Int J Sports Med 2025; 46(10): 710-741
DOI: 10.1055/a-2591-6995
Review

Physiological, Physical and Technical Demands During Sided Soccer Game Formats: a Review

1   Escola Superior de Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Melgaco, Portugal
2   Department of Biomechanics and Sport Engineering, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland
3   None, Sport Physical Activity and Health Research & Innovation Center, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
,
4   Faculty of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Rui Silva
3   None, Sport Physical Activity and Health Research & Innovation Center, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
5   Escola Superior de Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
,
Robert Trybulski
6   Medical Department, Wojciech Korfanty Upper Silesian Academy, Katowice, Poland
7   None, Provita Żory Medical Center, Żory, Poland
,
Javier Sánchez-Sánchez
8   Faculty of Education, Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
,
9   Faculty of Physical Activity and Sports Science, University of León, Leon, Spain
10   VALFIS Research Group, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Leon, Spain
,
11   School of Health and Sports Science, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
José Afonso
12   Centre of Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, FADEUP, Porto, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the acute physiological, physical, and technical demands in soccer players during different sided game formats (1v1 to 10v10). This review included studies on soccer players with a competitive or developmental level, focusing on games with at least one comparison of sided formats. Outcomes assessed included physiological parameters (e.g., heart rate and blood lactate levels), physical demands (e.g., distance and accelerations), and technical actions (e.g., passes). The risk of bias assessment tool for nonrandomized studies of interventions (RoBANS 2) and (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) were used to evaluate the risk of bias and the certainty of evidence. The search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 2,545 records, of which 72 studies were included. Meta-analyses found that 2v2 and 3v3 formats were more physiologically intense, showing higher perceived exertion and blood lactate levels, with 3v3 also having higher heart rates. The 4v4 and 3v3 formats resulted in greater physical demands compared to the 2v2 format, with increased distances covered at various speeds, although differences were minimal beyond the 4v4 format. Smaller formats promoted ball possession, while the 3v3 format resulted in more successful shots, dribbles, and passes. In conclusion, small-sided games (< 3v3) were more physiologically demanding, mid-sized formats (> 4v4) increased locomotor demands, and smaller formats improved technical skills, although the findings should be interpreted cautiously due to study limitations.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 12 March 2025

Accepted: 18 April 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
18 April 2025

Article published online:
26 May 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany