Teenage Pregnancies in Austria – an Epidemiological Study on Prevalence and Perinatal Outcome

Abstract

Introduction Even though teenage pregnancy rates have been declining in the last decades, their global prevalence is still high and shows country-specific discrepancies. Insufficient sexual education, poor availability of contraceptives and early marriage are some of the multifactorial causes for adolescent pregnancies. Very often teenage pregnancies are classified as high-risk pregnancies. Studies have found higher rates of peripartal complications, such as preterm birth, low birth weight or low fetal Apgar-Scores. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the prevalence of teenage pregnancies in Austria and to identify principal differences in maternal and neonatal outcome.

Material and methods Data were collected from the Austrian Birth Registry between 01/2012 and 12/2020. A total of 751661 deliveries in Austria were documented. Obstetric, maternal and neonatal parameters were descriptively analyzed. Mothers were subclassified into two age groups: teenage mothers of 19 years and younger and adult mothers of 20 to 39 years of age.

Results Newborns of teenage mothers were significantly smaller (49.98 ± 3.11 vs. 50.31 ± 3.16 cm, p < 0.001) and had a lower birth weight (3216 ± 564 vs. 3247 ± 576 g, p < 0.001) than newborns of adult mothers. The percentage of caesarean deliveries in the teenage group was significantly lower than in adult mothers (21.1 vs. 31.8%, p < 0.001). Newborns of teenage mothers had significantly higher rates of very low (< 4) and low (< 7) 5-minute Apgar scores (5-minute Apgar < 4: 0.75 vs. 0.54%, p = 0.004) (5-minute Apgar < 7: 1.77 vs. 1.37%, p = 0.001) and significantly lower arterial umbilical-cord pH (7.25 ± 0.08 vs. 7.26 ± 0.08, p < 0.001). Perinatal mortality was higher in the age group below 20 years (0.7 vs. 0.6%, p = 0.043).

Conclusion The data of this study show significantly poorer outcomes in pregnancies of teenagers compared to adult women, even though the healthcare system in Austria is considered excellent. Future guideline recommendations should focus on important aspects of obstetric care in teenage mothers.

Keywords

teenage pregnancies - adolescence - pregnancy outcome - Austria - risk factors

Publication History

Received: 24 March 2022

Accepted after revision: 26 July 2022

Article published online:
25 October 2022

• References/Literatur

• 1 Chandra-Mouli V, Camacho AV, Michaud PA. WHO Guidelines on Preventing Early Pregnancy and Poor Reproductive Outcomes Among Adolescents in Developing Countries. J Adolesc Health 2013; 52: 517-522 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.03.002. (PMID: 23608717)
• 2 Fleming N, O’Driscoll T, Becker G. et al. Adolescent Pregnancy Guidelines. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2015; 37: 740-756 DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30180-8. (PMID: 26474231)
• 3 WHO. Adolescent health. 2022 Accessed April 05, 2022 at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescent-health
• 4 Sedgh G, Finer LB, Bankole A. et al. Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates across countries: levels and recent trends. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med 2015; 56: 223-230 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.007. (PMID: 25620306)
• 5 Euro-Peristat Project. European Perinatal Health Report. Core indicators of the health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2015. 2018 Accessed September 16, 2022 at: https://www.europeristat.com/images/EPHR2015_web_hyperlinked_Euro-Peristat.pdf
• 6 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Demographic Yearbook 70th Issue – 2019. Accessed February 20, 2022 at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic-social/products/dyb/dyb_2019/
• 7 Part K, Moreau C, Donati S. et al. Teenage pregnancies in the European Union in the context of legislation and youth sexual and reproductive health services. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92: 1395-1406 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12253. (PMID: 24004102)
• 8 Statistik Austria. Lebendgeborene seit 2005 nach Altersgruppen der Mutter und Bundesland. 15.02.2022 Accessed February 23, 2022 at: https://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/bevoelkerung/geborene/index.html
• 9 Vargas G, Borus J, Charlton BM. Teenage pregnancy prevention: the role of young men. Curr Opin Pediatr 2017; 29: 393-398 DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000510. (PMID: 28538285)
• 10 Catic A. Teenagerschwangerschaften – ein weltweiter Überblick und die Situation in Österreich. J Gynäkol Endokrinol AT 2021; 31: 109-111 DOI: 10.1007/s41974-021-00197-5.
• 11 Gigante D, de França G, De Lucia Rolfe E. et al. Adolescent parenthood associated with adverse socio-economic outcomes at age 30 years in women and men of the Pelotas, Brazil: 1982 Birth Cohort Study. BJOG 2019; 126: 360-367 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15428. (PMID: 30099837)
• 12 Azevedo WF, Diniz MB, Fonseca ES. et al. Complications in adolescent pregnancy: systematic review of the literature. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2015; 13: 618-626 DOI: 10.1590/S1679-45082015RW3127. (PMID: 26061075)
• 13 Wong SPW, Twynstra J, Gilliland JA. et al. Risk Factors and Birth Outcomes Associated with Teenage Pregnancy: A Canadian Sample. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2020; 33: 153-159 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.10.006. (PMID: 31634579)
• 14 Pergialiotis V, Vlachos D-EG, Gkioka E. et al. Teenage pregnancy antenatal and perinatal morbidity: Results from a tertiary centre in Greece. J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 35: 595-599 DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2014.991285.
• 15 Chen XK, Wen SW, Fleming N. et al. Teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a large population based retrospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2007; 36: 368-373 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyl284. (PMID: 17213208)
• 16 Marino J, Lewis L, Hickey M. et al. Teenage mothers. Aust J Gen Pract 2016; 45: 712-717 (PMID: 27695719)
• 17 Berger R, Abele H, Bahlmann F. et al. Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/025, February 2019) – Part 1 with Recommendations on the Epidemiology, Etiology, Prediction, Primary and Secondary Prevention of Preterm Birth. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79: 800-812 DOI: 10.1055/a-0903-2671. (PMID: 31423016)
• 18 Usta IM, Zoorob D, Abu-Musa A. et al. Obstetric outcome of teenage pregnancies compared with adult pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87: 178-183 DOI: 10.1080/00016340701803282. (PMID: 18231885)
• 19 Geburtenregister Österreich (GRÖ). Datensicherheit und Datenschutz. 2022 Accessed May 18, 2022 at: https://www.iet.at/page.cfm?vpath=register/geburtenregister#Datensicherheit/Datenschutz
• 20 Statistik Austria. Aktueller Raucherstatus 2019. 09.12.2020 Accessed March 13, 2022 at: https://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/gesundheit/gesundheitsdeterminanten/rauchen/index.html
• 21 Kc K, Shakya S, Zhang H. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Macrosomia: A Literature Review. Ann Nutr Metab 2015; 66 (Suppl. 02) 14-20 DOI: 10.1159/000371628. (PMID: 26045324)
• 22 Schäfer-Graf UM, Gembruch U, Kainer F. et al. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) - Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up. Guideline of the DDG and DGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry Number 057/008, February 2018). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78: 1219-1231 DOI: 10.1055/a-0659-2596. (PMID: 30651660)
• 23 Jackson MA, Brown AL, Baker AL. et al. The Incentives to Quit tobacco in Pregnancy (IQuiP) protocol: piloting a financial incentive-based smoking treatment for women attending substance use in pregnancy antenatal services. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e032330 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032330. (PMID: 31753890)
• 24 Peterson LA, Hecht SS. Tobacco, e-cigarettes, and child health. Curr Opin Pediatr 2017; 29: 225-230 DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000456. (PMID: 28059903)
• 25 Almeida NKO, Pedreira CE, Almeida RMVR. Impact of maternal education level on risk of low Apgar score. Public Health 2016; 140: 244-249 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.04.009. (PMID: 27216579)
• 26 Karataşlı V, Kanmaz AG, İnan AH. et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of adolescent pregnancy. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2019; 48: 347-350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.02.011. (PMID: 30794955)
• 27 Wong Shee A, Frawley N, Robertson C. et al. Accessing and engaging with antenatal care: an interview study of teenage women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21: 693-693 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04137-1. (PMID: 34629069)
• 28 Committee Opinion No 700: Methods for Estimating the Due Date. Obstet Gynecol [Anonym]. 2017; 129: e150-e154 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002046.
• 29 Rysavy MA, Horbar JD, Bell EF. et al. Assessment of an Updated Neonatal Research Network Extremely Preterm Birth Outcome Model in the Vermont Oxford Network. JAMA Pediatr 2020; 174: e196294 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6294. (PMID: 32119065)
• 30 National Institutes of Health (NIH). Extremely Preterm Birth Outcomes Tool. 03.02.2020 Accessed May 20, 2022 at: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/EPBO
• 31 Schildberger B, Linzner D, Hehenberger L. et al. Influence of Maternal Age on Selected Obstetric Parameters. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79: 1208-1215 DOI: 10.1055/a-0859-0826. (PMID: 31736510)
• 32 Katz Eriksen JL, Melamed A, Clapp MA. et al. Cesarean Delivery in Adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2016; 29: 443-447 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.01.123. (PMID: 26836505)
• 33 Kahveci B, Melekoglu R, Evruke IC. et al. The effect of advanced maternal age on perinatal outcomes in nulliparous singleton pregnancies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18: 343-343 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1984-x. (PMID: 30134873)
• 34 Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G. et al. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (02) CD000081 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3. (PMID: 28176333)