Rofo 2022; 194(08): 829-832
DOI: 10.1055/a-1825-9935
Editorial

Vision, Development, and Structure of the First German Specialist Training Curriculum for Radiology

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Isabel Molwitz*
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
Anne Frisch*
2   Department of Radiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
,
Gerhard Adam
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
Saif Afat*
3   Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Tübingen, Germany
,
Josefin Ammon*
4   Institute of Medical Physics, Nuremberg General Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
,
Gerald Antoch
5   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
,
Bettina Baeßler
6   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
,
Friederike Balks*
7   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
,
Jörg Barkhausen
7   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
,
Nadine Bayerl*
8   Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany
,
Andreas Brendlin*
3   Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Tübingen, Germany
,
Andreas Michael Bucher*
9   Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
,
Elena Dammann*
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
8   Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany
,
Anton Faron*
10   Radiologische Allianz, Hamburg
,
Mirjam Gerwing*
11   Clinic for Radiology, Westfaelische Wilhelms-University Muenster, Münster, Germany
,
Daniel Kaiser*
12   Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
,
Konstantin Nikolaou
3   Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Tübingen, Germany
,
Cansu Özden*
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
13   Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany
,
Christian Paulus
14   Administrative Office, German Roentgen Society, Berlin, Germany
,
Malte Sieren*
7   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
,
Corinna Storz*
15   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
,
Thomas Vollbrecht*
16   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
,
Franz Wegner*
7   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
,
Henrike-Renate Ziegler*
17   Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Germany
,
7   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
18   Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
,
Mitautoren aus Arbeitsgemeinschaften und Fachgesellschaften,
AG Forensisch-Radiologische Bildgebung, DRG
,
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Physik
,
AG Methodik und Forschung, DRG
,
AG Muskuloskelettale Radiologie, DRG
,
AG Ultraschall, DRG
,
AG Kopf-Hals-Radiologie, DRG
,
AG Thoraxdiagnostik, DRG; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Interventionelle Radiologie und minimal-invasive Therapie
,
AG Diagnostische Radiologie arbeits- und umweltbedingter Erkrankungen, DRG
,
AG Mammadiagnostik, DRG
,
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Interventionelle Radiologie und minimal-invasive Therapie
,
AG Gesundheitspolitische Verantwortung, DRG
,
AG Gastrointestinal- und Abdominaldiagnostik, DRG
,
Interdisziplinäre AG für Hybride Bildgebung, DRG und Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nuklearmedizin
,
AG Physik und Technik, DRG
,
AG Informationstechnologie, DRG
,
AG Thoraxdiagnostik, DRG
,
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neuroradiologie
,
AG Herz- und Gefäßdiagnostik
,
Vorstandskommission Lehre, DRG; Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Radiologie
,
AG Pädiatrische Radiologie, DRG
,
AG Onkologische Bildgebung, DRG
,
AG Diagnostische Radiologie arbeits- und umweltbedingter Erkrankungen, DRG
,
AG Uroradiologie und Urogenitaldiagnostik, DRG
,
Akademie für Fort- und Weiterbildung in der Radiologie, DRG
› Author Affiliations

According to the Model Specialist Training Regulations (MWBO) of the German Medical Association (Bundesärztekammer) “specialist training is undertaken in a structured form” [1]. In surveys conducted by the Young Radiology Forum of the German Roentgen Society in 2018 and 2020, physicians undergoing specialist training in radiology rated supervision with case discussion, a structured specialist training curriculum, and a fixed rotation schedule as the most helpful tools for successful specialist training [2] However, according to those surveyed, 63 % of all radiology training centers and 48 % of university hospitals did not have a structured training curriculum [2]. Even though a “structured program for specialist training [...] must be provided” (Model Specialist Training Regulations § 5 (6) [1]) when applying for specialist training authorization, physicians undergoing specialist training are apparently not sufficiently aware of these structured programs. Moreover, the scope and depth of existing local curricula vary which is a disadvantage with respect to ensuring a uniformly high training standard. To date, a national interdisciplinary curriculum that is supported by the professional societies has been realized by only a few disciplines in Germany. General medicine has had a national specialist training curriculum since 2015 [3], while cardiology’s national specialist training curriculum was introduced in 2013 [4] and updated in 2020. In particular, the general medicine curriculum has been used to increase not only the quality of specialist training as a result of the improved structure but also the popularity of specialist training in general medicine.

To improve the quality of specialist training in radiology and to support authorized specialist trainers and physicians undergoing specialist training, the Young Radiology Forum together with the working groups of the German Roentgen Society, the German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, the German Society for Neuroradiology, and the Society for Pediatric Radiology developed a national specialist training curriculum for radiology (https://www.forum-junge-radiologie.de/de-DE/4927/curriculum/).

* Specialist Training Task Force, Young Radiology Forum.




Publication History

Received: 07 July 2021

Accepted: 09 March 2022

Article published online:
29 July 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany