CC BY 4.0 · TH Open 2025; 09: a26219749
DOI: 10.1055/a-2621-9749
Original Research

Prospective, Observational Study of the Clinical Outcomes of FVIII Treatment in Adults and Adolescents with Severe Haemophilia A

Pratima Chowdary
1   Katharine Dormandy Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
2   Department of Haematology, Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Liane Khoo
3   Haemophilia Treatment Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
,
Michael Wang
4   Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Colorado, United States
,
Hervé Chambost
5   AP-HM, Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Children Hospital La Timone & Aix Marseille University, INSERM, INRA, C2VN, Marseille, France
,
Anthony K.C. Chan
6   Department of Pediatrics, McMaster Children's Hospital, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
,
Annemieke Willemze
7   Sanofi, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Johannes Oldenburg
8   Institute of Experimental Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
› Institutsangaben

Funding This study was funded by Sanofi and Sobi. Medical writing support was funded by Sanofi and Sobi. All authors had access to the primary clinical data and approved the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Abstract

Objective

To assess real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in previously treated patients ≥12 years old with severe haemophilia A treated with marketed factor VIII (FVIII) replacement products.

Methods

Data were collected prospectively between 25 January 2019 and 30 November 2020 across 45 sites in 17 countries. Primary endpoint was annualized bleed rate (ABR). Secondary endpoints included factor consumption, bleed treatment, joint health, and safety. Exploratory endpoints included pain and quality of life outcomes.

Results

A total of 157 patients received ≥1 FVIII injection (prophylaxis n = 139, on-demand n = 19). Mean (standard deviation; SD) observation period was 43.1 (13.3) weeks. Median (quarter [Q]1, Q3) ABR was 2.0 (0.0, 5.7) for those on prophylaxis. Those receiving standard half-life FVIII products or extended half-life FVIII products had a median (IQR) ABR of 2.2 (0.0, 6.1) and 1.3 (0.0, 5.0), respectively. Still, only 35% of patients on prophylaxis experienced zero bleeds and 18% had five or more bleeds in a year. Approximately 23% of bleeding episodes required >1 FVIII dose for resolution. The mean (SD) number of routine prophylaxis injections/week was 2.2 (1.1). Median (Q1, Q3) annualized factor consumption for patients on prophylaxis was 4,106.4 (3,151.6, 5,291.2) IU/kg/year. No changes in Haemophilia Joint Health Score (mean [SD] of 16.1 [19.3] versus 15.7 [17.7]), PROMIS pain intensity 3a T-score (mean [SD] 41.6 [8.2] versus 40.9 [9.1]), or Haem-A-QoL (mean [SD] 30.6 [17.3] versus 29.5 [17.4]) were observed between baseline and the end of the observation period for those using prophylaxis.

Conclusions

Prophylaxis using standard or extended half-life FVIII replacement therapies achieves adequate haemostatic control in only about half of patients, with some experiencing very poor outcomes. Real-world data highlight the urgent need to optimize prophylaxis to enhance haemostatic control, ideally achieving a zero ABR and its associated benefits.

Data Availability Statement

Qualified researchers may request access to patient-level data and related study documents. Patient-level data will be anonymized, and study documents will be redacted, including to protect the privacy of our trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data-sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.vivli.org/.


Authors' Contributions

A.W. was responsible for the study design. P.C., L.K., M.W., H.C., A.K.C.C., A.W., and J.O. contributed to data acquisition. Data analysis and interpretation were carried out by P.C., L.K., M.W., H.C., A.K.C.C., A.W., and J.O. All authors—P.C., L.K., M.W., H.C., A.K.C.C., A.W., and J.O.—were involved in drafting, reviewing, and revising the manuscript.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 29. Oktober 2024

Angenommen: 15. April 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. Juni 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Pratima Chowdary, Liane Khoo, Michael Wang, Hervé Chambost, Anthony K.C. Chan, Annemieke Willemze, Johannes Oldenburg. Prospective, Observational Study of the Clinical Outcomes of FVIII Treatment in Adults and Adolescents with Severe Haemophilia A. TH Open 2025; 09: a26219749.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2621-9749
 
  • References

  • 1 Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A. et al; WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia panelists and co-authors. WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition. Haemophilia 2020; 26 (Suppl. 06) 1-158
  • 2 Andersson NG, Auerswald G, Barnes C. et al. Intracranial haemorrhage in children and adolescents with severe haemophilia A or B—the impact of prophylactic treatment. Br J Haematol 2017; 179 (02) 298-307
  • 3 Yan S, Maro GS, Desai V, Simpson ML. A real-world analysis of commonly prescribed FVIII products based on U.S. medical charts: consumption and bleeding outcomes in hemophilia A patients. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2020; 26 (10) 1258-1265
  • 4 Reding MT, Pabinger I, Holme PA. et al. Confirmed long-term safety and efficacy of prophylactic treatment with BAY 94-9027 in severe haemophilia A: final results of the PROTECT VIII extension study. Haemophilia 2021; 27 (03) e347-e356
  • 5 Simpson ML, Desai V, Maro GS, Yan S. Comparing factor use and bleed rates in U.S. hemophilia A patients receiving prophylaxis with 3 different long-acting recombinant factor VIII products. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2020; 26 (04) 504-512
  • 6 Klamroth R, Windyga J, Radulescu V. et al. Rurioctocog alfa pegol PK-guided prophylaxis in hemophilia A: results from the phase 3 PROPEL study. Blood 2021; 137 (13) 1818-1827
  • 7 Levy-Mendelovich S, Brutman-Barazani T, Budnik I. et al. Real-world data on bleeding patterns of hemophilia A patients treated with emicizumab. J Clin Med 2021; 10 (19) 4303
  • 8 Escobar M, Bullano M, Mokdad AG. et al. A real-world evidence analysis of the impact of switching from factor VIII to emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors. Expert Rev Hematol 2023; 16 (06) 467-474
  • 9 Warren BB, Thornhill D, Stein J. et al. Young adult outcomes of childhood prophylaxis for severe hemophilia A: results of the Joint Outcome Continuation Study. Blood Adv 2020; 4 (11) 2451-2459
  • 10 Oldenburg J. Optimal treatment strategies for hemophilia: achievements and limitations of current prophylactic regimens. Blood 2015; 125 (13) 2038-2044
  • 11 Olivieri M, Kurnik K, Pfluger T, Bidlingmaier C. Identification and long-term observation of early joint damage by magnetic resonance imaging in clinically asymptomatic joints in patients with haemophilia A or B despite prophylaxis. Haemophilia 2012; 18 (03) 369-374
  • 12 Gualtierotti R, Solimeno LP, Peyvandi F. Hemophilic arthropathy: current knowledge and future perspectives. J Thromb Haemost 2021; 19 (09) 2112-2121
  • 13 Manco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD. et al. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357 (06) 535-544
  • 14 Cook KF, Jensen SE, Schalet BD. et al. PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 73: 89-102
  • 15 Mahlangu J, Powell JS, Ragni MV. et al; A-LONG Investigators. Phase 3 study of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein in severe hemophilia A. Blood 2014; 123 (03) 317-325
  • 16 Reding MT, Ng HJ, Poulsen LH. et al. Safety and efficacy of BAY 94-9027, a prolonged-half-life factor VIII. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15 (03) 411-419
  • 17 Giangrande P, Andreeva T, Chowdary P. et al; Pathfinder™2 Investigators. Clinical evaluation of glycoPEGylated recombinant FVIII: efficacy and safety in severe haemophilia A. Thromb Haemost 2017; 117 (02) 252-261
  • 18 Nolan B, Mahlangu J, Pabinger I. et al. Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein for the treatment of severe haemophilia A: final results from the ASPIRE extension study. Haemophilia 2020; 26 (03) 494-502
  • 19 Chowdary P, Mullins ES, Konkle BA. et al. Long-term safety and efficacy results from the phase 3b, open-label, multicentre continuation study of rurioctocog alfa pegol for prophylaxis in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2020; 26 (04) e168-e178
  • 20 Lentz SR, Kavakli K, Klamroth R. et al. Turoctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP) in severe hemophilia A: long-term safety and efficacy in previously treated patients of all ages in the pathfinder8 study. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2022; 6 (02) e12674
  • 21 Mannucci PM, Kessler CM, Germini F. et al. Bleeding events in people with congenital haemophilia A without factor VIII inhibitors receiving prophylactic factor VIII treatment: a systematic literature review. Haemophilia 2023; 29 (04) 954-962
  • 22 Reding MT, Simpson M, Ducore J, Holme PA, Maas Enriquez M, Mancuso ME. Long-term efficacy and safety of damoctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis in patients with haemophilia A aged 12–<18 years at enrolment into PROTECT VIII. Acta Haematol 2025; 148 (01) 58-67
  • 23 Oldenburg J, Hay C, Peyvandi F. et al; A-SURE Study Group. Superior prophylactic effectiveness of a recombinant FVIIIFc over standard half-life FVIII in hemophilia A: A-SURE study. Eur J Haematol 2025; 114 (02) 248-257
  • 24 Olivieri M, Simpson M, Yan S. et al. Analysis of pooled real-world data from Germany, Italy, and the United States of rVIII-SingleChain compared with standard- and long-acting FVIII products for prophylaxis of hemophilia A. Curr Med Res Opin 2022; 38 (07) 1133-1139
  • 25 Gringeri A, Ewenstein B, Reininger A. The burden of bleeding in haemophilia: is one bleed too many?. Haemophilia 2014; 20 (04) 459-463
  • 26 Mancuso ME, Holstein K, O'Donnell JS, Lobet S, Klamroth R. FVIII Think Tank Study Group. Synovitis and joint health in patients with haemophilia: statements from a European e-Delphi consensus study. Haemophilia 2023; 29 (02) 619-628
  • 27 van Vulpen LF, van Meegeren ME, Roosendaal G. et al. Biochemical markers of joint tissue damage increase shortly after a joint bleed; an explorative human and canine in vivo study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015; 23 (01) 63-69
  • 28 Stromer W, Pabinger I, Ay C. et al. Pain management in hemophilia: expert recommendations. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2021; 133 (19-20): 1042-1056
  • 29 Hilberg T, Czepa D, Freialdenhoven D, Boettger MK. Joint pain in people with hemophilia depends on joint status. Pain 2011; 152 (09) 2029-2035
  • 30 Forsyth AL, Witkop M, Lambing A. et al. Associations of quality of life, pain, and self-reported arthritis with age, employment, bleed rate, and utilization of hemophilia treatment center and health care provider services: results in adults with hemophilia in the HERO study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015; 9: 1549-1560
  • 31 O'Hara S, Castro FA, Black J. et al. Disease burden and remaining unmet need in patients with haemophilia A treated with primary prophylaxis. Haemophilia 2021; 27 (01) 113-119
  • 32 Skinner MW, Nugent D, Wilton P. et al. Achieving the unimaginable: health equity in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2020; 26 (01) 17-24
  • 33 den Uijl IE, Fischer K, Van Der Bom JG, Grobbee DE, Rosendaal FR, Plug I. Analysis of low frequency bleeding data: the association of joint bleeds according to baseline FVIII activity levels. Haemophilia 2011; 17 (01) 41-44
  • 34 Soucie JM, Monahan PE, Kulkarni R, Konkle BA, Mazepa MA. US Hemophilia Treatment Center Network. The frequency of joint hemorrhages and procedures in nonsevere hemophilia A vs B. Blood Adv 2018; 2 (16) 2136-2144
  • 35 Chowdary P, Fischer K, Collins PW. et al. Modeling to predict factor VIII levels associated with zero bleeds in patients with severe hemophilia A initiated on tertiary prophylaxis. Thromb Haemost 2020; 120 (05) 728-736
  • 36 Pipe SW, Montgomery RR, Pratt KP, Lenting PJ, Lillicrap D. Life in the shadow of a dominant partner: the FVIII-VWF association and its clinical implications for hemophilia A. Blood 2016; 128 (16) 2007-2016
  • 37 Fijnvandraat K, Berntorp E, ten Cate JW. et al. Recombinant, B-domain deleted factor VIII (r-VIII SQ): pharmacokinetics and initial safety aspects in hemophilia A patients. Thromb Haemost 1997; 77 (02) 298-302
  • 38 Powell JS, Nugent DJ, Harrison JA. et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of a recombinant factor VIII with pegylated liposomes in severe hemophilia A. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6 (02) 277-283
  • 39 Lissitchkov T, Willemze A, Katragadda S, Rice K, Poloskey S, Benson C. Efanesoctocog alfa for hemophilia A: results from a phase 1 repeat-dose study. Blood Adv 2022; 6 (04) 1089-1094
  • 40 Berntorp E, Hermans C, Solms A, Poulsen L, Mancuso ME. Optimising prophylaxis in haemophilia A: the ups and downs of treatment. Blood Rev 2021; 50: 100852
  • 41 Mao Q, Chen Z, Liu G. et al. Real-world use of emicizumab in Chinese children with hemophilia A: retrospective data from a comprehensive care center. Pediatr Investig 2024; 8 (04) 244-252
  • 42 Lee MW, Cheong MA, Ng HJ, Tien SL, Lam JCM. Real-world data on the use of emicizumab in patients with haemophilia A with and without inhibitors in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singap 2023; 52 (11) 580-589
  • 43 Escuriola Ettingshausen C, Eberl W, Eichler H. et al. Efficacy of emicizumab in patients with severe haemophilia A without factor VIII inhibitors in Germany: evaluation of real-life data documented by the smart medication eDiary. Ther Adv Hematol 2024 ;15:20406207241295653
  • 44 Young G, Pipe SW, Kenet G. et al. Emicizumab is well tolerated and effective in people with congenital hemophilia A regardless of age, severity of disease, or inhibitor status: a scoping review. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2024; 8 (04) 102415
  • 45 Wall C, Xiang H, Palmer B. et al; UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO). Emicizumab prophylaxis in haemophilia A with inhibitors: Three years follow-up from the UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO). Haemophilia 2023; 29 (03) 743-752
  • 46 Ozelo MC, Mahlangu J, Pasi KJ. et al; GENEr8-1 Trial Group. Valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene therapy for hemophilia A. N Engl J Med 2022; 386 (11) 1013-1025
  • 47 Sidonio Jr RF, Pipe SW, Callaghan MU, Valentino LA, Monahan PE, Croteau SE. Discussing investigational AAV gene therapy with hemophilia patients: a guide. Blood Rev 2021; 47: 100759
  • 48 Croteau SE, Wang M, Wheeler AP. 2021 clinical trials update: innovations in hemophilia therapy. Am J Hematol 2021; 96 (01) 128-144
  • 49 Mannucci PM. Hemophilia therapy: the future has begun. Haematologica 2020; 105 (03) 545-553
  • 50 von Drygalski A, Chowdary P, Kulkarni R. et al; XTEND-1 Trial Group. Efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis for patients with severe hemophilia A. N Engl J Med 2023; 388 (04) 310-318
  • 51 Kim SE, Kim JY, Park JA. et al. Real-world experience of emicizumab prophylaxis in Korean children with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors. Blood Res 2024; 59 (01) 34