Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2181-8382
Case Report

Nonabsorbable Barbed Sutures for Diastasis Recti. A Useful Device with Unexpected Risk: Two Case Reports

Lorenzo Giorgi 
1   Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas S. Pio X Hospital, Milan, IT, Italy
2   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
,
Veronica Ponti 
3   Plastic Surgery Service, Humanitas S. Pio X Hospital, Milan, IT, Italy
,
Filippo Boriani 
4   Department of Plastic Surgery and Microsurgery, University Hospital of Cagliari, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, CA, Italy
,
Andrea Margara 
3   Plastic Surgery Service, Humanitas S. Pio X Hospital, Milan, IT, Italy
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The introduction of nonabsorbable barbed sutures in plastic surgery has allowed the achievement of significant results in terms of efficacy and short- and long-term outcomes. However, a nonabsorbable material with no antibacterial coating could act as a substrate for subclinical bacterial colonization and thereby determine recurrent subacute and chronic infective–inflammatory processes. The authors report a clinical experience of subacute infectious complications after two cases of diastasis recti surgical correction. The authors present a two-case series in which a nonabsorbable barbed suture was used for the repair of diastasis recti. The postoperative course was complicated by surgical site infection. The origin of the infectious process was clearly localized in the fascial suture used for diastasis correction. The suture was colonized by bacteria resulting in the formation of multiple granulomas of the abdominal wall a few months postoperatively. In both the reported cases, the patients partially responded to the antibiotic targeted therapy and reoperation was required. The microbiological analyses confirmed the colonization of sutures by Staphylococcus aureus. Barbed nonabsorbable sutures should be avoided for diastasis recti surgical correction to minimize the risk of infectious suture-related complications. The paper's main novel aspect is that this is the first clinical report describing infectious complications after surgical correction of diastasis recti with barbed polypropylene sutures. The risk of microbiological subclinical colonization of polypropylene suture untreated with antibacterial coating, therefore, should be taken into account.

Keywords

diastasis recti - abdominal wall - nonabsorbable barbed suture - granulomas - polypropylene suture

Authors' Contributions

LG: conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation

VP: conceptualization, data curation

FB: conceptualization, writing—reviewing and editing, Supervision

AM: conceptualization and supervision.


Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the author.


Patient Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from every patient.




Publication History

Received: 16 March 2023

Accepted: 16 September 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
26 September 2023

Article published online:
04 March 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Apovian CM. Obesity: definition, comorbidities, causes, and burden. Am J Manag Care 2016; 22 (07) s176-s185
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Shermak MA. The application of barbed sutures in body contouring surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (03) 72S-75S
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Fowler JR, Perkins TA, Buttaro BA, Truant AL. Bacteria adhere less to barbed monofilament than braided sutures in a contaminated wound model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (02) 665-671
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Chawla H, van der List JP, Fein NB, Henry MW, Pearle AD. Barbed suture is associated with increased risk of wound infection after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (07) 1561-1567
    Google Scholar
  • 5 ElHawary H, Abdelhamid K, Meng F, Janis JEA. A comprehensive, evidence-based literature review of the surgical treatment of rectus diastasis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (05) 1151-1164
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Hernández-Granados P, Henriksen NA, Berrevoet F. et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on management of rectus diastasis. Br J Surg 2021; 108 (10) 1189-1191
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Rosen A, Hartman T. Repair of the midline fascial defect in abdominoplasty with long-acting barbed and smooth absorbable sutures. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (06) 668-673
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Vestby LK, Grønseth T, Simm R, Nesse LL. Bacterial biofilm and its role in the pathogenesis of disease. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020; 9 (02) 59
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Kostakioti M, Hadjifrangiskou M, Hultgren SJ. Bacterial biofilms: development, dispersal, and therapeutic strategies in the dawn of the postantibiotic era. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2013; 3 (04) a010306
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Edmiston CE, Seabrook GR, Goheen MP. et al. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination?. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203 (04) 481-489
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Chalya PL, Massinde AN, Kihunrwa A, Mabula JB. Abdominal fascia closure following elective midline laparotomy: a surgical experience at a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania. BMC Res Notes 2015; 8: 281
    Google Scholar
  • 12 van Uchelen JH, Kon M, Werker PM. The long-term durability of plication of the anterior rectus sheath assessed by ultrasonography. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (06) 1578-1584
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Gutowski KA, Warner JP. Incorporating barbed sutures in abdominoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (03) 76S-81S
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Diener MK, Knebel P, Kieser M. et al. Effectiveness of triclosan-coated PDS Plus versus uncoated PDS II sutures for prevention of surgical site infection after abdominal wall closure: the randomised controlled PROUD trial. Lancet 2014; 384 (9938) 142-152
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Rapid Response Reports . In: Antibacterial Sutures for Wound Closure After Surgery: A Review of Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness and Guidelines for Use. Ottawa, ON:: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health;; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Konstantelias AA, Andriakopoulou CS, Mourgela S. Triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical-site infections: a meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg 2017; 117 (03) 137-148
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Onesti MG, Carella S, Scuderi N. Effectiveness of antimicrobial-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical site infection: a review of the literature. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2018; 22 (17) 5729-5739
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Vieira D, Angel SN, Honjol Y. et al. Engineering surgical stitches to prevent bacterial infection. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 834
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Baygar T, Sarac N, Ugur A, Karaca IR. Antimicrobial characteristics and biocompatibility of the surgical sutures coated with biosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Bioorg Chem 2019; 86: 254-258
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Vorobyova V, Vasyliev G, Uschapovskiy D, Lyudmyla K, Skiba M. Green synthesis, characterization of silver nanoparticles for biomedical application and environmental remediation. J Microbiol Methods 2022; 193: 106384
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Syukri DM, Nwabor OF, Singh S. et al. Antibacterial-coated silk surgical sutures by ex situ deposition of silver nanoparticles synthesized with Eucalyptus camaldulensis eradicates infections. J Microbiol Methods 2020; 174: 105955
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Liu X, Gao P, Du J, Zhao X, Wong KKY. Long-term anti-inflammatory efficacy in intestinal anastomosis in mice using silver nanoparticle-coated suture. J Pediatr Surg 2017; 52 (12) 2083-2087
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Baygar T. Characterization of silk sutures coated with propolis and biogenic silver nanoparticles (AgNPs); an eco-friendly solution with wound healing potential against surgical site infections (SSIs). Turk J Med Sci 2020; 50 (01) 258-266
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Ho CH, Odermatt EK, Berndt I, Tiller JC. Long-term active antimicrobial coatings for surgical sutures based on silver nanoparticles and hyperbranched polylysine. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2013; 24 (13) 1589-1600
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Irfan M, Munir H, Ismail H. Characterization and fabrication of zinc oxide nanoparticles by gum Acacia modesta through green chemistry and impregnation on surgical sutures to boost up the wound healing process. Int J Biol Macromol 2022; 204: 466-475
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Franco AR, Fernandes EM, Rodrigues MT. et al. Antimicrobial coating of spider silk to prevent bacterial attachment on silk surgical sutures. Acta Biomater 2019; 99: 236-246
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Wang X, Liu P, Wu Q. et al. Sustainable antibacterial and anti-inflammatory silk suture with surface modification of combined-therapy drugs for surgical site infection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2022; 14 (09) 11177-11191
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Otto-Lambertz C, Decker L, Adams A, Yagdiran A, Eysel P. Can triclosan-coated sutures reduce the postoperative rate of wound infection? Data from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2023; 174 (03) 638-646
    Google Scholar
  • 29 He P, Liu Z, Chen H, Huang G, Mao W, Li A. The role of triclosan-coated suture in preventing surgical infection: a meta-analysis. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2023; 34 (01) 42-49
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Miyoshi N, Fujino S, Nishimura J. et al; Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Colorectal Cancer Treatment Group (CSGOCG). Effectiveness of triclosan-coated sutures compared with uncoated sutures in preventing surgical site infection after abdominal wall closure in open/laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234 (06) 1147-1159 Erratum in: J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Dec 1;235(6):968–969. Erratum in: J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Oct 1;235(4):689–691
    Google Scholar