Download PDF
J Knee Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2542-7427
Special Focus Section

Internet-Based Patient Portals Increase Patient Connectivity Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

James P. Henry 
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Huntington Hospital, Northwell Health, Huntington, New York
,
Pierre Tamer
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
,
Giles R. Suderi
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Many healthcare-related processes have undergone substantial transformation by the internet since the turn of the century. This technological revolution has fostered a fundamental shift from medical paternalism to patient autonomy and empowerment via a “patient-centric approach.” Patient portals, or internet-enabled access to an electronic medical record, permit patients to access, manage, and share their health-related information. Patient connectivity following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has the potential to positively influence overall outcomes, patient experience, and satisfaction. To understand current trends in patient portal usage, modalities of connectivity, and the implications following TKA. A systematic literature review was performed by searching PubMed and Google Scholar. Articles specific to portal usage and connectivity after TKA or total joint arthroplasty were subsequently identified for further review. Patient portals and internet-based digital connectivity platforms enable physicians, team members, and patients to communicate in the perioperative period both directly and indirectly. Communication can be through web-based patient portals, messaging services/apps, preprogrammed alerts (e.g., mobile applications or wearable devices), audio mediums, or videoconferencing. The spectrum and utilization of available patient engagement platforms continues to expand as the importance and implications of patient engagement and connectivity continue to be elucidated. Connectivity through patient portals or other mediums will continue to have an expanding role in all aspects of orthopedic surgery, patient care, and engagement. This includes preoperative education, postoperative rehabilitation, patient care, and, perhaps most importantly, collection of outcome measures. The level of evidence is V (expert opinion).

Keywords

arthroplasty - total knee arthroplasty - patient connectivity - patient portals - digital divide


Publication History

Received: 05 January 2025

Accepted: 19 February 2025

Article published online:
01 April 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 National Research Council (US) Committee on Enhancing the Internet for Health Applications. Technical Requirements and Implementation Strategies. Networking Health: Prescriptions for the Internet. 2nd ed.. National Academies Press (US); 2000.
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Dendere R, Slade C, Burton-Jones A, Sullivan C, Staib A, Janda M. Patient portals facilitating engagement with inpatient electronic medical records: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (04) e12779
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Plate JF, Ryan SP, Bergen MA, Hong CS, Attarian DE, Seyler TM. Utilization of an electronic patient portal following total joint arthroplasty does not decrease readmissions. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (02) 211-214
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Edgman-Levitan S, Schoenbaum SC. Patient-centered care: achieving higher quality by designing care through the patient's eyes. Isr J Health Policy Res 2021; 10 (01) 21
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Yu C, Xian Y, Jing T. et al. More patient-centered care, better healthcare: the association between patient-centered care and healthcare outcomes in inpatients. Front Public Health 2023; 11: 1148277
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Swoboda CM, DePuccio MJ, Fareed N, McAlearney AS, Walker DM. Patient portals: useful for whom and for what? a cross-sectional analysis of national survey data. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (03) 573-581
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Carini E, Villani L, Pezzullo AM. et al. The impact of digital patient portals on health outcomes, system efficiency, and patient attitudes: updated systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23 (09) e26189
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Kruse CS, Bolton K, Freriks G. The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (02) e44
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Griffin A, Skinner A, Thornhill J, Weinberger M. Patient portals: who uses them? What features do they use? And do they reduce hospital readmissions?. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (02) 489-501
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Milliren CE, Lindsay B, Biernat L, Smith TA, Weaver B. Can digital engagement improve outcomes for total joint replacements?. Digit Health 2022; 8: 20 552076221095322
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Klonoff DC, Shang T, Zhang JY, Cengiz E, Mehta C, Kerr D. Digital connectivity: the sixth vital sign. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 16 (05) 1303-1308
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Hägglund M, McMillan B, Whittaker R, Blease C. Patient empowerment through online access to health records. BMJ 2022; 378: e071531
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Alokozai A, Bernstein DN, Samuel LT, Kamath AF. Patient engagement approaches in total joint arthroplasty: a review of two decades. J Patient Exp 2021 ;8:23743735211036525
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Pritwani S, Shrivastava P, Pandey S. et al. Mobile and computer-based applications for rehabilitation monitoring and self-management after knee arthroplasty: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024; 12: e47843
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Campbell K, Louie P, Levine B, Gililland J. Using patient engagement platforms in the postoperative management of patients. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2020; 13 (04) 479-484
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Bombard Y, Baker GR, Orlando E. et al. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2018; 13 (01) 98
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Papadopoulos P, Soflano M, Connolly T. A digital health intervention platform (active and independent management system) to enhance the rehabilitation experience for orthopedic joint replacement patients: usability evaluation study. JMIR Hum Factors 2024; 11: e50430
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Hoang V, Parekh A, Sagers K. et al. Patient utilization of online information and its influence on orthopedic surgeon selection: cross-sectional survey of patient beliefs and behaviors. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6 (01) e22586
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Węgierek P. The impact of online health information on patient health behaviours and making decisions concerning health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17 (03) 880
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Koenig S, Nadarajah V, Smuda MP, Meredith S, Packer JD, Henn III RF. Patients' use and perception of internet-based orthopaedic sports medicine resources. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6 (09) 2325967118796469
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Londhe SB, Shah RV, Agrawal PO, Toor RJ, Londhe SS, Parkhe M. The influence of the internet on the patients' choice of surgeon for their total knee replacement surgery. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 17: 186-190
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Shen TS, Driscoll DA, Islam W, Bovonratwet P, Haas SB, Su EP. Modern internet search analytics and total joint arthroplasty: what are patients asking and reading online?. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36 (04) 1224-1231
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Greif DN, Shah HA, Luxenburg D. et al. Word of mouth and online reviews are more influential than social media for patients when selecting a sports medicine physician. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2022; 4 (03) e1185-e1191
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Deliberato RO, Rocha LL, Lima AH. et al. Physician satisfaction with a multi-platform digital scheduling system. PLoS One 2017; 12 (03) e0174127
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 North F, Buss R, Nelson EM. et al. Self-scheduling medical visits in a multispecialty, multisite medical practice: complexity, challenges, and successes. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol 2024 ;11:23333928241253126
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Kachooei A, Plusch K, Kasper A, D'Amore T, Beredjiklian P. The effect of outpatient web-based online scheduling versus traditional staff scheduling systems on progression to surgery and no-show rates. J Res Med Sci 2023; 28: 23
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Zhang S, Liau ZQG, Tan KLM, Chua WL. Evaluating the accuracy and relevance of ChatGPT responses to frequently asked questions regarding total knee replacement. Knee Surg Relat Res 2024; 36 (01) 15
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Taylor IV WL, Cheng R, Weinblatt AI, Bergstein V, Long WJ. An artificial intelligence chatbot is an accurate and useful online patient resource prior to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39 (8S1): S358-S362
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Crijns TJ. CORR insights: what are the implications of excessive internet searches for medical information by orthopaedic patients?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477 (12) 2674-2676
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Galbraith AS, McGloughlin E, Cashman J. Enhanced recovery protocols in total joint arthroplasty: a review of the literature and their implementation. Ir J Med Sci 2018; 187 (01) 97-109
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Johns WL, Layon D, Golladay GJ, Kates SL, Scott M, Patel NK. Preoperative risk factor screening protocols in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (11) 3353-3363
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Changjun C, Jingkun L, Yun Y. et al. Enhanced recovery after total joint arthroplasty (TJA): a contemporary systematic review of clinical outcomes and usage of key elements. Orthop Surg 2023; 15 (05) 1228-1240
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Anderson AM, McHugh GA, Comer C. et al. Supporting patients to prepare for total knee replacement: evidence-, theory- and person-based development of a 'Virtual Knee School' digital intervention. Health Expect 2023; 26 (06) 2549-2570
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Mason JB. The new demands by patients in the modern era of total joint arthroplasty: a point of view. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (01) 146-152
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Davaris MT, Dowsey MM, Bunzli S, Choong PF. Arthroplasty information on the internet: quality or quantity?. Bone Jt Open 2020; 1 (04) 64-73
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Chang KC, Hershfeld BE, White PB, Cohn RM, Mont MA, Bitterman AD. Knee'd to know basis: informed consent in total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39 (01) 1-5
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Pitaro NL, Barbera JP, Ranson WA. et al. Evaluating resource utilization for in-person and virtual joint classes in total joint arthroplasty: an analysis of attendance patterns at a large metropolitan health system. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37 (09) 1708-1714
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Stenquist DS, Ready LV, Ghazinouri R, Beagan C, Wisdom A, Katz JN. Development of patient education materials for total joint replacement during an international surgical brigade. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2020; 4 (10) e20.00074
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Soeters R, White PB, Murray-Weir M, Koltsov JCB, Alexiades MM, Ranawat AS. Hip and Knee Surgeons Writing Committee. Preoperative physical therapy education reduces time to meet functional milestones after total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476 (01) 40-48
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Fusco F, Turchetti G. Telerehabilitation after total knee replacement in Italy: cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a mixed telerehabilitation-standard rehabilitation programme compared with usual care. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (05) e009964
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Wang Q, Lee RLT, Hunter S, Chan SWC. The effectiveness of internet-based telerehabilitation among patients after total joint arthroplasty: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud 2021; 115: 103845
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Tsang MP, Man GCW, Xin H, Chong YC, Ong MTY, Yung PSH. The effectiveness of telerehabilitation in patients after total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Telemed Telecare 2024; 30 (05) 795-808
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Wang Q, Lee RLT, Hunter S, Chan SWC. The effectiveness of internet-based telerehabilitation among patients after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Telemed Telecare 2023; 29 (04) 247-260
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Tousignant M, Moffet H, Nadeau S. et al. Cost analysis of in-home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (03) e83
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Lebleu J, Pauwels A, Anract P, Parratte S, Van Overschelde P, Van Onsem S. Digital rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty: a multi-center prospective longitudinal cohort study. J Pers Med 2023; 13 (05) 824
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Rainey JP, Treu EA, Campbell KJ. et al. Conversational engagement using a short message service chatbot after total joint arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 2024; 30: 101484
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Rosner BI, Gottlieb M, Anderson WN. Effectiveness of an automated digital remote guidance and telemonitoring platform on costs, readmissions, and complications after hip and knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (04) 988-996.e4
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Sumargono E, Anastasia M, Saleh I, Kholinne E. The role of virtual clinics in postoperative total knee replacement surgery follow-up during COVID-19 pandemic. Adv Orthop 2022; 2022: 9558511
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Jayakumar P, Di J, Fu J. et al. A patient-focused technology-enabled program improves outcomes in primary total hip and knee replacement surgery. JBJS Open Access 2017; 2 (03) e0023
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Jensen LWH, Rahbek O, Lauritsen REK, Kold S, Dinesen B. Patient perspectives on communication pathways after orthopedic surgery and discharge and evaluation of team-based digital communication: qualitative exploratory study. JMIR Hum Factors 2024; 11: e49696
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Campbell KJ, Louie PK, Bohl DD. et al. A novel, automated text-messaging system is effective in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101 (02) 145-151
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Blasco JM, Díaz-Díaz B, Igual-Camacho C, Pérez-Maletzki J, Hernández-Guilén D, Roig-Casasús S. Effectiveness of using a chatbot to promote adherence to home physiotherapy after total knee replacement, rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24 (01) 491
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Zhang J, Dushaj K, Rasquinha VJ, Scuderi GR, Hepinstall MS. Monitoring surgical incision sites in orthopedic patients using an online physician-patient messaging platform. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (09) 1897-1900
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Constantinescu D, Pavlis W, Rizzo M, Vanden Berge D, Barnhill S, Hernandez VH. The role of commercially available smartphone apps and wearable devices in monitoring patients after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2022; 7 (07) 481-490
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Alvarez PM, McKeon JF, Spitzer AI. et al. Socioeconomic factors affecting outcomes in total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review on healthcare disparities. Arthroplasty 2022; 4 (01) 36
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Han HR, Gleason KT, Sun CA. et al. Using patient portals to improve patient outcomes: systematic review. JMIR Hum Factors 2019; 6 (04) e15038
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Ferguson K, Fraser M, Tuna M, Bruntz C, Dahrouge S. The impact of an electronic portal on patient encounters in primary care: interrupted time-series analysis. JMIR Med Inform 2023; 11: e43567
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Varady NH, d'Amonville S, Chen AF. Electronic patient portal use in orthopaedic surgery is associated with disparities, improved satisfaction, and lower no-show rates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102 (15) 1336-1343
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Bhashyam AR, Bansal M, McGovern MM, van der Vliet QMJ, Heng M. In-hospital enrollment into an electronic patient portal results in improved follow-up after orthopedic surgery: cluster randomized controlled trial. JMIR Perioper Med 2022; 5 (01) e37148
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Kolodychuk NL, Wong M, Chimento G, Adams T, Gastanaduy M, Waddell BS. Web-based patient portal access in an orthopedic adult reconstruction patient population. Arthroplast Today 2019; 5 (01) 83-87
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Bell K, Warnick E, Nicholson K. et al. Patient adoption and utilization of a web-based and mobile-based portal for collecting outcomes after elective orthopedic surgery. Am J Med Qual 2018; 33 (06) 649-656
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Pasqualini I, Piuzzi NS. New CMS policy on the mandatory collection of patient-reported outcome measures for total hip and knee arthroplasty by 2027: what orthopaedic surgeons should know. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2024; 106 (13) 1233-1241
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Sutton RM, Baker CM, D'Amore T, Courtney PM, Krueger CA, Austin MS. Poor patient compliance limits the attainability of patient-reported outcome measure completion thresholds for the comprehensive care for joint arthroplasty model. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38 (7, suppl 2) S63-S68
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Plate JF, Deen JT, Deans CF, Pour AE, Yates AJ, Sterling RS. Implementation of the new Medicare-mandated patient-reported outcomes after joint arthroplasty performance measure. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39 (05) 1136-1139
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Deans CF, Abdeen AR, Ricciardi BF, Deen JT, Schabel KL, Sterling RS. New CMS merit-based incentive payment system value pathway after total knee and hip arthroplasty: preparing for mandatory reporting. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39 (05) 1131-1135
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Graetz I, Gordon N, Fung V, Hamity C, Reed ME. The digital divide and patient portals: internet access explained differences in patient portal use for secure messaging by age, race, and income. Med Care 2016; 54 (08) 772-779
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 El-Toukhy S, Méndez A, Collins S, Pérez-Stable EJ. Barriers to patient portal access and use: evidence from the Health Information National Trends Survey. J Am Board Fam Med 2020; 33 (06) 953-968
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Otokiti A, Williams KS, Warsame L. Impact of digital divide on the adoption of online patient portals for self-motivated patients. Healthc Inform Res 2020; 26 (03) 220-228
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar