Giant Meningiomas Invading the Cavernous Sinus: The “Inevitable Ones”

Abstract

Introduction Giant meningiomas invading the cavernous sinus (GMICSs) are a subgroup of challenging tumors due to their volume and the extent of neurological impairment. Preserving quality of life is one of the most relevant aspects of treating patients with GMICS.

Methods A retrospective study was conducted for surgeries performed between 2012 and 2022, including 33 patients presenting meningiomas with the largest diameter of at least 5 cm invading the cavernous sinus. The data from surgical intervention, Simpson grade of resection, tumor location, and morbimortality related to the surgeries were reviewed.

Results The group comprised 25 women and 8 men with a median age of 56 years. The mean follow-up period was 52 months. The tumors were in the sphenoid wing, anterior clinoid, spheno-orbital, spheno-petroclival, petroclival, and Meckel's cave. Simpson grade I, II, and III were obtained in 70% of cases. The meningiomas were classified as WHO grade 1 in 94%, grade 2 in 3%, and grade 3 in 3%. The overall mortality was 3%. Permanent cranial nerve deficits occurred in 21%, transient cranial nerve deficits in 42%, cerebrospinal fistula in 15%, and hemiparesis in 18%. The recurrence/regrowth rate was 6%. The Karnofsky Performance Status score of 100 and 90 was 82%.

Conclusion The surgical treatment of GMICS is an effective treatment modality with acceptable morbimortality and good long-term control. Involvement of the internal carotid artery is essential to determine the extent of resection inside the cavernous sinus, and training in the microsurgical laboratory is mandatory for safe surgical treatment.

Keywords

meningiomas - cavernous sinus - microsurgery - cranial nerves

Publication History

Received: 26 November 2023

Accepted: 19 February 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
21 February 2024

Article published online:
28 March 2024

• References

• 1 Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Gittleman H. et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012-2016. Neuro-oncol 2019; 21 (Suppl. 05) v1-v100
• 2 Radhakrishnan K, Mokri B, Parisi JE, O'Fallon WM, Sunku J, Kurland LT. The trends in incidence of primary brain tumors in the population of Rochester, Minnesota. Ann Neurol 1995; 37 (01) 67-73
• 3 DeMonte F, Smith HK, al-Mefty O. Outcome of aggressive removal of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 1994; 81 (02) 245-251
• 4 Meling TR, Da Broi M, Scheie D, Helseth E. Meningiomas: skull base versus non-skull base. Neurosurg Rev 2019; 42 (01) 163-173
• 5 da Silva CE, Zanatta C, Thibes AC, Vidaletti T. Sphenoid wing meningiomas with secondary cavernous sinus invasion: surgical results and algorithm for treatment at a single brazilian center. World Neurosurg 2022; 163: e635-e646
• 6 Dolenc VV, Skrap M, Sustersic J, Skrbec M, Morina A. A transcavernous-transsellar approach to the basilar tip aneurysms. Br J Neurosurg 1987; 1 (02) 251-259
• 7 Sekhar LN, Juric-Sekhar G, Brito da Silva H, Pridgeon JS. Skull base meningiomas: aggressive resection. Neurosurgery 2015; 62 (1, Suppl 1): 30-49
• 8 Corniola MV, Roche PH, Bruneau M. et al. Management of cavernous sinus meningiomas: consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section. Brain Spine 2022; 2: 100864
• 9 Al-Mefty O. Clinoidal meningiomas. J Neurosurg 1990; 73 (06) 840-849
• 10 Almefty R, Dunn IF, Pravdenkova S, Abolfotoh M, Al-Mefty O. True petroclival meningiomas: results of surgical management. J Neurosurg 2014; 120 (01) 40-51
• 11 da Silva CE, de Freitas PE. Large and giant skull base meningiomas: the role of radical surgical removal. Surg Neurol Int 2015; 6: 113
• 12 de Carvalho RF, de Morais ANL, Olijnyk LD, Abrao AAC, Zanatta C, da Silva CE. Spheno-orbital meningioma with cavernous sinus extension. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 83 (Suppl. 03) e611-e612
• 13 Abrão AAC, da Silva CE. Clinoidal meningioma with cavernous sinus invasion. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 83 (Suppl. 03) e613-e614
• 14 da Silva CE, Romero AdelC, de Freitas PE, Olijnyk LD. Severe edema and venous congestion following sphenoorbital meningioma resection in a meningiomatosis case: importance of predicting venous disturbances. J Neurol Surg Rep 2015; 76 (02) e239-e243
• 15 EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D–3L User Guide, 2018. Accessed February 29, 2024 at: https://euroqol.org/publications/user-guides
• 16 Simpson D. The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1957; 20 (01) 22-39
• 17 Raheja A, Couldwell WT. Cavernous sinus meningioma with orbital involvement: algorithmic decision-making and treatment strategy. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 81 (04) 348-356
• 18 Raheja A, Couldwell WT. Cavernous sinus meningioma. Handb Clin Neurol 2020; 170: 69-85
• 19 Al-Mefty O, Smith RR. Surgery of tumors invading the cavernous sinus. Surg Neurol 1988; 30 (05) 370-381
• 20 Lemée JM, Corniola MV, Da Broi M. et al. Extent of resection in meningioma: Predictive factors and clinical implications. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 5944
• 21 da Silva CE, de Freitas PEP. Surgical removal of skull base meningiomas in symptomatic elderly patients. World Neurosurg 2018; 120: e1149-e1155
• 22 da Silva CE, Peixoto de Freitas PE. Recurrence of skull base meningiomas: the role of aggressive removal in surgical treatment. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016; 77 (03) 219-225
• 23 da Silva CE, de Freitas PEP. Classification of meningiomas based on their surgical removal, World Health Organization grade, and cytogenetic profile: a treatment algorithm. World Neurosurg 2017; 105: 289-293
• 24 Vidaletti TB, Thibes AC, da Silva CE. Falcine meningioma: FEBAIR principles in a “Grade Zero” concept application - 2D operative video. Surg Neurol Int 2023; 14: 380
• 25 Valencia-Ramos C, Arroyo Del Castillo JG, Aragon JF. et al. Prognostic factors in the surgery of clinoidal meningiomas. Cureus 2023; 15 (06) e40122
• 26 Chen LH, Xia Y, Wei F, Sun K, Huang HZ, Xu RX. The factors influencing postoperative efficacy of anterior clinoidal meningioma treatment and an analysis of best-suited surgical strategies. Front Neurol 2023; 14: 1097686
• 27 He W, Liu Z, Zheng D. et al. Management of cavernous sinus meningiomas: Clinical features, treatment strategies, and long-term outcomes. Asian J Surg 2023; (e-pub ahead of print)
• 28 Wen HT, Rhoton Jr AL, de Oliveira E, Castro LH, Figueiredo EG, Teixeira MJ. Microsurgical anatomy of the temporal lobe: part 2–sylvian fissure region and its clinical application. Neurosurgery 2009; 65 (6, Suppl): 1-35 , discussion 36
• 29 Balasa A, Hurghis C, Tamas F, Chinezu R. Surgical strategies and clinical outcome of large to giant sphenoide wing meningiomas: a case series study. Brain Sci 2020; 10 (12) 957
• 30 Cushing H, Eisenhardt HC. Meningiomas. Their Classification, Regional Behaviour, Life History, and Surgical End Results. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1938
• 31 Terrier LM, Bernard F, Fournier HD. et al. Spheno-orbital meningiomas surgery: multicenter management study for complex extensive tumors. Multicenter Study. World Neurosurg 2018; 112: e145-e156
• 32 Kiyofuji S, Casabella AM, Graffeo CS, Perry A, Garrity JA, Link MJ. Sphenoorbital meningioma: a unique skull base tumor. Surgical technique and results. J Neurosurg 2019; 23: 1-8
• 33 Gonen L, Nov E, Shimony N. et al. Sphenoorbital meningioma: surgical series and design of na intraoperative management algorithm. Neurosurg Ver 2018; 41 (01) 291-301
• 34 Giammattei L, di Russo P, Starnoni D. et al. Petroclival meningiomas: update of current treatment and consensus by the EANS skull base section. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163 (06) 1639-1663
• 35 Al-Mefty O, Fox JL, Smith RR. Petrosal approach for petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1988; 22 (03) 510-517
• 36 Ribas GC, Rodrigues Jr AJ. The suprapetrosal craniotomy. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 (03) 449-454
• 37 da Silva CE, Olijnyk L, Coutinho Abrão AA. Anterior petrosal approach to petrous apex meningioma: climbing the rock-two-dimensional operative video. World Neurosurg 2022; 162: 67
• 38 Guinto G, Hernández E, Estrada E. et al. Petroclival meningiomas: a simple system that could help in selecting the approach. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 21 (04) 225-234
• 39 Wagner A, Alraun M, Kahlig V. et al. Surgical and functional outcome after resection of 64 petroclival meningiomas. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14 (18) 4517
• 40 Amelot A, van Effenterre R, Kalamarides M, Cornu P, Boch AL. Natural history of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2018; 1: 1-8
• 41 Parkinson D. A surgical approach to the cavernous portion of the carotid artery. Anatomical studies and case report. J Neurosurg 1965; 23 (05) 474-483
• 42 Heth JA, Al-Mefty O. Cavernous sinus meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 14 (06) e3
• 43 Yasuda A, Campero A, Martins C, Rhoton Jr AL, de Oliveira E, Ribas GC. Microsurgical anatomy and approaches to the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (1, Suppl): 4-27 , discussion 4–27
• 44 Krisht A, Barnett DW, Barrow DL, Bonner G. The blood supply of the intracavernous cranial nerves: an anatomic study. Neurosurgery 1994; 34 (02) 275-279 , discussion 279
• 45 Salaud C, Decante C, Ploteau S, Hamel A. Implication of the inferolateral trunk of the cavernous internal CAROTID artery in cranial nerve blood supply: anatomical study and review of the literature. Ann Anat 2019; 226: 23-28
• 46 Najera E, Ibrahim B, Muhsen BA. et al. Blood supply of cranial nerves passing through the cavernous sinus: an anatomical study and its implications for microsurgical and endoscopic cavernous sinus surgery. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 702574
• 47 Conti M, Prevedello DM, Madhok R. et al. The antero-medial triangle: the risk for cranial nerves ischemia at the cavernous sinus lateral wall. Anatomic cadaveric study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008; 110 (07) 682-686
• 48 Sindou M, Wydh E, Jouanneau E, Nebbal M, Lieutaud T. Long-term follow-up of meningiomas of the cavernous sinus after surgical treatment alone. J Neurosurg 2007; 107 (05) 937-944
• 49 Hung YC, Lee CC, Guo WY. et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas: post-treatment long-term clinical outcomes, complications, and volume changes. J Neurooncol 2019; 143 (02) 261-270
• 50 Park KJ, Kano H, Iyer A. et al. Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for cavernous sinus meningioma: long-term follow-up in 200 patients. J Neurosurg 2018; 1: 1-10
• 51 Lee CC, Trifiletti DM, Sahgal A. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for benign (World Health Organization Grade I) cavernous sinus meningiomas-International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (IRS) practice guidelines: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 2018; 83 (06) 1128-1142
• 52 Clark VE, Erson-Omay EZ, Serin A. et al. Genomic analysis of non-NF2 meningiomas reveals mutations in TRAF7, KLF4, AKT1, and SMO. Science 2013; 339 (6123): 1077-1080
• 53 Nanda A, Thakur JD, Sonig A, Missios S. Microsurgical resectability, outcomes, and tumor control in meningiomas occupying the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 2016; 125 (02) 378-392
• 54 Jakola AS, Gulati M, Gulati S, Solheim O. The influence of surgery on quality of life in patients with intracranial meningiomas: a prospective study. J Neurooncol 2012; 110 (01) 137-144
• 55 Kalkanis SN, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Buzney E, Ribaudo HJ, Black PM. Quality of life following surgery for intracranial meningiomas at Brigham and Women's Hospital: a study of 164 patients using a modification of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-brain questionnaire. J Neurooncol 2000; 48 (03) 233-241
• 56 Karsy M, Jensen MR, Guan J, Ravindra VM, Bisson EF, Couldwell WT. EQ-5D quality-of-life analysis and cost-effectiveness after skull base meningioma resection. Neurosurgery 2019; 85 (03) E543-E552
• 57 Pieper DR, Al-Mefty O, Hanada Y, Buechner D. Hyperostosis associated with meningioma of the cranial base: secondary changes or tumor invasion. Neurosurgery 1999; 44 (04) 742-746 , discussion 746–747
• 58 Adegbite AB, Khan MI, Paine KWE, Tan LK. The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurosurg 1983; 58 (01) 51-56