Int J Sports Med
DOI: 10.1055/a-2610-3370
Orthopedics & Biomechanics

Evaluation of lifting techniques using optoelectronic systems with knee ROM restrictions

1   Neuroscience, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9311)
,
Valerio Barbari
1   Neuroscience, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9311)
,
2   Department Human Neurosciences, Sapienza, University of Rome La Sapienza, Roma, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9311)
,
Francesca Nardello
3   Neuroscience, Biomedical and Movement Sciences, university of Verona, Verona, Italy
,
4   Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
5   Corso di Laurea in Scienze Motorie, University of Udine, Gemona del Friuli (Udine), Italy
,
Aldo Scafoglieri
6   Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Campus Oefenplein-Etterbeek, Brussels, Belgium (Ringgold ID: RIN70493)
,
Erik Cattrysse
6   Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Campus Oefenplein-Etterbeek, Brussels, Belgium (Ringgold ID: RIN70493)
› Author Affiliations

This study explored the effect of knee ROM restrictions on lumbar spine kinematics and posterior chain muscle activity during squat and stoop lifting tasks. This relationship reflects the concept of regional interdependence, where impairments in one anatomical area may influence others, a key principle in kinetic chain approach. Fifteen healthy adults performed squat and stoop lifting tasks under three knee range of motion (ROM) conditions (squat: free/0-60°/0-90°; stoop: free/0°/0-30°) using optoelectronic motion capture and electromyographic (EMG) systems. ANOVA one-way was applied to analyze lumbar spine angles in flexion/extension, side bending and rotation, and to assess muscle activation patterns for five posterior chain muscles. No significant effects of knee ROM restrictions were observed for lumbar flexion/extension or side bending (p > 0.15), but pelvic rotation differed significantly (p = 0.0103). EMG analysis showed increased activation of the Gastrocnemius Lateralis and Biceps Femoris (p < 0.001), while Gluteus Maximus and Latissimus Dorsi activation remained unchanged. Knee ROM restrictions influenced EMG muscle activation in distal posterior chain muscles and altered pelvic rotation, suggesting localized compensatory mechanisms. Results highlight the variation in muscle activation patterns and kinetic adjustments during squat and stoop lifting tasks in healthy individuals simulating knee ROM deficits, osteoarthritis, or low back pain conditions.



Publication History

Received: 17 February 2025

Accepted after revision: 14 May 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
14 May 2025

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany