“Floating Hip”: Epidemiology and Quality of Care

Abstract

Introduction The “floating hip” is a rare and complex fracture involving the pelvis and the ipsilateral femur and is therefore difficult to treat. Data and studies on this topic are still scarce. The optimal strategy for surgical treatment and thus the resulting quality of treatment are still being debated; a femur-first strategy is often the preferred treatment. Methods Retrospectively, patients with a pelvic fracture treated at the Level I Trauma Centre of the University of Tübingen between 2003 and 2017 were identified. Patients with an additional ipsilateral femur fracture were identified in this collective. We compared the quality of treatment of pelvic fractures between floating and non-floating hip injuries. Results Proximal femur fractures were more common with pelvic ring fractures (n = 16) than with acetabular fractures (n = 1). Floating hip injuries occur more frequently in younger polytraumatised male patients. Pelvic fractures in floating hip injuries are operated more frequently (62.8% vs. 39.1%; p = 0.003) and the clinical course is significantly longer (27.8 ± 19.3 vs. 19.9 ± 23.1 days; p < 0.001). However, the quality of treatment of pelvic fracture, exemplified by morbidity (18.6% vs. 14.6%; p = 0.610) and mortality (7.0% vs. 2.6%; p = 0.108), shows no differences. Conclusion Injury severity and complexity of pelvic fracture is significantly higher in floating hip injuries, but without affecting the resulting quality of treatment. A “femur first” treatment strategy is preferable. Algorithms for emergency treatment and definitive care are proposed in a flowchart.

Keywords

“floating hip” - acetabular fracture - pelvic ring fracture - femur fracture - femur first treatment strategy

Publication History

Received: 25 April 2022

Accepted after revision: 01 August 2022

Article published online:
04 October 2022

• References

• 1 Mohamed SO, Ju W, Qin Y. et al. The term “floating” used in traumatic orthopedics. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98: e14497
• 2 Suzuki T, Shindo M, Soma K. The floating hip injury: which should we fix first?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2006; 16: 214-218
• 3 Liebergall M, Lowe J, Whitelaw GP. et al. The floating hip. Ipsilateral pelvic and femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74: 93-100
• 4 Wu CC, Shih CH, Chen LH. Femoral shaft fractures complicated by fracture-dislocations of the ipsilateral hip. J Trauma 1993; 34: 70-75
• 5 Liebergall M, Mosheiff R, Safran O. et al. The floating hip injury: patterns of injury. Injury 2002; 33: 717-722
• 6 Müller EJ, Siebenrock K, Ekkernkamp A. et al. Ipsilateral fractures of the pelvis and the femur -- floating hip?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999; 119: 179-182
• 7 Brainard BJ, Slauterbeck J, Benjamin JB. Fracture Patterns and Mechanisms in Pedestrian Motor-Vehicle Trauma. J Orthop Trauma 1992; 6: 279-282
• 8 Wu CL, Tseng IC, Huang JW. et al. Unstable Pelvic Fractures Associated with Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis. Biomed J 2013; 36: 77-83
• 9 Kregor PJ, Templeman D. Associated Injuries Complicating the Management of Acetabular Fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2002; 33: 73-95
• 10 Burd TA, Hughes MS, Anglen JO. The Floating Hip: Complications and Outcomes. J Trauma 2008; 64: 442-448
• 11 Sen RK, Jha L. Floating hip. J Clin Orthop 2017; 2: 43-48
• 12 Kuss O, Blettner M, Börgermann J. Propensity Score: an Alternative Method of Analyzing Treatment Effects. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2016; 113: 597-603
• 13 Team R. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R; v. 1.2.5001. Boston, MA, USA: RStudio, Inc.; 2019
• 14 Newgard CD, Fleischman R, Choo E. et al. Validation of Length of Hospital Stay as a Surrogate Measure for Injury Severity and Resource Use Among Injury Survivors. Acad Emerg Med 2010; 17: 142-150
• 15 Coccolini F, Stahel PF, Montori G. et al. Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 2017; 12: 5
• 16 AO Surgery Reference. Buckley R, Baumgaertner M, Lambert S. 2. Accessed April 01, 2022 at: https://surgeryreference.aofoundation.org/