PDF herunterladen
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2168-9081
Original Thoracic

Continuous Analgesia with Intercostal Catheterization after Thoracoscopy

Yifei Wang   *
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
,
Qi Sun   *
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
,
Yiling Huang   *
2   Department of Nursing, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
,
Qinghua Yang   *
3   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
,
Rong Chen
2   Department of Nursing, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
,
Xianwei Zhang
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
,
Xuewei Zhao
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
,
Mingdong Wang
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
› Institutsangaben Funding This work was supported by the Hongkou District Health and Family Planning Commission (2103-06), Shanghai, China.
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Abstract

Background There are few studies on continuous intercostal nerve block after single operation hole thoracoscopic surgery, that is, two-port thoracoscopic surgery.

Objective To evaluate the analgesic effect of continuous intercostal nerve block after thoracoscopic surgery.

Methods A total of 80 patients who underwent single operation hole thoracoscopic surgery in our hospital between September 2020 and June 2021 were enrolled and divided into two groups. Based on basic analgesia, an intercostal catheter was placed during the operation for continuous intercostal block analgesia after the operation in the experimental group (group A, n = 40). The control group (group B, n = 40) was treated with sufentanil intravenous analgesia after surgery, which is namely “basic analgesia.” The postoperative pain scores, restlessness during the recovery period, effect on reducing opioid use, postoperative chest complications, patient satisfaction, etc., were compared between the two groups.

Results The pain scores of patients in group A were significantly lower compared with those in group B at 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after surgery (3.325 ± 1.163 vs. 4.550 ± 1.176, 2.650 ± 1.001 vs. 4.000 ± 1.038, 2.325 ± 0.917 vs. 3.700 ± 0.966, and 1.775 ± 1.050 vs. 3.150 ± 1.075, p < 0.001, respectively). Sufentanil consumption in group A was significantly lower than in group B at 48 hours after surgery (98.625 ± 4.158 vs. 106.000 ± 7.228, p < 0.001).

Conclusion Multimodal analgesia is ideal for early pain control after thoracotomy. A continuous intercostal nerve block can effectively reduce postoperative pain in patients.

Keywords

thoracoscopy/VATS - postoperative - lung - treatment

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors, Mingdong Wang and Xuewei Zhao, upon reasonable request.


Ethical Approval Statement

Ethics committee of Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital and Internal Review Board of Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital have approved this study (NO.: 2020129-001). Declaration of Helsinki and International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans are followed. The patients have provided consent for participating the study and publication of the data on any journal.


Authors' Contribution

Y.W., Q.S., and Y.H. drafted the manuscript. They completed the manuscript with approximately the same number of words. Q.Y. performed statistical analysis. This is crucial for the article. M.W. and Y.W. performed analysis and interpretation of the data. X.Z. and R.C. collected data. M.W. and X.Z. designed the study. The research design and guidance implementation were both completed in close collaboration between the two individuals. Critical revision of the manuscript was done by M.W.


* These authors contributed equally to this work.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 03. Mai 2023

Angenommen: 05. September 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
06. September 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. Oktober 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Leserbrief zu diesem Artikel:

Comment on: “Continuous Analgesia with Intercostal Catheterization under the Thoracoscopy”Thorac Cardiovasc Surg eFirst
DOI: 10.1055/a-2192-5837

 

  • References

  • 1 Marshall K, McLaughlin K. Pain management in thoracic surgery. Thorac Surg Clin 2020; 30 (03) 339-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Thompson C, French DG, Costache I. Pain management within an enhanced recovery program after thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10 (Suppl. 32) S3773-S3780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Yeung JH, Gates S, Naidu BV, Wilson MJ, Gao Smith F. Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2 (02) CD009121
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Leslie K, Myles P, Devereaux P. et al. Neuraxial block, death and serious cardiovascular morbidity in the POISE trial. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111 (03) 382-390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zha J, Ji S, Wang C, Yang Z, Qiao S, An J. Thoracic paravertebral nerve block with ropivacaine and adjuvant dexmedetomidine produced longer analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized trial. J Healthc Eng 2021; 2021: 1846886
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Detterbeck FC. Efficacy of methods of intercostal nerve blockade for pain relief after thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80 (04) 1550-1559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wildgaard K, Petersen RH, Hansen HJ, Møller-Sørensen H, Ringsted TK, Kehlet H. Multimodal analgesic treatment in video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy using an intraoperative intercostal catheter. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 41 (05) 1072-1077
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mercieri M, D'Andrilli A, Arcioni R. Improving postoperative pain management after video-assisted thoracic surgery lung resection contributes to enhanced recovery, but guidelines are still lacking. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10 (Suppl. 09) S983-S987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Li C, Xu M, Xu G, Xiong R, Wu H, Xie M. A comparative study of acute and chronic pain between single port and triple port video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer [in Chinese]. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 2018; 21 (04) 279-284
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Li T, Xia L, Wang J. et al. Uniportal versus three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study. Thorac Cancer 2021; 12 (08) 1147-1153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mizukami Y, Takahashi Y, Adachi H. Single-port vs conventional three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection: comparison of postoperative pain and surgical costs. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 27 (02) 91-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ye Z, Zhang B, Chen Y, Lin J. Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett 2019; 18 (02) 1311-1317
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mu JW, Gao SG, Xue Q. et al. A propensity matched comparison of effects between video assisted thoracoscopic single-port, two-port and three-port pulmonary resection on lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8 (07) 1469-1476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Qin SL, Huang JB, Yang YL, Xian L. Uniportal versus three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 2015; 7 (12) 2274-2287
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tamura M, Shimizu Y, Hashizume Y. Pain following thoracoscopic surgery: retrospective analysis between single-incision and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 8: 153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fiorelli A, Santini M. Total intravenous anaesthesia with local anaesthesia for controlling pain after spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracic surgery: is it a viable strategy?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 52 (01) 200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Finucane BT. Ropivacaine cardiac toxicity–not as troublesome as bupivacaine. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52 (05) 449-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ohmura S, Kawada M, Ohta T, Yamamoto K, Kobayashi T. Systemic toxicity and resuscitation in bupivacaine-, levobupivacaine-, or ropivacaine-infused rats. Anesth Analg 2001; 93 (03) 743-748
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63 (Suppl. 11) S240-S252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: which to use?. Am J Emerg Med 2018; 36 (04) 707-714
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wang Y, Sun Q, Huang Y. et al. Continuous analgesia with intercostal catheterization under the thoracoscopy. Available at: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2807910/v1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar