Facial Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2219-9266
Original Article

“Should Pediatric Septal Surgery and Septorhinoplasty Be Performed for Nasal Obstruction?”—A Systematic Review of the Literature

Theodore Howard
1   Department of Rhinology and Otolaryngology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Isabelle Williams
1   Department of Rhinology and Otolaryngology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Annakan Navaratnam
1   Department of Rhinology and Otolaryngology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Nora Haloob
1   Department of Rhinology and Otolaryngology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Kostadin Stoenchev
2   Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Hesham Saleh
1   Department of Rhinology and Otolaryngology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Corrective septal surgery for children with nasal obstruction has historically been avoided due to concern about the impact on the growing nose, with disruption of midfacial growth. However, there is a paucity of data evaluating complication and revision rates post-nasal septal surgery in the pediatric population. In addition, there is evidence to suggest that failure to treat nasal obstruction in children may itself result in facial deformity and/or developmental delay. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of septal surgery in pediatric patients with nasal obstruction. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Original studies in pediatric patients (<18 years of age) with nasal obstruction were eligible for inclusion. Patients with cleft lip or palate as their primary diagnosis were excluded. Our primary outcomes were patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), postsurgical complications, and revision rates. Secondary outcomes included surgical technique, anatomical considerations, and anthropometric measurements. Eighteen studies were included (1,080 patients). Patients underwent septoplasty, septorhinoplasty, rhinoplasty, or a combination of procedures for nasal obstruction. Obstruction was commonly reported secondary to trauma, nasal septal deviation, or congenital deformity. The mean age of the patients was 13.04 years with an average follow-up of 41.8 months. In all, 5.6% patients required revision surgery and there was an overall complication rate of 7.8%. Septal surgery for nasal obstruction in children has low revision and complication rates. However, a pediatric-specific outcome measure is yet to be determined. Larger prospective studies with long-term follow-up periods are needed to determine the optimal timing of nasal surgery for nasal obstruction in the pediatric population.



Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
30 November 2023

Article published online:
15 March 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 van Loosen J, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Van Zanten GA, Engel T, Lanjewar DN, van Velzen D. A cephalometric analysis of nasal septal growth. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1997; 22 (05) 453-458
  • 2 Funamura JL, Sykes JM. Pediatric septorhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (04) 503-508
  • 3 Sarnat BG, Wexler MR. Growth of the face and jaws after resection of the septal cartilage in the rabbit. Am J Anat 1966; 118 (03) 755-767
  • 4 Loeb HW. Submucous resection of the nasal septum: indications and contra-indications. J Am Med Assoc 1912; LIX (12) 1132-1136
  • 5 Turner L, Charles Hayton BH. Reports for the year 1915 from the Throat and Ear Department of the Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh an investigation into the results of the submucous resection of the septum in children. J Laryngol Otol 1916; 31 (04) 132-138
  • 6 Farrior RT, Connolly ME. Septorhinoplasty in children. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1970; 3 (02) 345-364
  • 7 Christophel JJ, Gross CW. Pediatric septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009; 42 (02) 287-294 , ix
  • 8 Freng A. Mid-facial sagittal growth following resection of the nasal septum-vomer: a roentgencephalometric study in the domestic cat. Acta Otolaryngol 1981; 92 (3–4): 363-370
  • 9 Cupero TM, Middleton CE, Silva AB. Effects of functional septoplasty on the facial growth of ferrets. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 127 (11) 1367-1369
  • 10 Cingi C, Muluk NB, Ulusoy S. et al. Septoplasty in children. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2016; 30 (02) e42-e47
  • 11 Gupta A, Svider PF, Rayess H. et al. Pediatric rhinoplasty: a discussion of perioperative considerations and systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 92: 11-16
  • 12 Saniasiaya J, Abdullah B. Quality of life in children following nasal septal surgery: a review of its outcome. Pediatr Investig 2019; 3 (03) 180-184
  • 13 Yildirim I, Okur E. The prevalence of nasal septal deviation in children from Kahramanmaras, Turkey. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 67 (11) 1203-1206
  • 14 Kaufman Y, Buchanan EP, Wolfswinkel EM, Weathers WM, Stal S. Cleft nasal deformity and rhinoplasty. Semin Plast Surg 2012; 26 (04) 184-190
  • 15 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62 (10) 1006-1012
  • 16 Covidence. Better systematic review management [Internet]. 2022 . Accessed January 2, 2024 at: https://www.covidence.org/
  • 17 CASP: Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP Checklists. 2022 . Accessed January 2, 2024 at: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
  • 18 Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC. et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016; 355: i4919
  • 19 Cochrane Methods. ROBINS-I tool [Internet]. 2022 . Accessed January 2, 2024 at: https://methods.cochrane.org/methods-cochrane/robins-i-tool
  • 20 D'Ascanio L, Manzini M. Quick septoplasty: surgical technique and learning curve. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33 (06) 814-818
  • 21 Bae JS, Kim ES, Jang YJ. Treatment outcomes of pediatric rhinoplasty: the Asan Medical Center experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 77 (10) 1701-1710
  • 22 Verwoerd CDA, Verwoerd-Verhoef HL. Rhinosurgery in children: basic concepts. Facial Plast Surg 2007; 23 (04) 219-230
  • 23 D'Ascanio L, Lancione C, Pompa G, Rebuffini E, Mansi N, Manzini M. Craniofacial growth in children with nasal septum deviation: a cephalometric comparative study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 74 (10) 1180-1183
  • 24 Gray LP. The development and significance of septal and dental deformity from birth to eight years. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1983; 6 (03) 265-277
  • 25 Smith MM, Ishman SL. Pediatric nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018; 51 (05) 971-985
  • 26 Walker PJ, Crysdale WS, Farkas LG. External septorhinoplasty in children: Outcome and effect on growth of septal excision and reimplantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119 (09) 984-989
  • 27 Yilmaz MS, Guven M, Akidil O, Kayabasoglu G, Demir D, Mermer H. Does septoplasty improve the quality of life in children?. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78 (08) 1274-1276
  • 28 Fuller JC, Levesque PA, Lindsay RW. Functional septorhinoplasty in the pediatric and adolescent patient. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 111: 97-102
  • 29 Ori M, Ricci G, Capalbo M. et al. Quick septoplasty in children: long-term effects on nasal breathing and dentofacial morphology. A prospective cephalometric study. Auris Nasus Larynx 2021; 48 (05) 914-921
  • 30 Can İH, Ceylan Ka, Bayiz U, Ölmez A, Samim E. Acoustic rhinometry in the objective evaluation of childhood septoplasties. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 69 (04) 445-448
  • 31 Din H, Bundogji N, Leuin SC. Psychometric evaluation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale for pediatric patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 162 (02) 248-254
  • 32 Kawai K, Dombrowski N, AuYeung T, Adil EA. Validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale in pediatric patients. Laryngoscope 2021; 131 (09) E2594-E2598
  • 33 Manteghi A, Din H, Bundogji N, Leuin SC. Pediatric septoplasty and functional septorhinoplasty: a quality of life outcome study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 111: 16-20
  • 34 Lee VS, Gold RM, Parikh SR. Short-term quality of life outcomes following pediatric septoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol 2017; 137 (03) 293-296
  • 35 Dąbrowska-Bień J, Skarżyński PH, Gwizdalska I, Łazęcka K, Skarżyński H. Complications in septoplasty based on a large group of 5639 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 275 (07) 1789-1794
  • 36 Ketcham AS, Han JK. Complications and management of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2010; 43 (04) 897-904
  • 37 Patel N, Maddalozzo J, Billings KR. An update on management of pediatric epistaxis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78 (08) 1400-1404
  • 38 Elden L, Reinders M, Witmer C. Predictors of bleeding disorders in children with epistaxis: value of preoperative tests and clinical screening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 76 (06) 767-771
  • 39 Spataro EA, Saltychev M, Kandathil CK, Most SP. Outcomes of extracorporeal septoplasty and its modifications in treatment of severe L-strut septal deviation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2019; 21 (06) 542-550
  • 40 Bishop R, Sethia R, Allen D, Elmaraghy CA. Pediatric nasal septoplasty outcomes. Transl Pediatr 2021; 10 (11) 2883-2887
  • 41 Adil E, Goyal N, Fedok FG. Corrective nasal surgery in the younger patient. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2014; 16 (03) 176-182
  • 42 Béjar I, Farkas LG, Messner AH, Crysdale WS. Nasal growth after external septoplasty in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (08) 816-821
  • 43 El-Hakim H, Crysdale WS, Abdollel M, Farkas LG. A study of anthropometric measures before and after external septoplasty in children: a preliminary study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 127 (11) 1362-1366
  • 44 Costa DB, Anselmo-Lima WT, Tamashiro E, Enoki C, Valera FCP. The impact of Metzembaum septoplasty on nasal and facial growth in children. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2013; 79 (04) 454-459
  • 45 Nolst Trenité GJ, Verwoerd CD, Verwoerd-Verhoef HL. Reimplantation of autologous septal cartilage in the growing nasal septum. I. The influence of resection and reimplantation of septal cartilage upon nasal growth: an experimental study in rabbits. Rhinology 1987; 25 (04) 225-236
  • 46 Löffler-Wirth H, Willscher E, Ahnert P. et al. Novel anthropometry based on 3D-bodyscans applied to a large population based cohort. PLoS One 2016; 11 (07) e0159887
  • 47 Tasca I, Compadretti GC. Nasal growth after pediatric septoplasty at long-term follow-up. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2011; 25 (01) e7-e12
  • 48 Dispenza F, Saraniti C, Sciandra D, Kulamarva G, Dispenza C. Management of naso-septal deformity in childhood: long-term results. Auris Nasus Larynx 2009; 36 (06) 665-670
  • 49 Pirsig W, Bean JK, Lenders H, Verwoerd CD, Verwoerd-Verhoef HL. Cartilage transformation in a composite graft of demineralized bovine bone matrix and ear perichondrium used in a child for the reconstruction of the nasal septum. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 32 (02) 171-181
  • 50 Verwoerd-Verhoef HL, Bean JK, van Osch GJ, ten Koppel PG, Meeuwis JA, Verwoerd CD. Induction in vivo of cartilage grafts for craniofacial reconstruction. Am J Rhinol 1998; 12 (01) 27-31
  • 51 Bos PK, van Osch GJ, Frenz DA, Verhaar JA, Verwoerd-Verhoef HL. Growth factor expression in cartilage wound healing: temporal and spatial immunolocalization in a rabbit auricular cartilage wound model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001; 9 (04) 382-389
  • 52 Jilani SK, Ugail H, Logan AJ. Inter-ethnic and demic-group variations in craniofacial anthropometry: a review. PPSM Biol Res 2019; 41 (01) 6-16
  • 53 Lim YC, Abdul Shakor AS, Shaharudin R. Reliability and accuracy of 2D photogrammetry: a comparison with direct measurement. Front Public Health 2022; 9: 813058
  • 54 Heymsfield SB, Bourgeois B, Ng BK, Sommer MJ, Li X, Shepherd JA. Digital anthropometry: a critical review. Eur J Clin Nutr 2018; 72 (05) 680-687
  • 55 Besner AS, Ferreira JL, Ow N. et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric surgery: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg 2022; 57 (05) 798-812