Does Breathing Every Two Cycles Reduce the Breaststroke Energy Cost?

World Aquatics rules require only part of the swimmer’s head to break the surface each breaststroke cycle. We aimed to assess the impact of breathing every one or two cycles in breaststroke on energy cost (C) and related bioenergetic variables. Fifteen swimmers completed a 6-week intervention to learn the new breathing pattern, followed by a 5×200-m step test (0.05-m∙s⁻¹ increments, 30-s rest) in both patterns. Oxygen consumption (VO₂) and blood lactate ([La⁻]) were measured to calculate energy expenditure (E _tot) and C. Linear and exponential regressions were computed between E _tot and velocity. Paired t-tests and ANCOVA were applied, controlling for World Aquatics points and age. [La⁻] peak, VO₂ peak, E _tot, and C were lower at some intensities when breathing every cycle. Adjusted analyses showed higher E _tot with breathing every two cycles at steps 1, 2, and 5. Linear and exponential regressions showed strong associations for both breathing patterns (r ²=0.74 vs. 0.72, respectively). Individual regressions showed similar patterns in some swimmers, while others differed. Breathing every two cycles elicited higher bioenergetic responses at steps 1, 2, and 5 and did not prove effective during incremental 200-m efforts when compared to the traditional breathing pattern.

Keywords

oxygen consumption - lactate concentration - performance

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 18. Februar 2025

Angenommen nach Revision: 14. Juli 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. August 2025

• References

• 1 Pedersen T, Kjendlie PL. The effect of the breathing action on velocity in front crawl sprinting. Portuguese J Sport Sci. 2006; 6 (02) 75-77
• 2 Alves F, Cunha P, Gomes-Pereira J. Kinematic changes with inspiratory actions in butterfly swimming. In: Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander AP, editors Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming VIII. Finland, Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla; 1999. pp. 9-14
• 3 Hahn A, Krug T. Application of knowledge gained from the coordination of partial movements in breaststroke and butterfly swimming for the development of technical training. Swimming Sci 1992; VI: 167-171
• 4 de Jesus K, de Jesus K, Figueiredo PA, Gonçalves P, Vilas-Boas JP, Fernandes RJ. Effects of fatigue on kinematical parameters during submaximal and maximal 100-m butterfly bouts. J Appl Biomech 2012; 28: 599-607
• 5 Seifert L, Chollet D, Sanders R. Does breathing disturb coordination in butterfly?. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31 (03) 167-173
• 6 Kapus J, Usaj A, Kapus V, Strumbelj B. Influence of reduced breathing during swimming on some respiratory and metabolic values in blood. Kinesiol Slovenica. 2003; 9: 12-17
• 7 Key MA, Eschbach CL, Bunn JA. Assessment of the effects of controlled frequency breathing on lactate levels in swimming. J Athl Enhancement 2014; 3 (05) 2
• 8 Murlasits Z, Laszlo S, Prokai J. et al. Physiological responses to an incremental swim test with different breathing frequencies in competitive male youth swimmers. J Phys Educ Sport. 2023; 23 (03) 697-703
• 9 West SA, Drummond MJ, VanNess JM, Ciccolella ME. Blood lactate and metabolic responses to controlled frequency breathing during graded swimming. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19 (04) 772-776
• 10 Dicker SG, Lofthus GK, Thornton NW, Brooks GA. Respiratory and heart rate responses to tethered controlled frequency breathing swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1980; 12 (01) 20-23
• 11 Gatta G, Cortesi M, Fantozzi S, Zamparo P. Planimetric frontal area in the four swimming strokes: Implications for drag, energetics and speed. Hum Mov Sci 2015; 39: 41-54
• 12 Kolmogorov SV, Rumyantseva OA, Gordon BJ, Cappaert JM. Hydrodynamic characteristics of competitive swimmers of different genders and performance levels. J Appl Biomech 1997; 13 (01) 88-97
• 13 Xin-Feng W, Lian-Ze W, Wei-Xing Y, De-Jian L, Xiong S. A new device for estimating active drag in swimming at maximal velocity. J Sports Sci 2007; 25 (04) 375-379
• 14 Barbosa TM, Fernandes R, Keskinen KL. et al. Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes. Int J Sports Med 2006; 27 (11) 894-899
• 15 Capelli C, Pendergast DR, Termin B. Energetics of swimming at maximal speeds in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1998; 78: 385-393
• 16 Kolmogorov S, Vorontsov A, Vilas-Boas JP. Metabolic power, active drag, mechanical and propelling efficiency of elite swimmers at 100 meter events in different competitive swimming techniques. Appl Sci. 2021; 11 (18) 8511
• 17 Zompanakis I, Papadimitriou K, Georgios T, Dimitrios L. The Effects of Reduce Breathing on Swimming Performance and in Blood Lactate Concentration in 25 and 50 m Breaststroke at Maximal Intensity. J Swimming Res. 2020; 27 (02) 30
• 18 Alves M, Barbosa TM, Vilas-Boas JP. Exploring the impact of breathing patterns on active drag in breaststroke swimming. J Biomech 2024; 177: 112390
• 19 Chatard JC, Lavoie JM, Lacour JR. Analysis of determinants of swimming economy in front crawl. Eur J Appl Physiol 1990; 61: 88-92
• 20 Kjendlie PL, Ingjer F, Madsen O, Stallman RK, Stray-Gundersen J. Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 91: 473-480
• 21 Kjendlie PL, Stallman RK. Drag characteristics of competitive swimming children and adults. J Appl Biomech 2008; 24 (01) 35-42
• 22 Pendergast D, Mollendorf J, Zamparo P, Termin A, Bushnell D, Paschke D. The influence of drag on human locomotion in water. Undersea Hyperb Med 2005; 32 (01) 45-57
• 23 Vilas-Boas JP, Costa L, Fernandes R. et al. Determination of the drag coefficient during the first and second gliding positions of the breaststroke underwater stroke. J Appl Biomech 2010; 26 (03) 324-331
• 24 Chainok P, de Jesus K, Coelho L. et al. Modeling and predicting the backstroke to breaststroke turns performance in age-group swimmers. Sports Biomech 2023; 22 (12) 1700-1721
• 25 Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav 2004; 36 (02) 212-224
• 26 Dadashi F, Millet G, Aminian K. Inertial measurement unit and biomechanical analysis of swimming: an update. Swiss Soc Sports Med 2013; 61: 21-26
• 27 Fernandes R, Sousa M, Pinheiro A, Vilar S, Colaço P, Vilas-Boas JP. Assessment of individual anaerobic threshold and stroking parameters in swimmers aged 10-11 years. Eur J Sport Sci 2010; 10 (05) 311-317
• 28 Carvalho DD, Soares S, Zacca R. et al. Anaerobic threshold biophysical characterization of the four swimming techniques. Int J Sports Med 2020; 41 (05) 318-327
• 29 Monteiro AS, Carvalho DD, Azevedo R, Vilas-Boas JP, Zacca R, Fernandes RJ. Post-swim oxygen consumption: assessment methodologies and kinetics analysis. Physiol Meas 2020; 41 (10) 105005
• 30 Fernandes RJ, de Jesus K, Baldari C. et al. Different VO2max time-averaging intervals in swimming. Int J Sports Med. 2012; 33: 1010-1015
• 31 Zacca R, Azevedo R, Silveira R. et al. Comparison of incremental intermittent and time trial testing in age-group swimmers. J Strength Cond Res. 2019; 33 (03) 801-810
• 32 Gonjo T, McCabe C, Coleman S. et al. Do swimmers conform to criterion speed during pace-controlled swimming in a 25-m pool using a visual light pacer?. Sports Biomech 2021; 20 (06) 651-664
• 33 Sousa CA, Vilas-Boas JP, Fernandes RJ. VO2 kinetics and metabolic contributions whilst swimming at 95, 100, and 105% of the velocity at VO2max. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 1–9: 675363
• 34 Zacca R, Mezêncio B, Castro FAS. et al. Case study: comparison of swimsuits and wetsuits through biomechanics and energetics in elite female open water swimmers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2022; 17: 130-136
• 35 Wakayoshi K, Yoshida T, Udo M. et al. Does critical swimming velocity represent exercise intensity at maximal lactate steady state?. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1993; 66: 90-95
• 36 Lavoie JM, Léger LA, Montpetit RR, Chabot S. Backward extrapolation of VO2 from the O2 recovery curve after a voluntary maximal 400 m swim. Biomech Med Swimming 1983; 14: 222-227
• 37 Fernandes RJ, Billat VL, Cruz AC, Colaço PJ, Cardoso CS, Vilas-Boas JP. Has gender any effect on the relationship between time limit at VO2max velocity and swimming economy?. J Hum Mov Stud 2005; 49: 127-148
• 38 Thevelein X, Daly D, Persyn U. Measurement of total energy use in the evaluation of competitive swimmers. In: Bachl N, Prakop L, Suckaert R, editors. Current topics in sports medicine. Wien: Urban & Schwartzenberg; 1984. pp. 668-676
• 39 Vilas-Boas JP, Santos PJ. Comparison of swimming economy in three breaststroke techniques. In: Miyashita M, Mutoh M, Richardson AB, editors Medicine and science in aquatic sports, medicine and sport science. Karger; 1994. pp. 48-54
• 40 Figueiredo P, Toussaint H, Vilas-Boas JP, Fernandes RJ. Relation between efficiency and energy cost with coordination in aquatic locomotion. Eur J Appl Physiol 2013; 113: 651-659
• 41 Fernandes A, Costa MJ, Mezêncio B, Vilas-Boas JP, Fernandes RJ. Breaststroke and butterfly intercycle kinematic variation according to different competitive levels with Statistical Parametric Mapping analysis. J Biomech 2024; 176: 112380
• 42 Troup J. Aerobic characteristics of the four competitive strokes. Annual Studies by the International Center for Aquatic Research; 1991. pp. 3-7
• 43 Hólmer I, Gullstrand L. Physiological responses to swimming with a controlled frequency of breathing. Scand J Sports Sci 1980; 2: 1-6
• 44 Counsilman JE. Hypoxic and other methods of training evaluated. Swimming Tech 1975; 12 (01) 19-26
• 45 Di Prampero PE, Dekerle J, Capelli C, Zamparo P. The critical velocity in swimming. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008; 102 (02) 165-171
• 46 Holfelder B, Brown N, Bubeck D, Ruiz JR. The influence of sex, stroke and distance on the lactate characteristics in high performance swimming. PLoS One 2013; 8 (10) e77185
• 47 Marinho DA, Amorim RA, Costa AM, Marques MC, Pérez-Turpin JA, Neiva HP. “Anaerobic” critical velocity and swimming performance in young swimmers. J Hum Sport & Exerc 2011; 6 (01) 80-86
• 48 Lomax M, Royal JT, Kapus J, Massey H, Saynor Z. Oxygen uptake kinetics and ventilatory and metabolic parameters do not differ between moderate-intensity front crawl and breaststroke swimming. Physiological Rep 2022; 10 (12) e15361
• 49 Sanders RH. Can skilled performers readily change technique? An example, conventional to wave action breaststroke. Hum Mov Sci 1995; 14 (06) 665-679
• 50 Figueiredo P, Zamparo P, Sousa A, Vilas-Boas JP, Fernandes RJ. An energy balance of the 200 m front crawl race. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 767-777
• 51 Leblanc H, Seifert L, Tourny-Chollet C, Chollet D. Intra-cyclic distance per stroke phase, velocity fluctuations and acceleration time ratio of a breaststroker’s hip: a comparison between elite and nonelite swimmers at different race paces. Int J Sports Med 2007; 28 (02) 140-147
• 52 Oxford SW, James RS, Price MJ, Payton CJ, Duncan MJ. Changes in kinematics and arm–leg coordination during a 100-m breaststroke swim. J Sports Sci 2017; 35 (16) 1658-1665
• 53 Takagi H, Sugimoto S, Nishijima N, Wilson B. Swimming: Differences in stroke phases, arm-leg coordination and velocity fluctuation due to event, gender and performance level in breaststroke. Sports Biomech 2004; 3 (01) 15-27
• 54 Chollet D, Seifert L, Leblanc H, Boulesteix L, Carter M. Evaluation of arm-leg coordination in flat breaststroke. Int J Sports Med 2004; 25 (07) 486-495
• 55 Seifert L, Chollet D. A new index of flat breaststroke propulsion: A comparison of elite men and women. J Sports Sci 2005; 23 (03) 309-320