Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Appl Clin Inform 2025; 16(03): 507-515
DOI: 10.1055/a-2524-4993
Research Article

Association of an HIV-Prediction Model with Uptake of Preexposure Prophylaxis

Steven Romero
1   Department of Pharmacy, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas TX and Parkland Health, Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Kristin S. Alvarez
2   Center of Innovation and Value at Parkland, Parkland Health, Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Ank E. Nijhawan
3   Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas TX and Parkland Health, Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Arun Nethi
4   Parkland Center for Clinical Innovation, Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Katie Bistransin
5   Department of Pharmacy, Parkland Health, Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Helen L. King
3   Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas TX and Parkland Health, Dallas, Texas, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding A.E.N. and H.L.K. received research funds from Gilead Sciences.
› Further Information
Also available at
  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background

Global efforts aimed at ending human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence have adapted and evolved since the turn of the century. The utilization of machine learning incorporated into an electronic health record (EHR) can be refined into prediction models that identify when an individual is at greater HIV infection risk. This can create a novel and innovative approach to identifying patients eligible for preventative therapy.

Objectives

This study's aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an HIV prediction model in clinical workflows. Outcomes included preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prescriptions generated and the model's ability to identify eligible patients.

Methods

A prediction model was developed and implemented at the safety-net hospital in Dallas County. Patients seen in primary care clinics were evaluated between July 2020 and June 2022. The prediction model was incorporated into an existing best practice advisory (BPA) used to identify potentially eligible PrEP patients. The prior, basic BPA (bBPA) displayed if a prior sexually transmitted infection was documented, and the enhanced BPA (eBPA) incorporated the HIV prediction model.

Results

A total of 3,218 unique patients received the BPA during the study time period, with 2,346 ultimately included for evaluation. There were 678 patients in the bBPA group and 1,666 in the eBPA group. PrEP prescriptions generated increased in the postimplementation group within the 90-day follow-up period (bBPA:1.48 vs. eBPA:3.67 prescriptions per month, p < 0.001). Patient demographics also differed between groups, resulting in a higher median age (bBPA: 36[interquartile range (IQR): 24] vs. eBPA: 52[QR: 19] years, p < 0.001) and an even distribution between birth sex in the postimplementation group (female sex at birth bBPA: 62.2% vs. eBPA:50.2%, p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

The implementation of an HIV prediction model yielded a higher number of PrEP prescriptions generated and was associated with the identification of twice the number of potentially eligible patients.

Keywords

machine learning - human immunodeficiency virus - preexposure prophylaxis - decision support systems

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This study was conducted in compliance with the University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB): Human Research Protection Program (HRPP).




Publication History

Received: 16 July 2024

Accepted: 29 December 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
24 January 2025

