Int J Sports Med
DOI: 10.1055/a-2627-3277
Review

Osteoarthritis exercise interventions for a younger adult population – a narrative review

Fearghal Behan
1   Disciple of Physiotherapy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN8809)
,
Thomas Oswald
2   School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nottingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN12207)
,
3   Academic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Loughborough, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN159061)
4   Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nottingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN12207)
› Institutsangaben
Preview

Osteoarthritis (OA) is considered to be a condition attributable to aging, however, symptoms can start under 45 years-old in one-fifth of patients. Exercise therapy is recommended as first-line treatment in all OA guidance; however, uncertainty remains regarding optimal exercise programmes (including strength, aerobic or mind-body interventions) as different populations might respond better to one intervention than another. This review aims to understand the evidence surrounding exercise interventions for OA in younger adults (18-50 years old). An umbrella review methodology was adopted. Individual studies included in 50 systematic reviews (± meta-analyses) published in the last decade were reviewed and those involving participants aged 18-50 selected. Five papers, from a potential 1046, involved appropriate participants and underwent full-text review. Two were excluded due to pathology and language; therefore three studies with 265 participants were included. Exercise interventions included strength-based, neuromuscular control and aerobic, and were delivered under supervision or via sensor or virtual reality technology. Interventions improved pain, functional, cartilage composition and inflammatory outcomes measures; however, study heterogeneity prevented direct comparison and meta-analysis. There is a clear bias in the literature for an older population, with research and clinical interventions required for a younger adult population with, or at risk, of OA.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 28. November 2024

Angenommen nach Revision: 03. Juni 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
04. Juni 2025

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany