RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2625-1046
Agile User-Centered Design of a Clinical Research Project Management System in a Pediatric Health Institute
Authors
Funding This study was supported by the Heart Institute at the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

Abstract
Background
Project management is crucial in academic hospitals due to the intensive involvement in research and clinical trials. Designing an application in a user-centered and workflow-compatible manner can prevent issues arising from hospital's limited resources and various risks (e.g., financial risk and ethical misconduct).
Objectives
This study aimed to (1) develop a hybrid method combining user-centered design (UCD) and agile software development (ASD) principles, (2) apply the hybrid model to develop a Clinical Research Project Management System (CRPMS), (3) assess the usability of the CRPMS and iteratively refine the application.
Materials and Methods
A CRPMS was developed following the UCD and ASD principles and supported by a research core in a pediatric heart institute. In Phase 0, semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand processes and bottlenecks. In Phase 1, the project management and budgeting sections of the CRPMS were simultaneously developed. In Phase 2, the Principal Investigator dashboard and the intake section of the CRPMS were developed. Usability evaluation metrics included the System Usability Scale (SUS), Single Ease Question, and severity scores.
Results
In Phase 1, the average SUS score was 88.65. There were 126 usability issues and 68 were considered high severity due to the SUS score cutoff (>1.5). In Phase 2, the average SUS score was 87.1. All of the 71 usability issues were addressed during the iterative refinements.
Conclusion
A workflow-compatible and highly user-friendly CRPMS was developed by employing a hybrid Agile UCD model. Future work includes continuing development and expanding the CRPMS within and outside the institute.
Keywords
research planning and conduct - interfaces and usability - workflow - evaluation - user acceptance and resistanceProtection of Human and Animal Subjects
The study was reviewed and approved by the institution's IRB (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center: 2024-0414).
Author Contributions
The first author (DW) designed and mentored the second author (MS) to survey the literature, design the study, and draft the manuscript. The third author (AR) helped draft the introduction, described the methodology, and develop the application with (SG). The designers (CX, TZ and CT) created the mockups and collected and analyzed the user feedback. JD, MF and AK helped the design and execution of the workflow analysis and usability testing as well as provided feedback to the mockups. All authors discussed the findings and helped improve the clarity and value of the manuscript.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 27. Juni 2024
Angenommen: 11. Mai 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. Juli 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Findley TW, Daum MC, Macedo JA. Research in physical medicine and rehabilitation. VI. Research project management. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 68 (06) 288-299
- 2 Lenz ER. Strategies for successful research project management. Nurs Leadersh Forum 1999; 4 (01) 26-31
- 3 Howe R, Flanagan C. Case managers getting it done: a project management primer. Lippincotts Case Manag 2004; 9 (03) 152-154
- 4 Nevan Wright J. Time and budget: the twin imperatives of a project sponsor. Int J Proj Manag 1997; 15 (03) 181-186
- 5 Project Management Institute, ed. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge/Project Management Institute. 6th ed.. Project Management Institute; 2017
- 6 Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine Association of Chinese Medical Association. [Urgent to implement and perfect clinical research project management regulation]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2019; 99 (28) 2166-2168
- 7 Kalankesh LR, Nasiry Z, Fein RA, Damanabi S. Factors influencing user satisfaction with information systems: a systematic review. Galen Med J 2020; 9: e1686
- 8 Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43 (01) 159-172
- 9 Shneiderman B. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer-Interaction. 3rd ed.. Addison Wesley Longman; 1998
- 10 Norman DA. The Design of Everyday Things. Rev. and expanded edition. MIT Press; 2013
- 11 What is User Centered Design?—updated 2023. IxDF. . Accessed December 12, 2023 at: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/user-centered-design
- 12 User Centered Design: definition, benefits, principles, and methods. Accessed December 12, 2023 at: https://uxcam.com/blog/understanding-user-centered-design/
- 13 Turning Usability Testing Data into Action. Toptal. . Accessed December 12, 2023 at: https://www.toptal.com/designers/usability-testing/turning-usability-testing-data-into-action
- 14 Usability testing in design—why is it important? by Shree Harsha. UX Collective. . Accessed December 12, 2023 at: https://uxdesign.cc/usability-testing-in-design-and-why-is-it-important-cfddfbbdaac9
- 15 What Is Usability Testing?—Baymard Institute. . Accessed December 12, 2023 at: https://baymard.com/learn/usability-testing
- 16 NEXT. Product discovery platform. Accessed December 12, 2023 at: https://www.nextapp.co/glossary/guides/user-centered-design
- 17 ISO 9241-11:2018(en), Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. Accessed March 11, 2024 at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en
- 18 User-centered design approach: Complete guide. Opensense Labs. . Accessed December 12, 2023 at: https://opensenselabs.com/blog/articles/user-centered-design-approach-core-principles-methods
- 19 Making Usability Findings Actionable. Nielsen Norman Group. . Accessed February 20, 2025 at: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/actionable-usability-findings/
- 20 What is Agile Software Development?. Accessed December 12, 2023 at: https://www.visual-paradigm.com/scrum/what-is-agile-software-development/
- 21 Adobe Communications Team. What is Agile Software Development?. Adobe Workfront. . Accessed December 12, 2023 at: https://business.adobe.com/blog/basics/agile-development
- 22 What Is Agile Software Development?. Aha! Accessed December 12, 2023 at: https://www.aha.io/roadmapping/guide/agile/agile-software-development
- 23 What is Scrum?. Scrum.org. . Accessed March 26, 2024 at: https://www.scrum.org/resources/what-scrum-module
- 24 Peres AL, Meira SL. Towards a framework that promotes integration between the UX design and SCRUM, Aligned to CMMI. In: 2015 10th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). IEEE; 2015: 1-4
- 25 Zotov E, Hills AF, de Mello FL. et al. JointCalc: a web-based personalised patient decision support tool for joint replacement. Int J Med Inform 2020; 142: 104217
- 26 Tobias G, Spanier AB. Developing a mobile app (iGAM) to promote gingival health by professional monitoring of dental selfies: user-centered design approach. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8 (08) e19433
- 27 Melnick ER, Lopez K, Hess EP. et al. Back to the bedside: developing a bedside aid for concussion and brain injury decisions in the emergency department. EGEMS (Wash DC) 2015; 3 (02) 1136
- 28 Backman C, Harley A, Peyton L. et al. Development of a path to home mobile app for the geriatric rehabilitation program at bruyère continuing care: protocol for user-centered design and feasibility testing studies. JMIR Res Protoc 2018; 7 (09) e11031
- 29 Leppla L, Hobelsberger S, Rockstein D. et al; SMILe study team. Implementation science meets software development to create eHealth components for an integrated care model for allogeneic stem cell transplantation facilitated by eHealth: the SMILe study as an example. J Nurs Scholarsh 2021; 53 (01) 35-45
- 30 Barr PJ, Haslett W, Dannenberg MD. et al. An audio personal health library of clinic visit recordings for patients and their caregivers (HealthPAL): user-centered design approach. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23 (10) e25512
- 31 Aldossari R, Albesher L, Alshammari M. et al; Challenges of integrating Agile and UX/UCD: systematic literature review. 2022
- 32 Heart Institute. Cincinnati Children's. Accessed December 12, 2023 at: https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/service/h/heart-institute
- 33 Keiser S, Vandermar D, Garner MB. Beyond Design: The Synergy of Apparel Product Development. 5th ed.. Fairchild Books; 2022.
- 34 Affairs AS for P. System Usability Scale (SUS). September 6, 2013. Accessed January 12, 2024 at: https://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/system-usability-scale.html
- 35 Maguire M, Delahunt B. Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J Irel J Teach Learn High Educ 2017; 9 (03) 3351-3364
- 36 Ferreira J, Noble J, Biddle R. Agile development iterations and UI design. In: AGILE 2007 (AGILE 2007). IEEE; 2007: 50-58
- 37 Losada B. Flexible requirement development through user objectives in an Agile-UCD hybrid approach. In: Proceedings of the XIX International Conference on Human Computer Interaction. ACM; 2018: 1-8
- 38 Sensuse DI, Satria D, Pratama AA, Wulandari IA, Mishbah M, Noprisson H. Integrating UCD into Scrumban for better and faster usability design. In: 2017 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI). IEEE; 2017: 297-302
- 39 Teka D, Dittrich Y, Kifle M. Integrating discount usability in scrum development process in Ethiopia. In: 2017 International Conference on Computing Networking and Informatics (ICCNI). IEEE; 2017: 1-8
- 40 Teka D, Dittrich Y, Kifle M. Adapting lightweight user-centered design with the scrum-based development process. In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Software Engineering in Africa. ACM; 2018: 35-42
- 41 Williams A. User-centered design, activity-centered design, and goal-directed design: a review of three methods for designing web applications. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. ACM; 2009: 1-8
- 42 Ghaben SJ, Mat Ludin AF, Mohamad Ali N, Beng Gan K, Singh DKA. A framework for design and usability testing of telerehabilitation system for adults with chronic diseases: a panoramic scoping review. Digit Health 2023;9:20552076231191014
- 43 Qudah B, Luetsch K. The influence of mobile health applications on patient - healthcare provider relationships: a systematic, narrative review. Patient Educ Couns 2019; 102 (06) 1080-1089
- 44 Wood R, Dixon E, Elsayed-Ali S, Shokeen E, Lazar A, Lazar J. Investigating best practices for remote summative usability testing with people with mild to moderate dementia. ACM Trans Access Comput 2021; 14 (03)
- 45 Downie AS, Hancock M, Abdel Shaheed C. et al. An electronic clinical decision support system for the management of low back pain in community pharmacy: development and mixed methods feasibility study. JMIR Med Inform 2020; 8 (05) e17203
- 46 Dopp AR, Parisi KE, Munson SA, Lyon AR. A glossary of user-centered design strategies for implementation experts. Transl Behav Med 2019; 9 (06) 1057-1064
- 47 Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users. Nielsen Norman Group. . Accessed January 12, 2024 at: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/