Article published online:
04 June 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Surveillance Reports HIV. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed February 2, 2024 at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html
    PubMed
  • 2 Fast-Track strategy to end the AIDS epidemic by 2030. UNAIDS. . Accessed April 1, 2023 at: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/campaigns/World-AIDS-Day-Report-2014
    PubMed
  • 3 About Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S. Initiative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed April 1, 2023 at: https://www.cdc.gov/endhiv/about.html
    PubMed
  • 4 Local Data. AIDSVu. Accessed April 1, 2023 at: https://aidsvu.org/local-data/#/
    PubMed
  • 5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. US Public Health Service: Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States—2021 Update: a clinical practice guideline. Accessed 2021 at: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/prep/cdc-hiv-prep-guidelines-2021.pdf
    PubMed
  • 6 Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH. et al. US Preventive Services Task Force. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 2019; 321 (22) 2203-2213
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Petroll AE, Walsh JL, Owczarzak JL, McAuliffe TL, Bogart LM, Kelly JA. PrEP awareness, familiarity, comfort, and prescribing experience among US primary care providers and HIV specialists. AIDS Behav 2017; 21 (05) 1256-1267
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Storholm ED, Ober AJ, Mizel ML. et al. Primary care providers' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): informing network-based interventions. AIDS Educ Prev 2021; 33 (04) 325-344
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Pleuhs B, Quinn KG, Walsh JL, Petroll AE, John SA. Health care provider barriers to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in the United States: a systematic review. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2020; 34 (03) 111-123
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Chan CT, Carlson J, Lee T, Vo M, Nasr A, Hart-Cooper G. Usability and utility of human immunodeficiency virus pre-exposure prophylaxis clinical decision support to increase knowledge and pre-exposure prophylaxis initiations among pediatric providers. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (05) 1141-1150
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Cho H, Iribarren S, Schnall R. Technology-mediated interventions and quality of life for persons living with HIV/AIDS. A systematic review. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (02) 348-368
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Krakower DS, Gruber S, Hsu K. et al. Development and validation of an automated HIV prediction algorithm to identify candidates for pre-exposure prophylaxis: a modelling study. Lancet HIV 2019; 6 (10) e696-e704
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Marcus JL, Hurley LB, Krakower DS, Alexeeff S, Silverberg MJ, Volk JE. Use of electronic health record data and machine learning to identify candidates for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a modelling study. Lancet HIV 2019; 6 (10) e688-e695
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Nethi AK, Karam AG, Alvarez KS. et al. Using machine learning to identify patients at risk of acquiring HIV in an urban health system. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2024; 97 (01) 40-47
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Friedman EE, Shankaran S, Devlin SA. et al. Development of a predictive model for identifying women vulnerable to HIV in Chicago. BMC Womens Health 2023; 23 (01) 313
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Burns CM, Pung L, Witt D. et al. Development of a human immunodeficiency virus risk prediction model using electronic health record data from an academic health system in the Southern United States. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76 (02) 299-306
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Krakower DS, Lieberman M, Marino M. et al. Implementing an automated prediction model to improve prescribing of HIV preexposure prophylaxis. NEJM Catal 2023; 4 (11) CAT-23
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Volk JE, Leyden WA, Lea AN. et al. Using electronic health records to improve HIV preexposure prophylaxis care: a randomized trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2024; 95 (04) 362-369
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Parkland Health. Parkland Health Annual Report. Accessed April 1, 2024 at: https://guides.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/AMA/websites
    PubMed
  • 20 King HL, Park E, Blanchard H, Alvarez KS, Harms M, Broker P. Implementation of sexual health curriculum series: educational initiative to increase STI screening and treatment in Dallas, Texas. J Community Health 2023; 48 (05) 793-797
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Smit M, Jordans CCE, Reinhard JM. et al. Clinical decision support systems to guide healthcare providers on HIV testing. AIDS 2022; 36 (08) 1083-1093
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Tekeste M, Hull S, Dovidio JF. et al. Differences in medical mistrust between Black and White women: implications for patient-provider communication about PrEP. AIDS Behav 2019; 23 (07) 1737-1748
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Hull SJ, Duan X, Brant AR. et al. Understanding psychosocial determinants of PrEP uptake among cisgender women experiencing heightened HIV risk: implications for multi-level communication intervention. Health Commun 2023; 38 (14) 3264-3275
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Stewart J, Ruiz-Mercado G, Sperring H, Pierre CM, Assoumou SA, Taylor JL. Addressing unmet PrEP needs in women: impact of a laboratory-driven protocol at an urban, essential hospital. Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11 (03) ofae056
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Moja L, Kwag KH, Lytras T. et al. Effectiveness of computerized decision support systems linked to electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 2014; 104 (12) e12-e22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Backman R, Bayliss S, Moore D, Litchfield I. Clinical reminder alert fatigue in healthcare: a systematic literature review protocol using qualitative evidence. Syst Rev 2017; 6 (01) 255
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Poly TN, Islam MM, Muhtar MS, Yang HC, Nguyen PAA, Li YJ. Machine learning approach to reduce alert fatigue using a disease medication-related clinical decision support system: model development and validation. JMIR Med Inform 2020; 8 (11) e19489
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar