Psychiatrische Praxis, Table of Contents Psychiatr Prax 2025; 52(02): 66-67DOI: 10.1055/a-2515-5595 Debatte: Pro & Kontra Psychiatrische Vorsorgedokumente – schafft Digitalisierung die erhoffte Akzeptanz? – Pro Julian Schwarz Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article Full Text References Literatur 1 Stephenson L, Gieselmann A, Gergel T. et al. Self-binding directives in psychiatric practice: a systematic review of reasons. Lancet Psychiatry 2023; 10: 887-895 2 Steinert T, Hirsch S. S3-Leitlinie Verhinderung von Zwang: Prävention und Therapie aggressiven Verhaltens bei Erwachsenen. Der Nervenarzt 2019; 91: 611-616 3 Schwarz J, Meier-Diedrich E, Scholten M. et al. Integration of Psychiatric advance directives into the patient-accessible electronic health record: Exploring the promise and limitations (preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27 4 Gill RK, Droney J, Owen G. et al. Digital advance care planning with severe mental illness: a retrospective observational cohort analysis of the use of an electronic palliative care coordination system. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23: 56 5 Thalamos and King’s College London. Digital Advance Choice Documents Deploying in a clinical setting. 2023; Im Internet: https://www.mentalcapacitylawandpolicy.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Thalamos_KCL_Digital-ACD_Discovery_Document.pdf; Stand: 16.07.2024 6 Redahan M, Kelly BD. Artificial intelligence and mental capacity legislation: Opening Pandora’s modem. Int J Law Psychiatry 2024; 94: 101985