Change of Clinical and Radiologic Parameters after Minimally Invasive Decompression in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Study with Long-term Follow-up

Abstract

Background The impact of minimally invasive decompression (MID) techniques on spinopelvic parameters and on the sagittal alignment remains a controversial topic. Here we studied the changes in clinical and radiologic parameters and their relationships in a series of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) submitted to MID with a minimum follow-up (FU) of 24 months.

Methods We prospectively collected clinical and radiologic data of 20 consecutive patients who were evaluated preoperatively, at the 6-month FU, and at the 24-month FU. Visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), neck disability index (NDI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C7 slope (C7S), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were assessed for each patient. Moreover, the percentage variation of clinical and radiologic factors at the 24-month FU compared with the preoperative factors was calculated to perform correlation studies among these variables.

Results We reported a significant improvement of all clinical parameters. A significant increase of LL and SS and a significant decrease of PT and SVA were observed. The preoperative values of ODI, LL, SS, PT, and SVA significantly affect the 24-month FU values, and the percentage improvement of SVA at the 24-month FU compared with the preoperative values was significantly related to the percentage improvement of LL.

Conclusions MID is clinically effective in patients with LSS and improves the spinopelvic parameters and the global sagittal balance of the spine. The preoperative spinal alignment affects the spinal alignment at FU. The improvement of SVA was strictly related to the improvement of LL.

Keywords

sagittal balance - minimally invasive decompression - lumbar spinal stenosis - spine surgery

Publication History

Received: 21 March 2022

Accepted: 21 July 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 July 2022

Article published online:
05 December 2022

• References

• 1 Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P. Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 2007; 16 (09) 1459-1467
• 2 Battié MC, Videman T, Parent E. Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences. Spine 2004; 29 (23) 2679-2690
• 3 Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec JC. Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms?. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 (Suppl. 05) 626-633
• 4 Le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A. Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 2019; 28 (09) 1889-1905
• 5 Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD. et al; SPORT Investigators. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (08) 794-810
• 6 Ricciardi L, Stifano V, Sturiale CL, D'Onofrio GF, Olivi A, Montano N. Minimally invasive decompression with posterior elements preservation versus laminectomy and fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical, clinical and radiological outcomes. Surg Technol Int 2020; 36: 457-463
• 7 Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L. et al; European Spine Study Group (ESSG). Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (19) 1661-1672
• 8 Shin EK, Kim CH, Chung CK. et al. Sagittal imbalance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and outcomes after simple decompression surgery. Spine J 2017; 17 (02) 175-182
• 9 Ogura Y, Shinozaki Y, Kobayashi Y. et al. Impact of decompression surgery without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis on sagittal spinopelvic alignment: minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 30 (06) 1-7
• 10 Ogura Y, Shinozaki Y, Kobayashi Y. et al. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life after decompression surgery without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 30 (04) 1-6
• 11 Dohzono S, Toyoda H, Matsumoto T, Suzuki A, Terai H, Nakamura H. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2015; 23 (01) 49-54
• 12 Fujii K, Kawamura N, Ikegami M, Niitsuma G, Kunogi J. Radiological improvements in global sagittal alignment after lumbar decompression without fusion. Spine 2015; 40 (10) 703-709
• 13 Hikata T, Watanabe K, Fujita N. et al. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance. J Neurosurg Spine 2015; 23 (04) 451-458
• 14 Jeon CH, Lee HD, Lee YS, Seo HS, Chung NS. Change in sagittal profiles after decompressive laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a 2-year preliminary report. Spine 2015; 40 (05) E279-E285
• 15 Chang HS. Effect of sagittal spinal balance on the outcome of decompression surgery for lumbar canal stenosis. World Neurosurg 2018; 119: e200-e208
• 16 Madkouri R, Brauge D, Vidon-Buthion A. et al. Improvement in sagittal balance after decompression surgery without fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis: clinical and radiographic results at 1 year. World Neurosurg 2018; 114: e417-e424
• 17 Costa MA, Silva PS, Vaz R, Pereira P. Correlation between clinical outcomes and spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar stenosis undergoing decompression surgery. Eur Spine J 2021; 30 (04) 928-935
• 18 Montano N, Stifano V, Papacci F, Mazzucchi E, Fernandez E. Minimally invasive decompression in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Report of a surgical series and review of the literature. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2018; 52 (04) 448-458
• 19 Ames CP, Smith JS, Scheer JK. et al. Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults: a review. J Neurosurg Spine 2012; 16 (06) 547-564
• 20 Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine 2009; 34 (17) E599-E606
• 21 Diebo BG, Ferrero E, Lafage R. et al. Recruitment of compensatory mechanisms in sagittal spinal malalignment is age and regional deformity dependent: a full-standing axis analysis of key radiographical parameters. Spine 2015; 40 (09) 642-649
• 22 Suzuki H, Endo K, Kobayashi H, Tanaka H, Yamamoto K. Total sagittal spinal alignment in patients with lumbar canal stenosis accompanied by intermittent claudication. Spine 2010; 35 (09) E344-E346
• 23 Mehta S, Szklaruk J, Faria SC, Raymond AK, Whitman GJ. Radiologic-pathologic conferences of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: Chondromyxoid fibroma of the sacrum and left iliac bone. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186 (02) 467-469
• 24 Farrokhi MR, Haghnegahdar A, Rezaee H, Sharifi Rad MR. Spinal sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; a comparative study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016; 151: 136-141
• 25 Ling FP, Chevillotte T, Leglise A, Thompson W, Bouthors C, Le Huec JC. Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review. Eur Spine J 2018; 27 (Suppl. 01) 8-15