CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15(01): 170-177
DOI: 10.1055/a-2244-4478
Case Report

Family Perception of OpenNotes in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Katherine R. McCallie
1   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
2   Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, El Camino Health, Mountain View, California, United States
,
Malathi Balasundaram
1   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
2   Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, El Camino Health, Mountain View, California, United States
,
Chethan Sarabu
3   Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background OpenNotes, or sharing of medical notes via a patient portal, has been studied extensively in the adult population, but less in pediatric populations, and even more rarely in inpatient pediatric or intensive care settings.

Objectives This study aimed to understand families' interaction with and perception of inpatient hospital notes shared via patient portal in a community Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).

Methods At the end of the NICU discharge education, completed in the patient portal before discharge, families were offered an anonymous survey on OpenNotes.

Results Out of 446 NICU patients from March 16, 2022 to March 16, 2023, there were 59 respondents (13%). Race was primarily Asian (48%), and English was the predominant language (93%). Most families indicated that the notes were “very or somewhat easy to understand” (93%). Seventy-three percent of respondents felt much better about the doctor(s) after reading the notes, and 53% contacted the physicians about something in the notes. Six (16%) felt that OpenNotes were more confusing than helpful.

Conclusion To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study on NICU families' perceptions of OpenNotes, which indicated positive interactions with the doctors' daily progress notes and gave important suggestions for improvement.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, and was reviewed by El Camino Health Institutional Review Board.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 11 September 2023

Accepted: 21 December 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
12 January 2024

Article published online:
28 February 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany