Minimally Invasive Cesarean Section – Extraperitoneal Cesarean Section. The Outcomes of Applying to the Same Patient More than Once. Case Series

Abstract

Background Extraperitoneal caesarean section (EPCS) provides intraoperative and postoperative advantages to patients compared to transperitoneal (TPCS). Nevertheless, it is less preferred.

Methods Extraperitoneal caesarean section (EPCS) is a type of caesarean section performed without entering the peritoneal cavity.

Results In this study, EPCS was successfully performed again in patients who had previously undergone EPCS.

Conclusion This method, which reduces maternal mortality and health expenditures, can be performed more than once.

Key words

Extraperitoneal caesarean section - minimal invasive ceaserian section - repetat extraperitoneal caesarean section

Publication History

Received: 30 August 2023

Accepted after revision: 07 November 2023

Article published online:
14 December 2023

• References

• 1 Bates GW, Shomento S. Adhesion prevention in patients with multiple cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: S19-24
• 2 Gurol-Urganci I, Bou-Antoun S, Lim CP. et al. Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human reproduction 2013; 28: 1943-1952
• 3 Weibel S, Neubert K, Jelting Y. et al. Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016; 33: 853-865
• 4 Andolf E, Thorsell M, Kallen K. Cesarean delivery and risk for postoperative adhesions and intestinal obstruction: a nested case-control study of the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 406e1-6
• 5 Hibbard LT. Extraperitoneal cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1985; 28: 711-721
• 6 Tappauf C, Schest E, Reif P. et al. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a prospective randomized comparison of surgical morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 338.e1-8
• 7 Yapca OE, Topdagi YE, AI RA. Fetus delivery time in extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33: 657-663
• 8 Tappauf C, Schest E, Reif P. et al. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a prospective randomized comparison of surgical morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 338.e1-8
• 9 Khoiwal K, Sheoran D, Mishra R. et.al Comparison of extra-peritoneal cesarean section with conventional trans-peritoneal cesarean section: An open label randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023; 19: 100212
• 10 Vaswani BP, Trivedi A, Gopal S. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a retrospective analysis. Int J Reprod Contracept. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 9: 567-569
• 11 Bebincy DS, Chitra J. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section in surgical morbidity in a tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 6: 3397-3399
• 12 Chao Ji, Meng C, Eichen Q. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a retrospective study. Postgrad Med 2023; 135: 38-42
• 13 Shlomi S, Inna B, Rabia B. et al. Comparison between modified French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section to the standard cesarean technique – a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5: 100910
• 14 Dimassi K, Ami O, Fauck D. et al. French ambulatory cesarean: Mother and newborn safety. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 148: 198-204
• 15 Mukhopadhyay D, Gada R, Rufford B. Repeat extraperitoneal cesarean section on a woman with pseudomyxoma peritonei. J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 37: 370-372