J Knee Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2684-8148
Original Article

A Greater Rate of Return to High-Impact Sports Favoring Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

1   Department of Sports Medicine and Computer Assisted Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, United States
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Gaby V. ten Noever de Brauw
1   Department of Sports Medicine and Computer Assisted Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, United States
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
,
Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Andrew D. Pearle
1   Department of Sports Medicine and Computer Assisted Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, United States
,
Hendrik A. Zuiderbaan
4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Medische Kliniek Velsen, Velsen-Noord, The Netherlands, United States
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated the importance of patient expectation management following surgery, as this is a crucial factor influencing postoperative outcomes. Informing patients on the likelihood on return to sport (RTS) following a knee arthroplasty is therefore important. This systematic review aimed to compare RTS rates and RTS rates per sport-impact level for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), or patellofemoral knee arthroplasty (PFA). A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane up to June 1, 2024. Studies reporting on RTS rate following TKA, medial UKA, or PFA were included. RTS rates per sport impact level, Tegner–Lysholm, and University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scores were extracted. Outcomes were compared with meta-analysis using random-effect models. Thirty-eight studies were included for qualitative assessment, of which eight for meta-analysis, comprising 7,634 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly greater likelihood for UKA patients (80.7% [18.4–100%]) to RTS than TKA patients (69.0% [4.1–100%]; odds ratio: 1.87 [1.23–2.85], p = 0.004). In high-impact sports, UKA patients (65.4% [18.4–100%]) were able to RTS at a higher rate than TKA patients (TKA 4.4% [4.1–12.5%]). RTS to low- and moderate-impact sports were similar. Postoperative UCLA activity score was superior for UKA patients and postoperative Tegner scores between UKA and TKA were similar. PFA patients returned to sports at a low rate (low-impact 42.4% [41.2–43.5%]; moderate-impact 35.0% [34.8–41.2%]; high-impact 20.5% [17.4–35.3%]). UKA Patients had a significantly higher overall RTS rate than TKA patients. Over 50% of UKA patients were able to return to high-impact sports, whereas only 5% of TKA patients achieved this outcome. The likelihood of RTS appeared lowest among patients who underwent PFA. A more liberal counseling regarding return to high-impact sports following UKA may be justified.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 12 November 2024

Accepted: 15 August 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
18 August 2025

Article published online:
02 September 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA