Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Selected Subgroups of Men: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

Abstract

Background Although men are considered at high risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), sex-specific data on prognostic factors are lacking. We estimated the cumulative recurrence risks associated with clinical characteristics and comorbidities known or suspected to be associated with the development of VTE recurrence: major surgery, trauma, history of cancer, rheumatic disorder, ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, chronic renal disease, varicose veins, alcohol-related diseases, and arterial hypertension.

Methods We linked nationwide Danish health registries to identify all incident VTE in- and outpatients in men from 2008 through 2018. Recurrent VTE risk 2 years after anticoagulant discontinuation was calculated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, stratified by age above/below 50 years.

Results The study included 13,932 men with VTE, of whom 21% (n = 2,898) were aged <50 years. For men aged <50 years with at least one of the clinical characteristics, 2-year recurrence risk ranged from 6% (major surgery) to 16% (history of cancer). For men ≥50 years with at least one of the characteristics, recurrence risk ranged from 7% (major surgery) to 12% (ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic renal disease). Men aged <50 and ≥50 years without the clinical characteristics all had a recurrence risk of 10%.

Discussion We demonstrated a 2-year recurrence risk of at least 6%, regardless of age category and disease status, in this nationwide cohort of men with VTE. The recurrence risk must be balanced against bleeding risk. However, the high recurrence risk across all subgroups might ultimately lead to greater emphasis on male sex in future guidelines focusing on optimized secondary VTE prevention.

Keywords

venous thromboembolism - recurrence - sex - men - anticoagulation - treatment

• References

• 1 Raskob GE, Angchaisuksiri P, Blanco AN. et al; ISTH Steering Committee for World Thrombosis Day. Thrombosis: a major contributor to global disease burden. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2014; 34 (11) 2363-2371
• 2 Prandoni P, Noventa F, Ghirarduzzi A. et al. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuing anticoagulation in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. A prospective cohort study in 1,626 patients. Haematologica 2007; 92 (02) 199-205
• 3 Søgaard KK, Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Horváth-Puhó E, Sørensen HT. 30-year mortality after venous thromboembolism: a population-based cohort study. Circulation 2014; 130 (10) 829-836
• 4 Albertsen IE, Nielsen PB, Søgaard M. et al. Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Am J Med 2018; 131 (09) 1067-1074.e4
• 5 McRae S, Tran H, Schulman S, Ginsberg J, Kearon C. Effect of patient's sex on risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006; 368 (9533): 371-378
• 6 Douketis J, Tosetto A, Marcucci M. et al. Risk of recurrence after venous thromboembolism in men and women: patient level meta-analysis. BMJ 2011; 342 (342) d813-d813
• 7 Khan F, Rahman A, Carrier M. et al; MARVELOUS Collaborators. Long term risk of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment for first unprovoked venous thromboembolism event: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; 366: l4363
• 8 Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C. et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 2020; 41 (04) 543-603
• 9 Ensor J, Riley RD, Moore D, Snell KI, Bayliss S, Fitzmaurice D. Systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) post-treatment of first unprovoked VTE. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (05) e011190
• 10 Kahn SR, Lim W, Dunn AS. et al. Prevention of VTE in Nonsurgical Patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 (Suppl. 02) e195S-e226S
• 11 Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish national patient register. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39 (Suppl. 07) 30-33
• 12 Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29 (08) 541-549
• 13 Severinsen MT, Kristensen SR, Overvad K, Dethlefsen C, Tjønneland A, Johnsen SP. Venous thromboembolism discharge diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry should be used with caution. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63 (02) 223-228
• 14 Schmidt M, Cannegieter SC, Johannesdottir SA, Dekkers OM, Horváth-Puhó E, Sørensen HT. Statin use and venous thromboembolism recurrence: a combined nationwide cohort and nested case-control study. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12 (08) 1207-1215
• 15 Kildemoes HW, Sørensen HT, Hallas J. The Danish National Prescription Registry. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39 (Suppl. 07) 38-41
• 16 Hellfritzsch M, Husted SE, Grove EL. et al. Treatment changes among users of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2017; 120 (02) 187-194
• 17 Streiff MB, Holmstrom B, Angelini D. et al. NCCN guidelines insights: cancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease, version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018; 16 (11) 1289-1303
• 18 Kearon C, Ageno W, Cannegieter SC, Cosmi B, Geersing GJ, Kyrle PA. Subcommittees on Control of Anticoagulation, and Predictive and Diagnostic Variables in Thrombotic Disease. Categorization of patients as having provoked or unprovoked venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2016; 14 (07) 1480-1483
• 19 Chopard R, Albertsen IE, Piazza G. Diagnosis and treatment of lower extremity venous thromboembolism: a review. JAMA 2020; 324 (17) 1765-1776
• 20 Albertsen IE, Søgaard M, Goldhaber SZ. et al. Development of sex-stratified prediction models for recurrent venous thromboembolism: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Thromb Haemost 2020; 120 (05) 805-814
• 21 Sundbøll J, Adelborg K, Munch T. et al. Positive predictive value of cardiovascular diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: a validation study. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (11) e012832
• 22 Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O'Fallon WM, Melton III LJ. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158 (06) 585-593
• 23 Martinez C, Cohen AT, Bamber L, Rietbrock S. Epidemiology of first and recurrent venous thromboembolism: a population-based cohort study in patients without active cancer. Thromb Haemost 2014; 112 (02) 255-263
• 24 Baglin T, Palmer CR, Luddington R, Baglin C. Unprovoked recurrent venous thrombosis: prediction by D-dimer and clinical risk factors. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6 (04) 577-582
• 25 de Moreuil C, Le Mao R, Le Moigne E. et al. Long-term recurrence risk after a first venous thromboembolism in men and women under 50 years old: a French prospective cohort. Eur J Intern Med 2021; 84: 24-31
• 26 Kearon C, Iorio A, Palareti G. Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the SSC of the ISTH. Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after stopping treatment in cohort studies: recommendation for acceptable rates and standardized reporting. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8 (10) 2313-2315
• 27 Ortel TL, Neumann I, Ageno W. et al. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Blood Adv 2020; 4 (19) 4693-4738
• 28 Albertsen IE, Jensen M, Abdelgawwad K, Søgaard M, Larsen TB, Nielsen PB. Characteristics of patients receiving extended treatment after incident venous thromboembolism. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2021; 129 (04) 332-342
• 29 Khan F, Tritschler T, Le Gal G, Fergusson DA, Rodger MA. Long-term risk for major bleeding during extended oral anticoagulant therapy for first unprovoked venous thromboembolism. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175 (02) W14
• 30 Rodger MA, Kahn SR, Wells PS. et al. Identifying unprovoked thromboembolism patients at low risk for recurrence who can discontinue anticoagulant therapy. CMAJ 2008; 179 (05) 417-426
• 31 Eichinger S, Heinze G, Jandeck LM, Kyrle PA. Risk assessment of recurrence in patients with unprovoked deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: the Vienna prediction model. Circulation 2010; 121 (14) 1630-1636
• 32 Tosetto A, Iorio A, Marcucci M. et al. Predicting disease recurrence in patients with previous unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a proposed prediction score (DASH). J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10 (06) 1019-1025
• 33 Franco Moreno AI, García Navarro MJ, Ortiz Sánchez J. et al. A risk score for prediction of recurrence in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (DAMOVES). Eur J Intern Med 2016; 29: 59-64
• 34 Timp JF, Braekkan SK, Lijfering WM. et al. Prediction of recurrent venous thrombosis in all patients with a first venous thrombotic event: the Leiden Thrombosis Recurrence Risk Prediction model (L-TRRiP). PLoS Med 2019; 16 (10) e1002883
• 35 Rodger MA, Le Gal G, Anderson DR. et al; REVERSE II Study Investigators. Validating the HERDOO2 rule to guide treatment duration for women with unprovoked venous thrombosis: multinational prospective cohort management study. BMJ 2017; 356: j1065
• 36 Marcucci M, Iorio A, Douketis JD. et al. Risk of recurrence after a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: external validation of the Vienna Prediction Model with pooled individual patient data. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13 (05) 775-781
• 37 Tosetto A, Testa S, Martinelli I. et al. External validation of the DASH prediction rule: a retrospective cohort study. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15 (10) 1963-1970
• 38 Franco Moreno AI, García Navarro MJ, Ortiz Sánchez J, Ruiz Giardín JM. Predicting recurrence after a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: retrospective validation of the DAMOVES score. Eur J Intern Med 2017; 41: e15-e16