Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2658-0326
Mapping the Clinical Care Pathway of Fragility Fracture Patients at a German Maximum Care Provider Through Qualitative Research
Analyse des klinischen Behandlungspfades von Patienten mit Fragilitätsfrakturen durch qualitative Recherche in einem deutschen MaximalversorgerSupported by: Amgen Inc.
Supported by: UCB

Abstract
Osteoporosis is a chronic underdiagnosed condition that weakens bone structure with increased risk of fragility fractures. While the prevalence of osteoporosis is expected to increase due to demographic developments in many countries, there is found to be a serious treatment gap for patients. This is partly due to inadequate diagnostic procedures at healthcare facilities. Considering this, there is a need to understand factors that affect processes involving diagnosis and treatment in osteoporotic patients. This study’s primary aim is to explore the management of patients with fragility fractures and osteoporosis by conducting and analyzing semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals at a German maximum care provider. Insights from the interviews were used to map out the pathway of clinical care for patients and the results suggest a multitude of factors including disease awareness, communication, and up-to-date information to be particularly important for increased treatment quality. Future studies shall focus on improving generalizability and exploring the effectiveness of recently updated guidelines for management of osteoporosis.
Zusammenfassung
Osteoporose ist eine chronische, unterdiagnostizierte Erkrankung, die die Knochenstruktur schwächt und das Risiko für Fragilitätsfrakturen erhöht. Aufgrund der demografischen Entwicklungen in vielen Ländern wird eine Zunahme der Prävalenz von Osteoporose vermutet, jedoch besteht eine erhebliche Behandlungslücke bei Frakturpatienten. Dies ist teilweise auf unzureichende diagnostische Verfahren in Gesundheitseinrichtungen zurückzuführen. Daher ist es notwendig, die Faktoren zu verstehen, welche die Prozesse der Diagnostik und Behandlung von Osteoporosepatienten beeinflussen. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, das Management von Patienten mit Fragilitätsfrakturen und Osteoporose zu untersuchen, indem semistrukturierte Interviews mit medizinischem Fachpersonal eines deutschen Maximalversorgers durchgeführt und analysiert werden. Die Erkenntnisse aus den Interviews wurden genutzt, um den Behandlungspfad klinisch abzubilden. Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass eine Vielzahl von Faktoren, einschl. Krankheitsbewusstsein, Kommunikation und aktueller Informationen, für eine erhöhte Behandlungsqualität besonders wichtig sind.
Keywords
osteoporosis - fragility fractures - clinical care pathway - qualitative research - pathwaySchlüsselwörter
Osteoporose - klinischer Behandlungspfad - qualitative Forschung - Ffragilitätsfraktur - BehandlungspfadPublication History
Received: 17 January 2024
Accepted after revision: 27 June 2025
Article published online:
08 August 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Borgström F, Karlsson L, Ortsäter G. et al. Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities. Arch Osteoporos 2020; 15: 59
- 2 Kanis JA, Norton N, Harvey NC. et al. SCOPE 2021: a new scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe. Arch Osteoporos 2021; 16: 82
- 3 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Osteoporosis: assessing the risk of fragility fracture. Clinical guideline CG146. Published 08 August 2012. Last updated: 07 February 2017. Accessed July 21, 2025 at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg146
- 4 Cummings SR, Melton LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 2002; 359: 1761-1767
- 5 Kelsey JL, Samelson EJ. Variation in risk factors for fractures at different sites. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2009; 7: 127-133
- 6 Parker M, Johansen A. Hip fracture. BMJ 2006; 333: 27-30
- 7 Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17: 1726-1733
- 8 Kanis JA. World Health Organization Scientific Group. Assessment of Osteoporosis at the Primary Health Care Level. Technical Report. 2007 Accessed July 21, 2025 at: https://frax.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/pdfs/WHO_Technical_Report.pdf
- 9 Sànchez-Riera L, Wilson N, Kamalaraj N. et al. Osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010; 24: 793-810
- 10 McCloskey E, Rathi J, Heijmans S. et al. The osteoporosis treatment gap in patients at risk of fracture in European primary care: a multi-country cross-sectional observational study. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32: 251-259
- 11 Narula S, Kelly D, Welthy L. et al. Implementation of a clinical pathway for osteoporosis management within an Orthopaedic Fracture Clinic. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92: 2661-2666
- 12 Vogel T, Kampmann P, Bürklein D. et al. Versorgungswirklichkeit bei osteoporosebedingten Frakturen in der deutschen Unfallchirurgie. Ein Beitrag zur Versorgungsforschung. Unfallchirurg 2008; 111: 869-877
- 13 Mayring P. Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Social Research 2000; 1: 20
- 14 Helmke S. Where to start when everything feels urgent. Learning Professional 2022; 43: 72-74
- 15 Sorbi R, Aghamirsalim MR. Knowledge of orthopaedic surgeons in managing patients with fragility fracture. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 1275-1279
- 16 Lee JK, Mitchell PJ, Ang SB. et al. Survey of awareness and attitudes to the management of fragility fractures among the membership of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. Arch Osteoporos 2024; 19: 24
- 17 Harvey NCW, McCloskey EV, Mitchell PJ. et al. Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28: 1507-1529
- 18 Åkesson KE, Ganda K, Deignan C. et al. Post-fracture care programs for prevention of subsequent fragility fractures: a literature assessment of current trends. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33: 1659-1676
- 19 Nakayama A, Major G, Holliday E. et al. Evidence of effectiveness of a fracture liaison service to reduce the re-fracture rate. Osteoporos Int 2016; 27: 873-879
- 20 Geiger I, Kammerlander C, Höfer C. et al. Implementation of an integrated care programme to avoid fragility fractures of the hip in older adults in 18 Bavarian hospitals - study protocol for the cluster-randomised controlled fracture liaison service FLS-CARE. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21: 43