Z Orthop Unfall 2024; 162(01): 43-51
DOI: 10.1055/a-1838-5525
Leitlinie

S2k-Guideline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in the Neonate

Article in several languages: deutsch | English
Tamara Seidl
1   Vereinigung für Kinderorthopädie, Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Klinikum Herford, Herford, Deutschland (Ringgold ID: RIN14967)
,
Falk Thielemann
2   Vereinigung für Kinderorthopädie, UniversitätsCentrum für Orthopädie, Unfall- & Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
,
Anke Gerhardt
3   Berufsverband für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie e.V., Ortho-Zentrum Karlsruhe Orthopädische Gemeinschaftspraxis am Ludwigsplatz, Karlsruhe, Deutschland (Ringgold ID: RIN542934)
,
Hartmut Gaulrapp
4   Berufsverband für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie e.V., Facharztpraxis für Orthopädie und Kinderorthopädie München-Schwabing, München, Deutschland
,
Angelika Zierl
5   Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Radiologie e.V., Radiologisches Institut – Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland (Ringgold ID: RIN14881)
,
Silke Buchholz
6   Hüftdysplasie – Initiative, Hamburg, Deutschland
,
Antje Naumann
7   Hüftdysplasie – Initiative, Gotha, Deutschland
,
Bettina Winter
8   Hüftdysplasie – Initiative, Xanten, Deutschland
,
Klaus Rodens
9   Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin e.V., Bundesverband der Kinder- und Jugendärzte e.V., Kinderarztpraxis Klaus Rodens und Arnim Schaer, Langenau, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Hip developmental disorders are the most common musculoskeletal disease in newborns in Central Europe. The definition of hip developmental disorder includes both dysplastic and dislocated joints. In a dysplastic joint, shearing forces induce a growing disorder in the acetabulum. If this growing disorder persists, the femoral head first displaces the acetabular cartilage cranially and finally the femoral head dislocates posteriorly into the gluteal fossa – progressively losing contact to the acetabulum. Therefore nowadays there is general support for the concept of a developmental instead of a congenital dislocation of the hip. From the first day of life, the different stages of hip developmental disorder be exactly classified by an ultrasound examination of the infant hip joint according to Graf. Therefore the Graf hip ultrasound examination has been an integral part of the paediatric guidelines in Germany since 1996. All newborns must receive Graf hip ultrasound screening examination, ideally at the age of 4–5 (maximal 8) weeks as part of the U3 screening examination. Newborns with historical or clinical risk factors must receive an ultrasound examination in the first week of life, additionally to the clinical examination of the hip joints of all newborns according to the second screening examination U2. In the case of pathological results, therapy should be initiated according to measured hip type within one week. Dislocated joints need reduction and as soon as the contact between the femoral head and the acetabulum has been restored, the head should be retained securely within the acetabulum. This phase of retention is followed by the maturation phase for dislocated joints, which is also sufficient therapy for dysplastic joints. In order to avoid femoral head necrosis as an early complication or as a new hip developmental disorder in the course of further growth, the femoral head during the retention phase and the maturation phase should be placed deeply into the socket. This can be achieved by retaining hip flexion of 100–110° with simultaneous hip abduction of 50° to a maximum of 60°.



Publication History

Received: 17 February 2022

Accepted: 26 April 2022

Article published online:
26 July 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Ziegler J, Thielemann F, Mayer-Athenstaedt C. et al. Natürlicher Verlauf von Hüftreifungsstörungen und Hüftdysplasie. Eine Metaanalyse publizierter Literatur. Orthopäde 2008; 37: 515-524
  • 2 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. Hüftdysplasie – Teil Säulinge. Accessed December 22, 2021 at: https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/033-033.html
  • 3 Graf R, Hammer N, Matthiessen D. An integrated concept explaining for risk factors related to the onset of developmental dysplasia of the hip joint. Ann Orthop Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 4: 1029
  • 4 Altenhofen L, Hutzler D. Leitlinie für das hüftsonographische Screening im Rahmen des Programms „Krankheitsfrüherkennung im Kindesalter“. Dtsch Ärztebl 1996; 93: A-57
  • 5 [Anonym]. Vereinbarung von Qualitätssicherungsmaßnahmen nach §135 Abs. 2 SGB V zur Ultraschalldiagnostik (Ultraschall-Vereinbarung) vom 31.10.2008 in der ab dem 01.04.2021 geltenden Fassung. Accessed May 01, 2021 at: https://www.kbv.de/media/sp/Ultraschallvereinbarung.pdf
  • 6 Graf R. Warum ein Ausbildungskatalog für die Hüftsonographie?. Orthop Prax 2009; 45: 67-73
  • 7 Fröhlich S, Raddatz H, Mittelmeier W. State of the Art der Hüftsonographie bei Säuglingen. Orthopädie&Rheuma 2018; 21: 24-35
  • 8 Tschauner C, Klapsch W, Baumgartner A. et al. „Reifungskurve“ des sonographischen Alpha-Winkels nach Graf unbehandelter Hüftgelenke im ersten Lebensjahr. Z Orthop 1994; 132: 502-504
  • 9 De Pellegrin M, Bonifacini C. Einfluss des Alters in der Frühbehandlung einer schweren Hüftdysplasie auf die Pfannendachentwicklung. OUP 2016; 7/8: 408-412
  • 10 Hell AK, Becker JC, Rühmann O. et al. Inter- und intraindividuelle Messabweichungen in der Säuglingshüftsonografie nach Graf. Z Orthop Unfall 2008; 146: 624-629
  • 11 Eberhardt O, Zieger M, Wirth T, Fernandez FF. Der transinguinale Ultraschall zur Bestimmung der Hüftkopfzentrierung in der Behandlung der Hüftdysplasie und Hüftluxation. Z Orthop Unfall 2009; 147: 727-733
  • 12 Seidl T, Lohmaier J, Hölker T. et al. Die Tübinger Hüftbeugeschiene als Repositionsorthese?. Orthopäde 2012; 41: 195-199
  • 13 Kubo H, Pilge H, Weimann-Stahlschmidt K. et al. Use of the Tübingen splint for initial management of severely dysplastic and unstable hips in newborns with DDH: an alternative to Fettweis plaster and Pavlik harness. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2018; 138: 149-153 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2827-3. (PMID: 29080986)
  • 14 Atalar H, Gunay C, Komurcu M. Functional treatment of developmental hip dysplasia with the Tübingen hip flexion splint. Hip Int 2012; 24: 295-301
  • 15 Eberhardt O, Fernandez FF, Wirth T. Arthroscopic reduction of the dislocated hip in infants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94-B: 842-847
  • 16 Graf R, Roth-Schiffl E. Offene Reposition der so genannten kongenitalen Hüftluxation. Operat Orthop Traumatol 2001; 13: 43-53
  • 17 Engesaeter I, Lie SA, Lehmann TG. et al. Neonatal hip instability and risk of total hip replacement in young adulthood: follow-up of 2,218,596 newborns from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2008; 79: 321-326 DOI: 10.1080/17453670710015201. (PMID: 18622834)
  • 18 Engesaeter I, Lehmann T, Laborie LB. et al. Total hip replacement in young adults with hip dysplasia: Age at diagnosis, previous treatment, quality of life, and validation of diagnoses reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 1987 and 2007. Acta Orthop 2011; 82: 149-154 DOI: 10.1080/17453670710015201. (PMID: 18622834)
  • 19 Seidl T, Schnabel M. Gefährdet Pucken die Entwicklung der Säuglingshüfte?. Frauenarzt 2016; 57: 970-973
  • 20 Mulpuri K, Schaeffer EK, Andrade J. et al. What risk factors and characteristics are associated with late-presenting dislocations of the hip in infants?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474: 1131-1137 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4668-0. (PMID: 26728512)
  • 21 Studer K, Williams N, Antoniou G. et al. Increase in late diagnosed developmental dysplasia of the hip in South Australia: risk factors, proposed solutions. MJA 2016; 204: 240.e1-240.e6