, Adams JE. Where Are the Women in Orthopaedic Surgery?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474: 1950-1956 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4827-y. (PMID: 27090259)
• 16 Brown MA, Erdman MK, Munger AM. et al. Despite Growing Number of Women Surgeons, Authorship Gender Disparity in Orthopaedic Literature Persists Over 30 Years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478: 1542-1552 DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000849. (PMID: 31283733)
• 17 Loder RT, Kacena MA, Ogbemudia B. et al. Bibliometric Analysis of the English Musculoskeletal Literature over the Last 30 Years. ScientificWorldJournal 2021; 2021: 5548481 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5548481. (PMID: 33994881)
• 18 Wininger AE, Fischer JP, Likine EF. et al. Bibliometric Analysis of Female Authorship Trends and Collaboration Dynamics Over JBMR’s 30-Year History. J Bone Miner Res 2017; 32: 2405-2414 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3232. (PMID: 28777473)