Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2649-9074
Original Research

Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy Plate Design Influences Interfragmentary Compression: An In Vitro Study

1   Southern Counties Veterinary Specialists, Hampshire, United Kingdom
,
2   Pride Veterinary Referrals, Derby, United Kingdom
,
1   Southern Counties Veterinary Specialists, Hampshire, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations

Funding This project was funded by IVC Evidensia Research Fund.
Preview

Abstract

Objectives

To compare immediate, static interfragmentary compression patterns of three tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) plate designs.

Study Design

TPLO was performed on 15 synthetic canine tibiae (SYNBONE AG, Switzerland) using 3D-printed guides. Compression was evaluated using pressure-sensitive films (Prescale, Fujifilm, UK). Three 3.5-mm TPLO plates were tested according to the manufacturer guidelines for dynamic compression screws placement: Synthes, Arthrex, and Biocurve. Each plate was tested five times using a new bone model. The interfragmentary surface was divided into quadrants: Q1 (craniomedial), Q2 (craniolateral), Q3 (caudomedial), and Q4 (caudolateral). Compression was classified as low (<0.12 MPa), moderate (0.12–0.25 MPa), or high (>0.25 MPa).

Results

Significant differences in overall interfragmentary compression were found among the plates (p < 0.001). The Biocurve plate generated the highest and most uniform compression (Q1: 0.285 ± 0.023 MPa; Q2: 0.304 ± 0.010 MPa; Q3: 0.220 ± 0.014 MPa; Q4: 0.237 ± 0.010 MPa). The Arthrex plate produced high compression in Q2 (0.292 ± 0.012 MPa) and moderate in other quadrants (Q1: 0.177 ± 0.016 MPa; Q3: 0.141 ± 0.011 MPa; Q4: 0.189 ± 0.013 MPa). The Synthes plate showed the lowest compression throughout (Q1: 0.050 ± 0.008 MPa; Q2: 0.075 ± 0.009 MPa; Q3: 0.111 ± 0.008 MPa; Q4: 0.109 ± 0.008 MPa).

Conclusion

The Biocurve plate, with two angled dynamic compression screw holes, provided the highest, most uniform compression. Further studies are needed to assess clinical relevance.

Authors' Contribution

D.M. developed the study design, designed the 3D-printed guides, contributed to data collection and analysis, manuscript drafting, and reviewing. R.A. contributed to study design, data collection and analysis, manuscript drafting, and reviewing. M.Z. contributed to data collection, manuscript drafting, and reviewing.




Publication History

Received: 05 December 2024

Accepted: 04 July 2025

Article published online:
01 August 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany