Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2316-7885
Bigger Calves from Doing Higher Resistance Training Volume?
Abstract
We compared the effects of different weekly calf training sets on muscle size changes. Sixty-one untrained young women performed a calf training program for 6 weeks, 3 d·wk–1, with differences in resistance training volume. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: 6-SET, 9-SET, and 12-SET weekly calf training sets. The calf raise exercise was performed in sets of 15–20 repetitions maximum. The muscle thickness measurements of medial gastrocnemius (MG), lateral gastrocnemius (LG), and soleus (SOL) were taken via B-mode ultrasound. We used the sum of the three-muscle thickness as a proxy for the triceps surae (TSSUM). The 12-SET group elicited greater increases than the 6-SET in LG (6-SET=+ 8.1% vs. 12-SET=+ 14.3%; P=0.017), SOL (6-SET=+ 6.7% vs. 12-SET=+ 12.7%; P=0.024), and TSSUM (6-SET=+ 6.9% vs. 12-SET=+ 12.0%; P=0.005), but there was no significant difference in MG changes (6-SET=+ 6.6% vs. 12-SET=+ 9.9%; P=0.067). There were no significant differences when comparing 9-SET vs. 6-SET and 12-SET (P≥0.099). Although all groups experienced calf muscle hypertrophy, our results suggest that the higher dose range may optimize triceps surae muscle size gains.
Publication History
Received: 14 August 2023
Accepted: 25 April 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
29 April 2024
Article published online:
26 June 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 American Collge of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 687-708 DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670.
- 2 Baz-Valle E, Fontes-Villalba M, Santos-Concejero J. Total number of sets as a training volume quantification method for muscle hypertrophy: a systematic review. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 35: 870-878 DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002776.
- 3 Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 2017; 35: 1073-1082 DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197.
- 4 Nunes JP, Kassiano W, Costa BDV. et al. Equating resistance‑training volume between programs focused on muscle hypertrophy. Sports Med 2021; 51: 1171-1178 DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003674.
- 5 Baz-Valle E, Balsalobre-Fernández C, Alix-Fages C. et al. A systematic review of the effects of different resistance training volumes on muscle hypertrophy. J Hum Kinet 2022; 81: 199-210 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2022-0017.
- 6 Currier BS, McLeod JC, Banfield L. et al. Resistance training prescription for muscle strength and hypertrophy in healthy adults: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2023; 57: 1211-1220 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106807.
- 7 Radaelli R, Fleck SJ, Leite T. et al. Dose-response of 1, 3, and 5 sets of resistance exercise on strength, local muscular endurance, and hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 1349-1358 DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000758.
- 8 Brigatto FA, Lima LEM, Germano MD. et al. High resistance-training volume enhances muscle thickness in resistance-trained men. J Strength Cond Res 2022; 36: 22-30 DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000003413.
- 9 Schoenfeld BJ, Contreras B, Krieger J. et al. Resistance training volume enhances muscle hypertrophy but not strength in trained men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019; 51: 94-103 DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001764.
- 10 Radaelli R, Botton CE, Wilhelm EN. et al. Time course of low- and high-volume strength training on neuromuscular adaptations and muscle quality in older women. Age (Dordr) 2014; 36: 881-892 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-013-9611-2.
- 11 Heaselgrave SR, Blacker J, Smeuninx B. et al. Dose-response relationship of weekly resistance-training volume and frequency on muscular adaptations in trained men. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2019; 14: 360-368 DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0427.
- 12 Behm DG, Whittle J, Button D. et al. Intermuscle differences in activation. Muscle Nerve 2002; 25: 236-243 DOI: 10.1002/mus.10008.
- 13 Hucteau E, Jubeau M, Cornu C. et al. Is there an intermuscular relationship in voluntary activation capacities and contractile kinetics. Eur J Appl Physiol 2020; 120: 513-526 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04299-z.
- 14 Chen TC, Lin KY, Chen HL. et al. Comparison in eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage among four limb muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 211-223 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1648-7.
- 15 Chen TC, Yang TJ, Huang MJ. et al. Damage and the repeated bout effect of arm, leg, and trunk muscles induced by eccentric resistance exercises. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2019; 29: 725-735 DOI: 10.1111/sms.13388.
- 16 Kassiano W, Costa B, Kunevaliki G. et al. Greater gastrocnemius muscle hypertrophy after partial range of motion training performed at long muscle lengths. J Strength Cond Res 2023; 37: 1746-1753 DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000004460.
- 17 Geremia JM, Baroni BM, Bini RR. et al. Triceps surae muscle architecture adaptations to eccentric training. Front Physiol 2019; 10: 1456 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01456.
- 18 Schoenfeld BJ, Vigotsky AD, Grgic J. et al. Do the anatomical and physiological properties of a muscle determine its adaptive response to different loading protocols. Physiol Rep 2020; 8: e14427 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14427.
- 19 Nuzzo JL. Narrative review of sex differences in muscle strength, endurance, activation, size, fiber type, and strength training participation rates, preferences, motivations, injuries, and neuromuscular adaptations. J Strength Cond Res 2023; 37: 494-536 DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000004329.
- 20 Hunter SK. Sex differences in fatigability of dynamic contractions. Exp Physiol 2016; 101: 250-255 DOI: 10.1113/EP085370.
- 21 Clark BC, Collier SR, Manini TM. et al. Sex differences in muscle fatigability and activation patterns of the human quadriceps femoris. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005; 94: 196-206 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-004-1293-0.
- 22 Hagstrom AD, Marshall PW, Halaki M. et al. The effect of resistance training in women on dynamic strength and muscular hypertrophy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med 2020; 50: 1075-1093 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01247-x.
- 23 Harriss DJ, Jones C, MacSween A. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2022 update. Int J Sports Med 2022; 43: 1065-1070 DOI: 10.1055/a-1957-2356.
- 24 Nunes JP, Costa BDV, Kassiano W. et al. Different foot positioning during calf training to induce portion-specific gastrocnemius muscle hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res 2020; 34: 2347-2351
- 25 Kassiano W, Costa B, Kunevaliki G. et al. Muscle swelling of the triceps surae in response to straight-leg and bent-leg calf raise exercises in young women. J Strength Cond Res 2023; 37: e438-e443 DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000004491.
- 26 Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J 1986; 292: 746-750 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746.
- 27 Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155-159 DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
- 28 Price TB, Kamen G, Damon BM. et al. Comparison of MRI with EMG to study muscle activity associated with dynamic plantar flexion. Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 21: 853-861 DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(03)00183-8.
- 29 Kinoshita M, Maeo S, Kobayashi Y. et al. Triceps surae muscle hypertrophy is greater after standing versus seated calf-raise training. Front Physiol 2023; 14: 1272106
- 30 Van Every DW, Coleman M, Rosa A. et al. Loaded inter-set stretch may selectively enhance muscular adaptations of the plantar flexors. PLoS One 2022; 17: e0273451 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273451.
- 31 Kassiano W, Costa B, Nunes JP. et al. Which ROMs lead to Rome? A systematic review of the effects of range of motion on muscle hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res 2023; 37: 1135-1144 DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000004415.
- 32 Wolf M, Androulakis-Korakakis P, Fisher J. et al. Partial vs full range of motion resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Strength Cond 2023; 3 DOI: 10.47206/ijsc.v3i1.182.
- 33 Merton PA. Voluntary strength and fatigue. J Physiol 1954; 123: 553-564 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005070.
- 34 Burd NA, Holwerda AM, Selby KC. et al. Resistance exercise volume affects myofibrillar protein synthesis and anabolic signalling molecule phosphorylation in young men. J Physiol 2010; 588: 3119-3130 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.192856.
- 35 Mitchell CJ, Churchward-Venne TA, West DW. et al. Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. J Appl Physiol 2012; 113: 71-77 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012.
- 36 Counts BR, Buckner SL, Mouser JG. et al. Muscle growth: to infinity and beyond. Muscle Nerve 2017; 56: 1022-1030 DOI: 10.1002/mus.25696.
- 37 Shiromaru FF, de Salles Painelli V, Silva-Batista C. et al. Differential muscle hypertrophy and edema responses between high-load and low-load exercise with blood flow restriction. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2019; 29: 1713-1726 DOI: 10.1111/sms.13516.
- 38 Seynnes OR, de Boer M, Narici MV. Early skeletal muscle hypertrophy and architectural changes in response to high-intensity resistance training. J Appl Physiol 2007; 102: 368-373 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00789.2006.
- 39 Héroux ME, Dakin CJ, Luu BL. et al. Absence of lateral gastrocnemius activity and differential motor unit behavior in soleus and medial gastrocnemius during standing balance. J Appl Physiol 2014; 116: 140-148 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00906.2013.
- 40 Duysens J, van Wezel BM, Prokop T. et al. Medial gastrocnemius is more activated than lateral gastrocnemius in sural nerve induced reflexes during human gait. Brain Res 1996; 727: 230-232 DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(96)00525-2.
- 41 Barcelos C, Damas F, Nobrega SR. et al. High-frequency resistance training does not promote greater muscular adaptations compared to low frequencies in young untrained men. Eur J Sport Sci 2018; 1-6 DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1476590.
- 42 Damas F, Angleri V, Phillips SM. et al. Myofibrillar protein synthesis and muscle hypertrophy individualized responses to systematically changing resistance training variables in trained young men. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2019; 127: 806-815 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00350.2019.
- 43 Aube D, Wadhi T, Rauch J. et al. Progressive resistance training volume: effects on muscle thickness, mass, and strength adaptations in resistance-trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res 2020; 36: 600-607 DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000003524.
- 44 Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF. et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c869 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c869.