Optimizing Surgical Outcomes for Skull Base Epidermoid Cysts

Abstract

Introduction Surgery for skull base epidermoid cysts (SBECs) has several inherent risks including aseptic meningitis and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) malabsorption. Perioperative measures to reduce the likelihood of such complications have not been evaluated, and this study sought to compare outcomes before and after implementation of an institutional perioperative protocol in the management of SBECs.

Methods Review of a prospective database of surgically managed SBECs. Outcomes were compared before (2003–2008) and after (2010–2021) implementation of a perioperative protocol including intraoperative hyper-irrigation, prolonged course of postoperative steroids, and aggressive management of CSF malabsorption.

Results A total of 39 patients were included: 12 before and 27 after implementation of the protocol. The groups were similar with respect to mean age (p = 0.99), gender (p = 0.29), surgical approach—most commonly retrosigmoid (p > 0.99)—and extent of resection—most commonly total or near total (p = 0.64). The post-protocol implementation group had a significantly lower rate of CSF diversion (p = 0.04). The overall rates of hydrocephalus (7 vs. 30%), CSF leak (19 vs. 33%), bacterial meningitis (15 vs. 33%), and mean length of stay (12 vs. 49 days) were lower in the post-implementation group, although differences did not reach statistical significance. Rates of aseptic meningitis and cranial nerve palsies were similar.

Conclusion Our additional perioperative measures resulted in more favorable CSF dynamics with reduced need for CSF diversion and secondary consequences such as wound leaks and infective meningitis.

Keywords

epidermoid cysts - steroids - dexamethasone - irrigation - posterior fossa

Authors' Contributions

Data collection was conducted by M.W., A.S., J.B., and O.N.P. The data analysis involved M.W., A.S., O.N.P., S.A.R., A.T.K., and C.H.-W. The first draft was written by M.W., A.S., J.B., and O.N.P., while the final draft received approval from all authors.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 01. März 2024

Angenommen: 06. Oktober 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
08. Oktober 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
07. November 2024

• References

• 1 Yawn RJ, Patel NS, Driscoll CL. et al. Primary epidermoid tumors of the cerebellopontine angle: a review of 47 cases. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (07) 951-955
• 2 Hasegawa M, Nouri M, Nagahisa S. et al. Cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cysts: clinical presentations and surgical outcome. Neurosurg Rev 2016; 39 (02) 259-266 , discussion 266–267
• 3 Aboud E, Abolfotoh M, Pravdenkova S, Gokoglu A, Gokden M, Al-Mefty O. Giant intracranial epidermoids: is total removal feasible?. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (04) 743-756
• 4 Fu JB, Nelson MB, Bruera E. Inpatient rehabilitation of cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cysts: report of 3 cases. Neurosurg Q 2014; 24 (03) 197-202
• 5 Gopalakrishnan CV, Ansari KA, Nair S, Menon G. Long term outcome in surgically treated posterior fossa epidermoids. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014; 117: 93-99
• 6 Czernicki T, Kunert P, Nowak A, Wojciechowski J, Marchel A. Epidermoid cysts of the cerebellopontine angle: clinical features and treatment outcomes. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2016; 50 (02) 75-82
• 7 Kapoor JR, Kapoor R, Buzea C, Gropper MR. Spinal epidermoid tumors: novel approach to aseptic meningitis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16 (02) 193-194
• 8 Lynch JC, Aversa A, Pereira C, Nogueira J, Gonçalves M, Lopes H. Surgical strategy for intracranial dermoid and epidermoid tumors: an experience with 33 Patients. Surg Neurol Int 2014; 5: 163
• 9 Yaşargil MG, Abernathey CD, Sarioglu AC. Microneurosurgical treatment of intracranial dermoid and epidermoid tumors. Neurosurgery 1989; 24 (04) 561-567
• 10 Samii M, Tatagiba M, Piquer J, Carvalho GA. Surgical treatment of epidermoid cysts of the cerebellopontine angle. J Neurosurg 1996; 84 (01) 14-19
• 11 Berger MS, Wilson CB. Epidermoid cysts of the posterior fossa. J Neurosurg 1985; 62 (02) 214-219
• 12 Singh R, Prasad RS, Singh A. Evaluation of cerebellopontine angle epidermoid presenting with cranial nerve deficit: a surgical perspective. Asian J Neurosurg 2020; 15 (03) 573-578
• 13 Farhoud A, Khedr W, Aboul-Enein H. Surgical resection of cerebellopontine epidermoid cysts: limitations and outcome. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79 (02) 167-172
• 14 Rehman L, Bokhari I, Siddiqi SU, Bagga V, Hussain MM. Intracranial epidermoid lesions: our experience of 38 cases. Turk Neurosurg 2017; 28 (05) 763-767
• 15 Safavi-Abbasi S, Di Rocco F, Bambakidis N. et al. Has management of epidermoid tumors of the cerebellopontine angle improved? A surgical synopsis of the past and present. Skull Base 2008; 18 (02) 85-98
• 16 Schiefer TK, Link MJ. Epidermoids of the cerebellopontine angle: a 20-year experience. Surg Neurol 2008; 70 (06) 584-590 , discussion 590
• 17 Talacchi A, Sala F, Alessandrini F, Turazzi S, Bricolo A. Assessment and surgical management of posterior fossa epidermoid tumors: report of 28 cases. Neurosurgery 1998; 42 (02) 242-251 , discussion 251–252
• 18 Mohanty A, Venkatrama SK, Rao BR, Chandramouli BA, Jayakumar PN, Das BS. Experience with cerebellopontine angle epidermoids. Neurosurgery 1997; 40 (01) 24-29 , discussion 29–30
• 19 Chatterjee S, Chatterjee U. Overview of post-infective hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 2011; 27 (10) 1693-1698
• 20 Wall RJ, Dittus RS, Ely EW. Protocol-driven care in the intensive care unit: a tool for quality. Crit Care 2001; 5 (06) 283-285