CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Hamostaseologie 2023; 43(03): 171-178
DOI: 10.1055/a-1796-8652
Original Article

A Comparison of Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time and Activated Coagulation Time for Anticoagulation Monitoring during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy

Ying Liu
1   Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
,
Zhiyong Yuan
1   Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
,
Xiaoning Han
1   Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
,
Kai Song
2   School of Mathematics and Statistics, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
,
Jinyan Xing
1   Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
› Author Affiliations
Funding This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Abstract

Background Unfractionated heparin is used to prevent coagulation activation in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. We designed this study to determine the preferable indicator for anticoagulation monitoring.

Methods We conducted a retrospective study and divided the patients into an activated coagulation time (ACT)-target group and an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-target group. The correlations between ACT, aPTT, and the heparin dose were explored.

Results Thirty-six patients were included (19 aPTT-target and 17 ACT-target patients); a total of 555 matched pairs of ACT/aPTT results were obtained. The correlation between the ACT and aPTT measurements was Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient (rs) = 0.518 in all 555 pairs. The Bland–Altman plot showed data points outside the displayed range (51.2–127.7), suggesting that the agreement between ACT and aPTT was poor. The aPTT group had fewer heparin dose changes (2.12 ± 0.68 vs. 2.57 ± 0.64, p = 0.05) and a lower cumulative heparin dose (317.6 ± 108.5 vs. 396.3 ± 144.3, p = 0.00) per day than the ACT group. There was no difference in serious bleeding (9 vs. 5; p = 0.171) or embolism events (3 vs. 3; p = 1.0) or in the red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma transfusion volumes between the ACT- and aPTT-target groups. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the ECMO duration (9 [4–15] days vs. 4 [3–14] days; p = 0.124) or length of ICU hospitalization (17 [5–32] days vs. 13 [4–21] days; p = 0.451) between the groups.

Conclusion The correlation between ACT and aPTT and the heparin dose was poor. The aPTT group had fewer daily heparin dose changes and a lower cumulative heparin dose per day than the ACT group, with no more bleeding and thrombotic events. Therefore, we recommend aPTT rather than ACT to adjust heparin dose in the absence of better monitoring indicators.



Publication History

Received: 20 September 2021

Accepted: 11 March 2022

Article published online:
26 July 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Esper SA, Levy JH, Waters JH, Welsby IJ. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the adult: a review of anticoagulation monitoring and transfusion. Anesth Analg 2014; 118 (04) 731-743
  • 2 Thiagarajan RR, Barbaro RP, Rycus PT. et al; ELSO Member Centers. Extracorporeal life support organization registry international report 2016. ASAIO J 2017; 63 (01) 60-67
  • 3 Vaquer S, de Haro C, Peruga P, Oliva JC, Artigas A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of complications and mortality of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care 2017; 7 (01) 51
  • 4 Winkler AM. Managing the precarious hemostatic balance during extracorporeal life support: implications for coagulation laboratories. Semin Thromb Hemost 2017; 43 (03) 291-299
  • 5 Oliver WC. Anticoagulation and coagulation management for ECMO. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009; 13 (03) 154-175
  • 6 Dalton HJ, Reeder R, Garcia-Filion P. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. Factors associated with bleeding and thrombosis in children receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 196 (06) 762-771
  • 7 Mazzeffi M, Greenwood J, Tanaka K. et al. Bleeding, transfusion, and mortality on extracorporeal life support: ECLS working group on thrombosis and hemostasis. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 101 (02) 682-689
  • 8 Cheng R, Hachamovitch R, Kittleson M. et al. Complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of 1,866 adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97 (02) 610-616
  • 9 Rastan AJ, Lachmann N, Walther T. et al. Autopsy findings in patients on postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Int J Artif Organs 2006; 29 (12) 1121-1131
  • 10 Murphy DA, Hockings LE, Andrews RK. et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-hemostatic complications. Transfus Med Rev 2015; 29 (02) 90-101
  • 11 The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). ELSO Anticoagulation Guideline. . Ann Arbor, MI; 2014: 17
  • 12 Lorusso R, Whitman G, Milojevic M. et al. 2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS Expert Consensus on post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support in adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 111 (01) 327-369
  • 13 Chinese Society of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesiology, Chinese Society of Anesthesiology, Chinese Association of Anesthesiologists, et al. Expert consensus on the clinical application of adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation under different conditions (2020 edition). Chinese Circulation J 2020; 35: 1052
  • 14 Samuel S, Allison TA, Sharaf S. et al. Antifactor Xa levels vs. activated partial thromboplastin time for monitoring unfractionated heparin. A pilot study. J Clin Pharm Ther 2016; 41 (05) 499-502
  • 15 Cunningham D, Besser MW, Giraud K, Gerrard C, Vuylsteke A. Agreement between ACT and aPTT during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation shows intra- and inter-individual variation. Perfusion 2016; 31 (06) 503-507
  • 16 Simko RJ, Tsung FF, Stanek EJ. Activated clotting time versus activated partial thromboplastin time for therapeutic monitoring of heparin. Ann Pharmacother 1995; 29 (10) 1015-1021 , quiz 1061
  • 17 Smythe MA, Koerber JM, Nowak SN. et al. Correlation between activated clotting time and activated partial thromboplastin times. Ann Pharmacother 2002; 36 (01) 7-11
  • 18 Selleng S, Malowsky B, Strobel U. et al. Early-onset and persisting thrombocytopenia in post-cardiac surgery patients is rarely due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, even when antibody tests are positive. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8 (01) 30-36
  • 19 Peek GJ, Firmin RK. The inflammatory and coagulative response to prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J 1999; 45 (04) 250-263
  • 20 Atallah S, Liebl M, Fitousis K, Bostan F, Masud F. Evaluation of the activated clotting time and activated partial thromboplastin time for the monitoring of heparin in adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Perfusion 2014; 29 (05) 456-461
  • 21 Wehner JE, Boehne M, David S, Brand K, Tiede A, Bikker R. Activated clotting time (ACT) for monitoring of low-dose heparin: performance characteristics in healthy adults and critically ill patients. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2020; 26: 1076029620975494
  • 22 Sy E, Sklar MC, Lequier L, Fan E, Kanji HD. Anticoagulation practices and the prevalence of major bleeding, thromboembolic events, and mortality in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care 2017; 39: 87-96
  • 23 Hwang NK, Rhee H, Kim IY. et al. Three cases of spontaneous lumbar artery rupture in hemodialysis patients. Hemodial Int 2017; 21 (01) E18-E21
  • 24 Yamamura H, Morioka T, Yamamoto T, Kaneda K, Mizobata Y. Spontaneous retroperitoneal bleeding: a case series. BMC Res Notes 2014; 7: 659
  • 25 Sugiura G, Bunya N, Yamaoka A. et al. Delayed retroperitoneal hemorrhage during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report. Acute Med Surg 2019; 6 (02) 180-184
  • 26 Mazzeffi MA, Tanaka K, Roberts A. et al. Bleeding, thrombosis, and transfusion with two heparin anticoagulation protocols in venoarterial ECMO patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33 (05) 1216-1220
  • 27 Kumar TKS, Zurakowski D, Dalton H. et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in postcardiotomy patients: factors influencing outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140 (02) 330-336.e2
  • 28 Martucci G, Panarello G, Occhipinti G. et al. Anticoagulation and transfusions management in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: assessment of factors associated with transfusion requirements and mortality. J Intensive Care Med 2019; 34 (08) 630-639