Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-1929-2629
Breast Cancer and Genetic BRCA1/2 Testing in Routine Clinical Practice: Why, When and For Whom?
Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Abstract
Pathogenic variants of the tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are responsible for the majority of hereditary breast cancers; they are also becoming increasingly important to identify whether patients are suitable for targeted therapy with poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi).
Patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and BRCA1/2 germline mutations can benefit significantly from PARPi therapy, and the findings of the OlympiAD and the EMBRACA phase III clinical trials for regulatory approval were recently expanded by the addition of the most recent OlympiA data on the treatment of patients with early disease and a high risk of recurrence.
This means that BRCA1/2 germline testing to plan patient therapy is now also relevant for patients with early breast cancer and therefore has a direct impact on survival. Healthcare research data shows, however, that BRCA1/2 testing rates are strongly affected by familial history, cancer subtype (particularly triple-negative subtypes), and patient age at onset of disease (especially with regards to younger patients with breast cancer), despite the existing clear recommendations for BRCA1/2 germline testing to identify whether PARPi therapy is indicated.
This article presents the clinical implications of identifying BRCA1/2 germline mutations in patients with breast cancer, the current recommendations on molecular diagnostics, and their implementation in practice. The treatment of patients with breast cancer has progressed greatly in recent years and now offers individual treatment concepts which can only be implemented after the targeted identification of individual parameters.
As detection of a BRCA1/2 germline mutation is essential for planning individual therapy, where indicated, testing should be arranged as early as possible. It is the only way of identifying patients suitable for PARPi therapy and ensuring they receive the best possible treatment. This also applies to patients with a negative familial history, HR-positive disease, or who are older at onset of disease.
Keywords
breast cancer - BRCA1/2 diagnostics - therapy planning - PARP inhibitors - talazoparib - olaparibPublication History
Received: 02 December 2022
Accepted: 06 December 2022
Article published online:
09 March 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References/Literatur
- 1 Kommission Mamma der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO). Guidelines Breast Version 2022.1D. Breast Cancer Risk and Prevention. Accessed April 13, 2022 at: https://www.ago-online.de/leitlinien-empfehlungen/leitlinien-empfehlungen/kommission-mamma
- 2 Kommission Mamma der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO). Guidelines Breast Version 2022.1D. Prognostic and Predictive Factors. Accessed April 13, 2022 at: https://www.ago-online.de/leitlinien-empfehlungen/leitlinien-empfehlungen/kommission-mamma
- 3 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Breast cancer, version 3.2022. Accessed May 07, 2022 at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf
- 4 AstraZeneca. Fachinformation Lynparza 100 mg/150 mg Filmtabletten. 2022 Accessed December 16, 2022 at: https://www.fachinfo.de/pdf/021996
- 5 Pfizer. Fachinformation Talzenna. 2021 Accessed December 16, 2022 at: https://figi.pfizer.de/sites/default/files/FI-22631.pdf
- 6 Robert Koch-Institut. Krebs in Deutschland für 2017/2018. 13. Ausgabe. Berlin: Robert-Koch-Institut; 2021. Accessed December 16, 2022 at: https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Publikationen/Krebs_in_Deutschland/kid_2021/krebs_in_deutschland_2021.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
- 7 National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts: Female Breast Cancer. Accessed December 16, 2022 at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html
- 8 Hu C, Hart SN, Gnanaolivu R. et al. A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 440-451
- 9 Dorling L, Carvalho S, Allen J. Breast Cancer Association Consortium. et al. Breast Cancer Risk Genes – Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 428-439
- 10 Couch F, Hu C, Hart S. et al. Age-related breast cancer risk estimates for the general population based on sequencing of cancer predisposition genes in 19,228 breast cancer patients and 20,211 matched unaffected controls from US based cohorts in the CARRIERS study. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4–8; San Antonio, TX Philadelphia (PA): AACR. Cancer Res 2019; 79 (Suppl. 04) GS2–01
- 11 Fasching PA, Yadav S, Hu C. et al. Mutations in BRCA1/2 and Other Panel Genes in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer -Association With Patient and Disease Characteristics and Effect on Prognosis. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39: 1619-1630
- 12 O’Shaughnessy J, Brezden-Masley C, Cazzaniga M. et al. Prevalence of germline BRCA mutations in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: global results from the real-world, observational BREAKOUT study. Breast cancer research 2020; 22: 114
- 13 Kurian AW, Ward KC, Howlader N. et al. Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37: 1305-1315
- 14 Mavaddat N, Dorling L, Carvalho S. Breast Cancer Association Consortium. et al. Pathology of Tumors Associated With Pathogenic Germline Variants in 9 Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8: e216744
- 15 Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ. et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 2005; 434: 917-921
- 16 Tutt AN, Lord CJ, McCabe N. et al. Exploiting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells in the design of new therapeutic strategies for cancer. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2005; 70: 139-148
- 17 Kommission Mamma der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO). Guidelines Breast Version 2022.2D. Adjuvant Cytotoxic and Targeted Therapy. Accessed November 11, 2022 at: https://www.ago-online.de/leitlinien-empfehlungen/leitlinien-empfehlungen/kommission-mamma
- 18 Wunderle M, Gass P, Häberle L. et al. BRCA mutations and their influence on pathological complete response and prognosis in a clinical cohort of neoadjuvantly treated breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 171: 85-94
- 19 Hahnen E, Lederer B, Hauke J. et al. Germline Mutation Status, Pathological Complete Response, and Disease-Free Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the GeparSixto Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3: 1378-1385
- 20 Fasching PA, Loibl S, Hu C. et al. BRCA1/2 Mutations and Bevacizumab in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer: Response and Prognosis Results in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From the GeparQuinto Study. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: 2281-2287
- 21 Tutt A, Tovey H, Cheang MCU. et al. Carboplatin in BRCA1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: the TNT Trial. Nat Med 2018; 24: 628-637
- 22 Geyer CE, Sikov WM, Huober J. et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of addition of carboplatin with or without veliparib to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: 4-year follow-up data from BrighTNess, a randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol 2022; 33: 384-394
- 23 Kommission Mamma der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO). Guidelines Breast Version 2022.1D. Neoadjuvant (Primary) Systemic Therapy. Accessed April 13, 2022 at: https://www.ago-online.de/leitlinien-empfehlungen/leitlinien-empfehlungen/kommission-mamma
- 24 Rider A, Quek RGW, Lewis K. et al. Impact of BRCA1/2 mutations status on patient reported outcomes in HER2- advanced breast cancer: Results from a multi-country real-world study. Ann Oncol 2019; 30 (Suppl. 03) iii54-iii55
- 25 Lux MP, Lewis K, Rider A. et al. BRCA1/2 status, treatment patterns, and safety outcomes in HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC): Results from the European component of a multi-country real-world study. In, Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10–14; San Antonio. TX Philadelphia (PA): AACR. Cancer Res 2020; 80 (Suppl. 04) P2–15–02
- 26 Lux MP, Lewis K, Rider A. et al. Treatment Patterns, Safety, and Patient-Reported Outcomes among Adult Women with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer with or without, or with Unknown BRCA1/2 Mutation(s): Results of a Real-World Study from the United States, United Kingdom, and Four EU Countries. Breast Care 2022; 17: 460-469
- 27 Clovis Oncology. Rote-Hand-Brief zu Rucaparib (Rubraca®). Einschränkung der Indikation. München: Clovis Oncology; Accessed August 08, 2022 at: https://www.bfarm.de/SharedDocs/Risikoinformationen/Pharmakovigilanz/DE/RHB/2022/rhb-rubraca2.pdf
- 28 Robson M, Im SA, Senkus E. et al. Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients with a Germline BRCA Mutation. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 523-533
- 29 Litton JK, Rugo HS, Ettl J. et al. Talazoparib in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer and a Germline BRCA Mutation. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 753-763
- 30 Tung NM, Im SA, Senkus-Konefka E. et al. Olaparib versus chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (OlympiAD): Efficacy in patients with visceral metastases. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: 1052
- 31 Robson ME, Tung N, Conte P. et al. OlympiAD final overall survival and tolerability results: Olaparib versus chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2019; 30: 558-566
- 32 Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Kaufman B. et al. Adjuvant Olaparib for Patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2-Mutated Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 2394-2405
- 33 Tutt A, Garber JE, Gelber RD. et al. Prespecified event-driven analysis of overall survival in the OlympiA phase III trial of adjuvant olaparib in germline BRCA1/2 mutation associated breast cancer. ESMO Virtual Plenary Abstract VP1–2022 Presented March 16, 2022. 2022 Accessed December 16, 2022 at: https://oncologypro.esmo.org/meeting-resources/esmo-virtual-plenary-resources/olympia-phase-iii-pre-specified-event-driven-analysis-of-overall-survival-of-olaparib-in-gbrcam-breast-cancer
- 34 Geyer CE jr., Garber JE, Gelber RD. et al. Overall survival in the OlympiA phase III trial of adjuvant olaparib in patients with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and high-risk, early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2022; 33: P1250-P1268
- 35 Tutt A, Garber JE, Kaufman B. et al. OlympiA: A phase III, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adjuvant olaparib after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and high-risk HER2-negative early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39 (Suppl. 18) LBA1
- 36 Robson M, Ruddy KJ, Im SA. et al. Patient-reported outcomes in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer receiving olaparib versus chemotherapy in the OlympiAD trial. Eur J Cancer 2019; 120: 20-30
- 37 Ettl J, Quek RGW, Lee KH. et al. Quality of life with talazoparib versus physician’s choice of chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutation: patient-reported outcomes from the EMBRACA phase III trial. Ann Oncol 2018; 29: 1939-1947
- 38 Cella D, Lai JS, Chang CH. et al. Fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population. Cancer 2002; 94: 528-538
- 39 Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J. et al. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 139-144
- 40 Ganz PA, Bandos H, Spanic T. et al. Quality of life results from OlympiA: A phase III, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adjuvant olaparib after (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and high-risk HER-2 negative early breast cancer. In, Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7–10; San Antonio. TX Philadelphia (PA): AACR. Cancer Res 2022; 82 (Suppl. 04) GS4–09
- 41 Balmana J, Fasching PA, Delaloge S. et al. 174P Clinical effectiveness and safety of olaparib in BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting: Phase IIIb LUCY final analysis. Ann Oncol 2022; 33: S205-S206
- 42 Loirat D, de Labarre MD, Essner C. et al. Phase IV study evaluating effectiveness and safety of talazoparib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer and a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (ViTAL). In, Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7–10. San Antonio, TX Philadelphia (PA): AACR. Cancer Res 2022; 82 (Suppl. 04) P1–18–28
- 43 OnkoZert. Checkliste Erfassung erbliche Belastung. Accessed January 18, 2022 at: https://www.onkozert.de/informationen-zertifizierung/hinweise-downloads/genetische-beratung-familiaeres-mammakarzinom/
- 44 Kommission Mamma der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO). Guidelines Breast Version 2022.1D. Therapy algorithms. Accessed April 13, 2022 at: https://www.ago-online.de/leitlinien-empfehlungen/leitlinien-empfehlungen/kommission-mamma
- 45 Gennari A, Andre F, Barrios CH. et al. ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2021; 32: 1475-1495
- 46 Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S. et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2019; 30: 1674
- 47 Gesetz über genetische Untersuchungen bei Menschen (Gendiagnostikgesetz –GenDG) vom 31. Juli 2009 (BGBl. I S. 2529, 3672), das zuletzt durch Artikel 15 Absatz 4 des Gesetzes vom 4. Mai 2021 (BGBl. I S. 882) geändert worden ist. Accessed January 18, 2022 at: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gendg/BJNR252900009.html
- 48 Lux MP, Decker T, Runkel ED. et al. Awareness and Availability of Routine Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation Testing in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer in Germany. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17: 40-46
- 49 Eccles DM, Mitchell G, Monteiro AN. et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 2057-2065
- 50 Lux MP, Lewis K, Rider A. et al. Real-world multi-country study of BRCA1/2 mutation testing among adult women with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Future Oncol 2022; 18: 1089-1101
- 51 Mahtani R, Niyazov A, Lewis K. et al. Real-world (RW) multi-country study of BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCA1/2mut) testing trends among adult patients (pts) with HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC). Ann Oncol 2020; 31 (Suppl. 04) S348-S395
- 52 Roa BB, Boyd AA, Volcik K. et al. Ashkenazi Jewish population frequencies for common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Nat Genet 1996; 14: 185-187
- 53 Mahtani R, Niyazov A, Lewis K. et al. Germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) testing patterns among oncologists (ONC) treating HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC): Results from a multi-country real-world study. Ann Oncol 2020; 31 (Suppl. 02) S72-S73