Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-1741-9919
Statistische Inferenz mittels Schätzung: Empfehlungen der International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors

In der Gesundheitsforschung, einschließlich des Bereichs der Physiotherapie, werden häufig statistische Nullhypothesentests angewendet [1] [2]. Trotz ihres weit verbreiteten Einsatzes unterliegen statistische Nullhypothesentests jedoch bedeutenden Einschränkungen. Dieses gemeinschaftlich herausgegebene Editorial erklärt Inferenzstatistik unter Verwendung von statistischen Nullhypothesentests und die mit diesem Ansatz verbundenen Probleme. Es untersucht außerdem einen alternativen Ansatz für statistische Inferenz (der als Schätzen bezeichnet wird) und ermutigt Leser*innen physiotherapeutischer Forschung, sich mit Schätzmethoden und der Interpretation ihrer Ergebnisse vertraut zu machen. Darüber hinaus macht das Editorial Forschende darauf aufmerksam, dass einige Mitglieder der International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors (ISPJE) zukünftig Manuskripte erwarten, in denen Schätzmethoden anstelle statistischer Nullhypothesentests verwendet werden.[1]
Publication History
Article published online:
07 June 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Nickerson RS. Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychol Methods 2000; 5: 241-301
- 2 Freire APCF, Elkins MR, Ramos EM. et al. Use of 95% confidence intervals in the reporting of between-group differences in randomized controlled trials: analysis of a representative sample of 200 physical therapy trials. Braz J Phys Ther 2019; 23: 302-310
- 3 Altman DG, Bland JM. Uncertainty and sampling error. BMJ 2014; 349: g7064
- 4 Barnett V. Comparative Statistical Inference. London, New York: Wiley; 1973
- 5 Royall RM. Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm. 1st ed.. London, New York: Chapman & Hall; 1997
- 6 Gigerenzer G. The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1989
- 7 Goodman SN, Royall R. Evidence and scientific research. Am J Public Health 1988; 78: 1568-1574
- 8 Ziliak S, McCloskey D. The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives. Ann Arbor, USA: University of Michigan Press; 2008
- 9 Hubbard R. Corrupt Research: The Case for Reconceptualizing Empirical Management and Social Science. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage; 2016
- 10 Herbert RD. How to estimate treatment effects from reports of clinical trials. I: Continuous outcomes. Aust J Physiother 2000; 46: 229-235
- 11 Maher CG, Sherrington C, Elkins M. et al. Challenges for evidence-based physical therapy: accessing and interpreting high-quality evidence on therapy. Phys Ther 2004; 84: 644-654
- 12 Yi D, Ma D, Li G. et al. Statistical use in clinical studies: is there evidence of a methodological shift?. PLoS one 2015; 10: e0140159
- 13 Wasserstein RL, Schirm AL, Lazar NA. Moving to a world beyond “p < 0.05”. Am Stat 2019; 73: 1-19
- 14 Herbert RD. How to estimate treatment effects from reports of clinical trials. II: Dichotomous outcomes. Aust J Physiother 2000; 46: 309-313
- 15 Sim J, Reid N. Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization. Phys Ther 1999; 79: 186-195
- 16 Rothman KJ. Disengaging from statistical significance. Eur J Epidemiol 2016; 31: 443-444
- 17 Cumming G. Multivariate applications series. New York: Routledge; 2012
- 18 Kamper SJ. Showing confidence (intervals). Braz J Phys Ther 2019; 23: 277
- 19 Kamper SJ. Confidence intervals: linking evidence to practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019; 49: 763-764
- 20 Fidler F, Thomason N, Cumming G. et al. Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can’t make them think: Statistical reform lessons from medicine. Psychol Sci 2004; 15: 119-126
- 21 R Core Team, Hrsg. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2020. Im Internet (Stand: 01.12.2021): www.R-project.org/
- 22 RStudio Team, Hrsg. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, USA; 2019. Im Internet (Stand: 01.12.2021): www.rstudio.com/
- 23 Ferreira M. Research Note: The smallest worthwhile effect of a health intervention. J Physiother 2018; 64: 272-274
- 24 Amrhein V, Greenland S, McShane B. Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature 2019; 567: 305-307
- 25 Herbert R. Research Note: Significance testing and hypothesis testing: meaningless, misleading and mostly unnecessary. J Physiother 2019; 65: 178-181
- 26 Herbert RD, Jamtvedt G, Mead J. et al. Practical Evidence-Based Physiotherapy. 2. Aufl.. Oxford: Elsevier; 2011
- 27 Boos DD, Stefanski LA. P-Value Precision and Reproducibility. Am Stat 2011; 65: 213-221
- 28 Wasserstein R, Lazar N. The ASA’s Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. Am Stat 2016; 70: 129-133
- 29 International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, Hrsg. ICMJE recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. 2013 Im Internet (Stand: 01.12.2021): www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
- 30 McGough JJ, Faraone SV. Estimating the size of treatment effects: moving beyond p values. Psychiatry 2009; 6: 21
- 31 Hayat MJ, Chandrasekhar R, Dietrich MS. et al. Moving Otology Beyond p < 0.05. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41: 578-579
- 32 Hayat MJ, Staggs VS, Schwartz TA. et al. Moving nursing beyond p < .05. Res Nurs Health 2019; 42: 244-245
- 33 Cumming G, Fidler F, Kalinowski P. et al. The statistical recommendations of the American Psychological Association Publication Manual: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta‐analysis. Aust J Psychol 2012; 64: 138-146
- 34 Calin-Jageman RJ, Cumming G. Estimation for better inference in neuroscience. eNeuro 2019; 6
- 35 Schreiber JB. New paradigms for considering statistical significance: A way forward for health services research journals, their authors, and their readership. Res Social Adm Pharm 2020; 16: 591-594
- 36 Erickson RA, Rattner BA. Moving beyond p < 0.05 in ecotoxicology: A guide for practitioners. Environ Toxicol Chem 2020; 39: 1657-1669
- 37 Smith RJ. P > .05: The incorrect interpretation of “not significant” results is a significant problem. Am J Phys Anthropol 2020; 172: 521-527
- 38 Du Sert NP, Ahluwalia A, Alam S. et al. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS biology 2020; 18: e3000411