Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2024; 85(S 02): e86-e96
DOI: 10.1055/a-2215-6209
Original Article

Outcomes after Surgical Resection of Jugular Foramen Schwannomas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Haydn Hoffman
1   Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States
,
Brendan B. Maloney
1   Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States
,
Dan Y. Draytsel
1   Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States
,
Harish Babu
1   Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after surgical resection of jugular foramen schwannomas (JFSs).

Design A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Setting PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched.

Participants Case series of at least five patients undergoing surgical resection of JFSs were included.

Main Outcome Measures Primary outcomes included gross total resection (GTR) and near total resection (NTR) rates, as well as a composite of the two (GTR + NTR). Additional outcomes included new or worsening cranial nerve (CN) palsies and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Random effects models were used to generate pooled outcomes.

Results A total of 25 studies comprising 567 patients were included in the study. The proportions of each tumor grade were the following: grade A (33.1%), grade B (16.1%), grade C (9.2%), and grade D (41.6%). The pooled rate of GTR was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70–88; I 2 = 78.9%) and the composite GTR + NTR rate was 88% (95% CI: 81–93; I 2 = 66.4%). Rates of new or worsening CN palsies were the following: 12% hearing loss (95% CI: 7–20; I 2 = 69.4%), 27% dysphagia (95% CI: 20–36; I 2 = 66%), 20% hoarseness (95% CI: 14–28; I 2 = 62.6%), and 19% facial palsy (95% CI: 13–28; I 2 = 64.6%). The pooled rate of CSF leak was 9% (95% CI: 6–15; I 2 = 43.9%).

Conclusion The literature suggests high GTR rates of JFSs can be achieved. However, new CN deficits are not uncommon.

Keywords

schwannoma - jugular foramen - resection - microsurgery

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 15 July 2023

Accepted: 20 November 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
22 November 2023

Article published online:
13 December 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Bakar B. The jugular foramen schwannomas: review of the large surgical series. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2008; 44 (05) 285-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Eldevik OPGT, Gabrielsen TO, Jacobsen EA. Imaging findings in schwannomas of the jugular foramen. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21 (06) 1139-1144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Samii M, Babu RP, Tatagiba M, Sepehrnia A. Surgical treatment of jugular foramen schwannomas. J Neurosurg 1995; 82 (06) 924-932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bal J, Bruneau M, Berhouma M. et al. Management of non-vestibular schwannomas in adult patients: a systematic review and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section part III: lower cranial nerve schwannomas, jugular foramen (CN IX, X, XI) and hypoglossal schwannoma (XII). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022; 164 (02) 321-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Samii M, Alimohamadi M, Gerganov V. Surgical treatment of jugular foramen schwannoma: surgical treatment based on a new classification. Neurosurgery 2015; 77 (03) 424-432 , discussion 432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bulsara KR, Sameshima T, Friedman AH, Fukushima T. Microsurgical management of 53 jugular foramen schwannomas: lessons learned incorporated into a modified grading system. J Neurosurg 2008; 109 (05) 794-803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hasegawa T, Kato T, Kida Y. et al. Gamma Knife surgery for patients with jugular foramen schwannomas: a multiinstitutional retrospective study in Japan. J Neurosurg 2016; 125 (04) 822-831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Palmisciano P, Ferini G, Watanabe G. et al. Surgical management of craniovertebral junction schwannomas: a systematic review. Curr Oncol 2022; 29 (07) 4842-4855
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62 (10) 1006-1012
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kaye AH, Hahn JF, Kinney SE, Hardy Jr RW, Bay JW. Jugular foramen schwannomas. J Neurosurg 1984; 60 (05) 1045-1053
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Pellet W, Cannoni M, Pech A. The widened transcochlear approach to jugular foramen tumors. J Neurosurg 1988; 69 (06) 887-894
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Munn Z, Barker TH, Moola S. et al. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth 2020; 18 (10) 2127-2133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Shi L, Lin L. The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (23) e15987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Di Vitantonio H, Tozzi A, De Paulis D. et al. Extracranial jugular foramen schwannomas treated with the extreme lateral juxtacondylar approach: surgical technique and our experience. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2023; 24 (04) 425-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Aftahy AK, Groll M, Barz M. et al. Surgical management of jugular foramen schwannomas. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13 (16) 4218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wang X, Liang J, Li M. et al. Surgical treatment of dumbbell-shaped jugular foramen schwannomas via two-piece lateral suboccipital approach: report of 26 patients. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 94: 32-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wang X, Long W, Liu D, Yuan J, Xiao Q, Liu Q. Optimal surgical approaches and treatment outcomes in patients with jugular foramen schwannomas: a single institution series of 31 cases and a literature review. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 43 (05) 1339-1350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ryu SM, Lee JI, Park K. et al. Optimal treatment of jugular foramen schwannomas: long-term outcome of a multidisciplinary approach for a series of 29 cases in a single institute. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159 (08) 1517-1527
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Park ES, Lee EJ, Park JB. et al. A single-institution retrospective study of jugular foramen schwannoma management: radical resection versus subtotal intracranial resection through a retrosigmoid suboccipital approach followed by radiosurgery. World Neurosurg 2016; 88: 552-562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Zeng XJ, Li D, Hao SY. et al. Long-term functional and recurrence outcomes of surgically treated jugular foramen schwannomas: a 20-year experience. World Neurosurg 2016; 86: 134-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nowak A, Dziedzic T, Czernicki T, Kunert P, Marchel A. Surgical treatment of jugular foramen schwannomas. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2014; 48 (03) 188-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Sedney CL, Nonaka Y, Bulsara KR, Fukushima T. Microsurgical management of jugular foramen schwannomas. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (01) 42-46 , discussion 46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wan JH, Wu YH, Li ZJ. et al. Triple dumbbell-shaped jugular foramen schwannomas. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40 (04) 354-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sutiono AB, Kawase T, Tabuse M. et al. Importance of preserved periosteum around jugular foramen neurinomas for functional outcome of lower cranial nerves: anatomic and clinical studies. Neurosurgery 2011; 69 (2, Suppl Operative): ons230-ons240 , discussion ons240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chibbaro S, Mirone G, Makiese O, Bresson D, George B. Dumbbell-shaped jugular foramen schwannomas: surgical management, outcome and complications on a series of 16 patients. Neurosurg Rev 2009; 32 (02) 151-159 , discussion 159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cho YS, So YK, Park K. et al. Surgical outcomes of lateral approach for jugular foramen schwannoma: postoperative facial nerve and lower cranial nerve functions. Neurosurg Rev 2009; 32 (01) 61-66 , discussion 66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fukuda M, Oishi M, Saito A, Fujii Y. Long-term outcomes after surgical treatment of jugular foramen schwannoma. Skull Base 2009; 19 (06) 401-408
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sanna M, Bacciu A, Falcioni M, Taibah A. Surgical management of jugular foramen schwannomas with hearing and facial nerve function preservation: a series of 23 cases and review of the literature. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (12) 2191-2204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Wilson MA, Hillman TA, Wiggins RH, Shelton C. Jugular foramen schwannomas: diagnosis, management, and outcomes. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (08) 1486-1492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kadri PA, Al-Mefty O. Surgical treatment of dumbbell-shaped jugular foramen schwannomas. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 17 (02) E9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Cokkeser Y, Brackmann DE, Fayad JN. Conservative facial nerve management in jugular foramen schwannomas. Am J Otol 2000; 21 (02) 270-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Yoo H, Jung HW, Yang HJ. Jugular foramen schwannomas: surgical approaches and outcome of treatment. Skull Base Surg 1999; 9 (04) 243-252
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Tan LC, Bordi L, Symon L, Cheesman AD. Jugular foramen neuromas: a review of 14 cases. Surg Neurol 1990; 34 (04) 205-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Franklin DJ, Moore GF, Fisch U. Jugular foramen peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Laryngoscope 1989; 99 (10 Pt 1): 1081-1087
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Pluchino F, Crivelli G, Vaghi MA. Intracranial neurinomas of the nerves of the jugular foramen. Report of 12 personal cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1975; 31 (3-4): 201-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hoffman H, Babu H. Retrosigmoid craniotomy for endoscope-assisted resection of a jugular foramen schwannoma: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2023; 25 (04) e227-e228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 van de Langenberg R, Hanssens PE, van Overbeeke JJ. et al. Management of large vestibular schwannoma. Part I. Planned subtotal resection followed by Gamma Knife surgery: radiological and clinical aspects. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (05) 875-884
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Luryi AL, Kveton JF, Babu S, Bojrab DI, Michaelides EM, Schutt CA. Evolving role of non-total resection in management of acoustic neuroma in the gamma knife era. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41 (10) e1354-e1359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Khan NR, Elarjani T, Jamshidi AM. et al. Microsurgical management of vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma): facial nerve outcomes, radiographic analysis, complications, and long-term follow-up in a series of 420 surgeries. World Neurosurg 2022; 168: e297-e308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 de Boer NP, Koot RW, Jansen JC. et al. Prognostic factors for the outcome of translabyrinthine surgery for vestibular schwannomas. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42 (03) 475-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kano H, Meola A, Yang HC. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for jugular foramen schwannomas: an international multicenter study. J Neurosurg 2018; 129 (04) 928-936
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Kim YG, Park CK, Jung NY. et al. Early-onset adverse events after stereotactic radiosurgery for jugular foramen schwannoma: a mid-term follow-up single-center review of 46 cases. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17 (01) 89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar