Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ultrasound Int Open 2022; 08(02): E59-E67
DOI: 10.1055/a-1971-7454
Original Article

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Bespoke Multiorgan Ultrasound Approach in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

Casper Falster 
1   Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
2   Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
3   OPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
Gro Egholm 
4   Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
Rune Wiig
2   Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
,
Mikael Kjær Poulsen 
4   Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
Jacob Eifer Møller 
4   Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
Stefan Posth 
5   Department of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
Mikkel Brabrand 
5   Department of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
Christian Borbjerg Laursen 
1   Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
2   Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
› Author Affiliations Funding Information Syddansk Universitet — http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006356; Master Carpenter Jacobsen foundation — Odense Universitetshospital — http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004196;
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose The aims of this study were to prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of a bespoke multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound approach for suspected pulmonary embolism and evaluate if this model allows reduced referral to further radiation diagnostics while maintaining safety standards.

Materials and Methods Patients with suspected pulmonary embolism referred for CT pulmonary angiography or ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy were included as a convenience sample. All patients were subject to blinded ultrasound investigation with cardiac, lung, and deep venous ultrasound. The sensitivity and specificity of applied ultrasound signs and the hypothetical reduction in the need for further diagnostic workup were calculated.

Results 75 patients were prospectively enrolled. The Wells score was below 2 in 48 patients, between 2 and 6 in 24 patients, and above 6 in 3 patients. The prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 28%. The most notable ultrasound signs were presence of a deep venous thrombus, at least two hypoechoic pleural-based lesions, the D-sign, the 60/60-sign, and a visible right ventricular thrombus which all had a specificity of 100%. Additionally, a multiorgan ultrasound investigation with no findings compatible with pulmonary embolism yielded a sensitivity of 95.2% (95%CI: 76.2–99.9). CT or scintigraphy could be safely avoided in 70% of cases (95%CI: 63.0–83.1%).

Conclusion The findings of our study suggest that implementation of a multiorgan ultrasound assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism may safely reduce the need for CT or scintigraphy by confirming or dismissing the suspicion.

Key words

ultrasound -  methods & techniques - echocardiography - embolization - embolism/thrombosis - themes


Publication History

Received: 21 March 2022

Accepted after revision: 23 October 2022

Article published online:
16 January 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Laack TA, Goyal DG. Pulmonary embolism: an unsuspected killer. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2004; 22: 961-983
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Stein PD, Beemath A, Matta F. et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with acute pulmonary embolism: data from PIOPED II. Am J Med 2007; 120: 871-879
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Huisman MV. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA 2006; 295: 172-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Galié N. et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020. 41. 543–603 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Raja AS, Greenberg JO, Qaseem A. et al. Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163: 701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z. et al. Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 2013; 346: f2360-f2360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Righini M, Robert-Ebadi H, Le Gal G. Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15: 1251-1261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Le Gal G, Bounameaux H. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: running after the decreasing prevalence of cases among suspected patients. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1244-1246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Falster C, Jacobsen N, Coman KE. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of focused deep venous, lung, cardiac and multiorgan ultrasound in suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax 2022; 77: 679-689 . doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-216838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-Care Ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 749-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Díaz G. et al. Prognostic Significance of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients Presenting with Acute Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism. American Thoracic Society 2012; 181: 983-991 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200908-1204OC.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Laursen CB, Rahman NM, Volpicelli G. Thoracic Ultrasound. In: Thoracic Ultrasound. European Respiratory Society. 2018
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Aktürk UA, Koçak ND, Ernam D. The role of multi-organ ultrasonography for diagnosing non-massive pulmonary thromboembolism. Biomed Res. 2017. 28. 8044-8049
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Koenig S, Chandra S, Alaverdian A. et al. Ultrasound assessment of pulmonary embolism in patients receiving CT pulmonary angiography. Chest. 2014. 145. 818-823
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Nazerian P, Vanni S, Volpicelli G. et al. Accuracy of Point-of-Care Multiorgan Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism. Chest 2014; 145: 950-957
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Altman DG. et al. STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e012799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Laursen CB, Sloth E, Lassen AT. et al. Point-of-care ultrasonography in patients admitted with respiratory symptoms: A single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2: 638-646
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Riishede M, Laursen CB, Teglbjærg LS. et al. Diagnostic value of whole-body-focused ultrasonography in high-acuity patients in the emergency department: a prospective single-center cross-sectional study. Ultrasound J 2019; 11: 11 DOI: 10.1186/s13089-019-0126-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Nazerian P, Volpicelli G, Gigli C. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac and venous ultrasound examinations in patients with shock and suspected pulmonary embolism. Intern Emerg Med Italy 2018; 13: 567-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nazerian P, Volpicelli G, Gigli C. et al. Diagnostic Performance of Wells Score Combined With Point-of-care Lung and Venous Ultrasound in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. Acad Emerg Med. 2017. 24. 270-280
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Dwyer KH, Rempell JS, Stone MB. Diagnosing centrally located pulmonary embolisms in the emergency department using point-of-care ultrasound. Am J Emerg Med. 2018. 36. 1145-1150
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Ceriani E, Combescure C, Le Gal G. et al. Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 957-970
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Walsh BM, Moore CL. McConnell’s Sign Is Not Specific for Pulmonary Embolism: Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Emerg Med 2015; 49: 301-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Fields JM, Davis J, Girson L. et al. Transthoracic Echocardiography for Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017. ; 30: 714–723.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.03.004
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE. et al. STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015; 351: h5527 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h5527.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME. et al. Quadas-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 529–536 DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar