The Halofixator for the Treatment of Unstable Fractures of the Upper Cervical Spine - Our Own Experience and Narrative Review

Abstract

Introduction In the treatment of upper cervical spine injuries, the semiconservative procedure of the halofixator is now of only secondary importance. Older studies from the 2000 s showed unsatisfactory rates of consolidation as well as high rates of complications. However, due to current data on therapy effectiveness, the literature is inconsistent. The aim of this work is to compare our own experiences and results of treatment with the current literature and to help to clarify the role of the halofixator.

Material and Methods In a monocentric retrospective cohort study, patients with unstable injuries of the axial cervical spine who were to be treated in the halofixator were investigated. Individual variables (sex, age, concomitant diseases, Charlson Comorbidity Index) and treatment characteristics (duration of treatment, consolidation status, complications) were recorded using the electronic medical record. Injuries were classified based on CT data at the time of the accident and at the end of treatment, using common classification systems, and assessed with respect to the rate of consolidation. Possible factors influencing bony consolidation as well as complications were statistically analysed.

Results A total of 54 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median duration of treatment was 83 days. The most common injuries were isolated atlas fracture type III (7; 13%) and isolated dens fracture type III (24; 44%). Bony consolidation was demonstrated in 34 cases (63%) and tight pseudarthrosis in 13 cases (24%). Secondary surgical stabilisation was performed in 6 cases (11%). Isolated type III atlas fractures and type III dens fractures had very high consolidation rates of 86% and 92%, respectively. In the subgroups of patients older than 65 years or with a CCI ≥ 4, unstable pseudarthroses were found more frequently. Complications included pin infection (6%), pin dislocation (9%), and pressure ulceration from the halo vest (6%). Cardiopulmonary complications did not occur. No patient died.

Discussion Good rates of bony consolidation were seen for atlas fractures type III as well as dens fractures type III, which correlate with data in the literature. Dens fractures type II (isolated and combined) and atlas fractures type III in combination with dens fractures showed a worse radiological outcome, which is also unsatisfactory compared to the literature. The rates for procedure-specific complications were relatively low. In particular, work from recent years has demonstrated very good rates for bony consolidation and low complication rates for the treatment of atlas and/or dens fractures with the halofixator, which are confirmed by our results. In contrast, however, a significantly higher cardiac/respiratory complication rate has been reported than occurred in our own patient population.

Keywords

semi-conservative treatment - fractures - cervical spine - halo fixator

Publication History

Received: 04 May 2022

Accepted after revision: 29 September 2022

Article published online:
19 January 2023

• Literatur

• 1 Perry J, Nickel VL. Total cervical spine fusion for neck paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959; 41-A: 37-60 (PMID: 13620686)
• 2 Tashjian RZ, Majercik S, Biffl WL. et al. Halo-vest immobilization increases early morbidity and mortality in elderly odontoid fractures. J Trauma 2006; 60: 199-203 DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197426.72261.17. (PMID: 16456456)
• 3 Horn EM, Theodore N, Feiz-Erfan I. et al. Complications of halo fixation in the elderly. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 5: 46-49 DOI: 10.3171/spi.2006.5.1.46. (PMID: 16850955)
• 4 Majercik S, Tashjian RZ, Biffl WL. et al. Halo vest immobilization in the elderly: a death sentence?. J Trauma 2005; 59: 350-356 DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000174671.07664.7c. (PMID: 16294074)
• 5 Boakye M, Arrigo RT, Kalanithi PS. et al. Impact of age, injury severity score, and medical comorbidities on early complications after fusion and halo-vest immobilization for C2 fractures in older adults: a propensity score matched retrospective cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: 854-859 DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182377486. (PMID: 21971133)
• 6 Schleicher P, Scholz M, Kandziora F. et al. Therapieempfehlungen zur Versorgung von Verletzungen der subaxialen Halswirbelsäule. Z Orthop Unfall 2017; 155: 556-566 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-110855. (PMID: 28728206)
• 7 Schleicher P, Scholz M, Kandziora F. et al. Empfehlungen zur Diagnostik und Therapie oberer Halswirbelsäulenverletzungen: Atlasfrakturen. Z Orthop Unfall 2019; 157: 566-573 DOI: 10.1055/a-0809-5765. (PMID: 30722075)
• 8 Osterhoff G, Schnake K, Scheyerer MJ. et al. Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik und Behandlung von Frakturen des Dens axis bei geriatrischen Patienten. Z Orthop Unfall 2020; 158: 647-656 DOI: 10.1055/a-0989-2791. (PMID: 31634954)
• 9 Koutsogiannis P, Dowling TJ. Halo Brace. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Accessed October 11, 2022 at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557546
• 10 Heyde CE, Krause M, Jarvers JG. et al. Halofixateur und Halotraktion – Stellenwert bei Erkrankungen und Verletzungen der Wirbelsäule im Kindesalter. Z Orthop Unfall 2021; 159: 164-172 DOI: 10.1055/a-1026-6698.
• 11 Kim MK, Shin JJ. Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes after surgical reduction with fixation or halo-vest immobilization for treating unstable atlas fractures. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2019; 161: 685-693 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-019-03824-5. (PMID: 30710241)
• 12 Longo UG, Denaro L, Campi S. et al. Upper cervical spine injuries: indications and limits of the conservative management in Halo vest. A systematic review of efficacy and safety. Injury 2010; 41: 1127-1135 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.025. (PMID: 20889154)
• 13 Patel A, Zakaria R, Al-Mahfoudh R. et al. Conservative management of type II and III odontoid fractures in the elderly at a regional spine centre: A prospective and retrospective cohort study. Br J Neurosurg 2015; 29: 249-253 DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2014.958055. (PMID: 25232807)
• 14 Platzer P, Thalhammer G, Sarahrudi K. et al. Nonoperative management of odontoid fractures using a halothoracic vest. Neurosurgery 2007; 61: 522-529 DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000290898.15567.21. (PMID: 17881964)
• 15 Vieweg U, Schultheiss R. A review of halo vest treatment of upper cervical spine injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001; 121: 50-55 DOI: 10.1007/s004020000182. (PMID: 11195118)
• 16 Fischer LP, Carret JP, Gonon GP. et al. La vascularisation arterielle de l’axis. Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy) 1976; 60: 335-346
• 17 Zhao ZS, Wu GW, Lin J. et al. Management of Combined Atlas Fracture with Type II Odontoid Fracture: A Review of 21 Cases. Indian J Orthop 2019; 53: 518-524 DOI: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_249_18. (PMID: 31303667)
• 18 Isidro S, Molinari R, Ikpeze T. et al. Outcomes of Halo Immobilization for Cervical Spine Fractures. Global Spine J 2019; 9: 521-526 DOI: 10.1177/2192568218808293. (PMID: 31431875)
• 19 Lögters T, Hoppe S, Linhart W. et al. Zur Problematik des Halofixateurs beim alten Patienten. Ergebnisse einer retrospektiven Untersuchung. Unfallchirurg 2006; 109: 306-312 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-005-1051-8.
• 20 Strohm PC, Müller CA, Köstler W. et al. Halo-Fixateur – Indikationen und Komplikationen. Zentralbl Chir 2007; 132: 54-59 DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-960479.
• 21 Shin JJ, Kim SJ, Kim TH. et al. Optimal use of the halo-vest orthosis for upper cervical spine injuries. Yonsei Med J 2010; 51: 648-652 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.5.648. (PMID: 20635437)
• 22 Lopes A, Andrade A, Silva I. et al. Brain Abscess After Halo Fixation for the Cervical Spine. World Neurosurg 2017; 104: 1047.e7-1047.e11 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.033. (PMID: 28522382)
• 23 Cheong ML, Chan CYW, Saw LB. et al. Pneumocranium secondary to halo vest pin penetration through an enlarged frontal sinus. Eur Spine J 2009; 18 (Suppl. 02) S269-S271 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1004-y.
• 24 van Middendorp JJ, Slooff WB, Nellestein WR. et al. Incidence of and risk factors for complications associated with halo-vest immobilization: a prospective, descriptive cohort study of 239 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 71-79 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01347. (PMID: 19122081)
• 25 Sharpe JP, Magnotti LJ, Weinberg JA. et al. The old man and the C-spine fracture: Impact of halo vest stabilization in patients with blunt cervical spine fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016; 80: 76-80 DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000894. (PMID: 26491800)
• 26 DePasse JM, Palumbo MA, Ahmed AK. et al. Halo-Vest Immobilization in Elderly Odontoid Fracture Patients: Evolution in Treatment Modality and In-Hospital Outcomes. Clin Spine Surg 2017; 30: E1206-E1210 DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000483. (PMID: 27906741)
• 27 Kurucan E, Sulovari A, Thirukumaran C. et al. Volume-outcome relationship in halo vest utilization for C2 fractures. Spine J 2020; 20: 1676-1684 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.543. (PMID: 32474222)
• 28 De Bonis P, Iaccarino C, Musio A. et al. Functional Outcome of Elderly Patients Treated for Odontoid Fracture: A Multicenter Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019; 44: 951-958 DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002982. (PMID: 31205176)
• 29 Girardo M, Rava A, Gargiulo G. et al. Clinical and radiological union rate evaluation of type 2 odontoid fractures: A comparison between anterior screw fixation and halo vest in elderly patients. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2018; 9: 254-259 DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_93_18. (PMID: 30783350)