Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2022; 38(04): 393-404
DOI: 10.1055/a-1854-2352
Original Article

Contemporary Management of Microtia

Anish Abrol
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
,
Randall Bly
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
,
Kathleen C. Y. Sie
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
,
Amit D. Bhrany
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Microtia techniques have evolved to improve esthetic outcomes, reduce donor site morbidities, and reduce complications. Patients with microtia commonly have aural atresia associated with conductive hearing loss. We present the evolution of our technique for microtia reconstruction and considerations for hearing management in these patients.

Keywords

microtia - aural atresia - autologous rib reconstruction - contemporary management


Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
17 May 2022

Article published online:
07 August 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Luquetti DV, Leoncini E, Mastroiacovo P. Microtia-anotia: a global review of prevalence rates. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2011; 91 (09) 813-822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Luquetti DV, Heike CL, Hing AV, Cunningham ML, Cox TC. Microtia: epidemiology and genetics. Am J Med Genet A 2012; 158A (01) 124-139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mastroiacovo P, Corchia C, Botto LD, Lanni R, Zampino G, Fusco D. Epidemiology and genetics of microtia-anotia: a registry based study on over one million births. J Med Genet 1995; 32 (06) 453-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Orioli IM, Castilla EE. Epidemiological assessment of misoprostol teratogenicity. BJOG 2000; 107 (04) 519-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Anderka MT, Lin AE, Abuelo DN, Mitchell AA, Rasmussen SA. Reviewing the evidence for mycophenolate mofetil as a new teratogen: case report and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A 2009; 149A (06) 1241-1248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Kaidarova Z, Harris JA. Epidemiologic characteristics of anotia and microtia in California, 1989-1997. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2004; 70 (07) 472-475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Harris J, Källén B, Robert E. The epidemiology of anotia and microtia. J Med Genet 1996; 33 (10) 809-813
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Castilla EE, Orioli IM. Prevalence rates of microtia in South America. Int J Epidemiol 1986; 15 (03) 364-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 van Nunen DP, Kolodzynski MN, van den Boogaard MJ, Kon M, Breugem CC. Microtia in the Netherlands: clinical characteristics and associated anomalies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78 (06) 954-959
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bly RA, Bhrany AD, Murakami CS, Sie KC. Microtia reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24 (04) 577-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Li D, Chin W, Wu J. et al. Psychosocial outcomes among microtia patients of different ages and genders before ear reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 34 (05) 570-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Brent B. Ear reconstruction with an expansile framework of autogenous rib cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 53 (06) 619-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nagata S. Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle: part I. Grafting the three-dimensional costal cartilage framework for lobule-type microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (02) 221-230 , discussion 267–268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nagata S. Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle: part II. Grafting the three-dimensional costal cartilage framework for concha-type microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (02) 231-242 , discussion 267–268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nagata S. Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle: part III. Grafting the three-dimensional costal cartilage framework for small concha-type microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (02) 243-253 , discussion 267–268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Patel SA, Bhrany AD, Murakami CS, Sie KC. Autologous costochondral microtia reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (02) 188-198
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pluijmers BI, Caron CJ, Dunaway DJ, Wolvius EB, Koudstaal MJ. Mandibular reconstruction in the growing patient with unilateral craniofacial microsomia: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 43 (03) 286-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Chen ZC, Chen PK, Hung KF, Lo LJ, Chen YR. Microtia reconstruction with adjuvant 3-dimensional template model. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53 (03) 282-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Chen HY, Ng LS, Chang CS, Lu TC, Chen NH, Chen ZC. Pursuing mirror image reconstruction in unilateral microtia: customizing auricular framework by application of three-dimensional imaging and three-dimensional printing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (06) 1433-1443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kimura K, Davis S, Thomas E. et al. 3D customization for microtia repair in hemifacial microsomia. Laryngoscope 2022; 132 (03) 545-549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Berens AM, Newman S, Bhrany AD, Murakami C, Sie KC, Zopf DA. Computer-aided design and 3d printing to produce a costal cartilage model for simulation of auricular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 155 (02) 356-359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Chang B, Powell A, Ellsperman S. et al. Multicenter advanced pediatric otolaryngology fellowship prep surgical simulation course with 3D printed high-fidelity models. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 162 (05) 658-665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Otto IA, Capendale PE, Garcia JP. et al. Biofabrication of a shape-stable auricular structure for the reconstruction of ear deformities. Mater Today Bio 2021; 9: 100094
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Posniak S, Chung JHY, Liu X. et al. Bioprinting of chondrocyte stem cell co-cultures for auricular cartilage regeneration. ACS Omega 2022; 7 (07) 5908-5920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bhamare N, Tardalkar K, Khadilkar A, Parulekar P, Joshi MG. Tissue engineering of human ear pinna. Cell Tissue Bank 2022; (e-pub ahead of print) DOI: 10.1007/s10561-022-09991-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Suutarla S, Rautio J, Ritvanen A, Ala-Mello S, Jero J, Klockars T. Microtia in Finland: comparison of characteristics in different populations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 71 (08) 1211-1217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ikeda AK, Bhrany AD, Sie KCY, Bly RA. Management of patients with unilateral microtia and aural atresia: recent advances and updates. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 29 (06) 526-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ruhl DS, Kesser BW. Atresiaplasty in congenital aural atresia: what the facial plastic surgeon needs to know. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2018; 26 (01) 87-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Roberson Jr. JB, Reinisch J, Colen TY, Lewin S. Atresia repair before microtia reconstruction: comparison of early with standard surgical timing. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30 (06) 771-776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Yellon RF. Combined atresiaplasty and tragal reconstruction for microtia and congenital aural atresia: thesis for the American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (02) 245-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar