Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2684-8287
Graft Angle, Intercondylar Notch Osteophytes, and Tibial Tunnel Abnormalities Influence Graft Impingement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective MRI-Based Study

Abstract
Graft impingement is a critical cause of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure. Identifying its contributing factors is essential for improving surgical outcomes. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the incidence of graft impingement following ACLR using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to investigate potential anatomical and surgical risk factors. The findings are intended to provide theoretical support for reducing impingement rates and enhancing functional recovery. We retrospectively reviewed clinical and MRI data of 122 patients (68 males and 54 females) who underwent ACLR at our institution from January 2015 to December 2023. MRI was used to identify graft impingement and to measure potential anatomical and surgical factors, including graft angle, posterior tibial slope, tibial intercondylar eminence angle, intercondylar notch width, notch height, and roof inclination, tibial tunnel position, preoperative and postoperative tibial displacement (measured as anterior tibial translation), and concomitant injuries. Patients were categorized based on the presence or absence of impingement. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariable logistic regression to identify independent risk factors. Graft impingement occurred in 65 patients (53.3% of cases). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that smaller graft angles (odds ratio [OR] = 0.930, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.873–0.991, p = 0.026), anterior–inferior osteophytes of the intercondylar notch roof (OR = 3.620, 95% CI: 1.408–9.311, p = 0.008), bony abnormalities at the tibial tunnel inlet (OR = 3.814, 95% CI: 1.509–9.632, p = 0.005) and postoperative tibial displacement >5 mm (OR = 6.573, 95% CI: 1.120–38.582, p = 0.037) were independent risk factors for graft impingement. Graft impingement after ACLR is independently associated with reduced graft angle, anterior–inferior osteophytes of the intercondylar notch, excessive postoperative tibial displacement, and bony protrusions at the tibial tunnel inlet. These findings emphasize the importance of accurate tunnel positioning and anatomical assessment during surgery to improve patient outcomes.
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - graft impingement - magnetic resonance imaging - graft angleContributors' Statement
M.W., Z.Y., J.X., K.S., C.M., F.Z., and C.F. contributed to the study design. M.W. and Z.Y. conducted the literature search. J.X. and K.S. acquired the data. C.M. wrote the article. F.Z. performed data analysis. C.F. revised the article and gave the final approval of the version to be submitted. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics Approval
This study has been reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University with the approval number: 2023-YX-238.
Publication History
Received: 06 May 2025
Accepted: 15 August 2025
Article published online:
29 August 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Snoeker B, Turkiewicz A, Magnusson K. et al. Risk of knee osteoarthritis after different types of knee injuries in young adults: a population-based cohort study. Br J Sports Med 2020; 54 (12) 725-730
- 2 Mather III RC, Koenig L, Kocher MS. et al; MOON Knee Group. Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (19) 1751-1759
- 3 Griffin LY, Albohm MJ, Arendt EA. et al. Understanding and preventing noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a review of the Hunt Valley II meeting, January 2005. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (09) 1512-1532
- 4 Noyes FR, Huser LE, Levy MS. The effect of an ACL reconstruction in controlling rotational knee stability in knees with intact and physiologic laxity of secondary restraints as defined by tibiofemoral compartment translations and graft forces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (07) 586-597
- 5 Chinese Specialist Consensus Group On New Generation Artificial Ligaments Used For Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. [Core techniques and adverse events in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a new generation of artificial ligaments: the consensus of Chinese specialists based on a modified Delphi method (Part 2)]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2022; 36 (09) 1047-1055
- 6 Kaeding CC, Pedroza AD, Reinke EK, Huston LJ, Spindler KP. MOON Consortium. Risk factors and predictors of subsequent ACL injury in either knee after ACL reconstruction: prospective analysis of 2488 primary ACL reconstructions from the MOON cohort. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (07) 1583-1590
- 7 Sommer C, Friederich NF, Müller W. Improperly placed anterior cruciate ligament grafts: correlation between radiological parameters and clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2000; 8 (04) 207-213
- 8 Kulczycka P, Larbi A, Malghem J, Thienpont E, Vande Berg B, Lecouvet F. Imaging ACL reconstructions and their complications. Diagn Interv Imaging 2015; 96 (01) 11-19
- 9 Lubis AMT, Kuncoro MW. Revision of failed-posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction due to tibial tunnel misplacement: a case report. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2019; 48: 105-108
- 10 Wilson WT, Hopper GP, O'Boyle M, Henderson L, Blyth MJG. Quantifying graft impingement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 2022; 34: 270-278
- 11 Iriuchishima T, Shirakura K, Fu FH. Graft impingement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (03) 664-670
- 12 Fujimoto E, Sumen Y, Deie M, Yasumoto M, Kobayashi K, Ochi M. Anterior cruciate ligament graft impingement against the posterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis using MRI plus three-dimensional reconstruction software. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22 (08) 1125-1129
- 13 Iriuchishima T, Tajima G, Ingham SJ, Shen W, Smolinski P, Fu FH. Impingement pressure in the anatomical and nonanatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (08) 1611-1617
- 14 Iriuchishima T, Tajima G, Ingham SJ, Shirakura K, Fu FH. PCL to graft impingement pressure after anatomical or non-anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (05) 964-969
- 15 Strobel MJ, Castillo RJ, Weiler A. Reflex extension loss after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction due to femoral “high noon” graft placement. Arthroscopy 2001; 17 (04) 408-411
- 16 Beaulieu ML, Wojtys EM, Ashton-Miller JA. Risk of anterior cruciate ligament fatigue failure is increased by limited internal femoral rotation during in vitro repeated pivot landings. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (09) 2233-2241
- 17 Schützenberger S, Grabner S, Schallmayer D, Kontic D, Keller F, Fialka C. The risk of graft impingement still exists in modern ACL surgery and correlates with degenerative MRI signal changes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29 (09) 2880-2888
- 18 Grassi A, Bailey JR, Signorelli C. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a practical guide. World J Orthop 2016; 7 (10) 638-649
- 19 Honda Y. Some characteristics of the C-wave of ERGs recorded by a pair of electrodes on the cornea and sclera. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1977; 202 (01) 19-26
- 20 van der List JP, DiFelice GS. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predicts eligibility for arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (02) 660-671
- 21 Mishima S, Takahashi S, Kondo S, Ishiguro N. Anterior tibial subluxation in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: quantification using magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (10) 1193-1196
- 22 Kakigi T, Sakamoto R, Tagawa H. et al. Diagnostic advantage of thin slice 2D MRI and multiplanar reconstruction of the knee joint using deep learning based denoising approach. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 10362
- 23 Numkarunarunrote N, Chaitusaney T. Anterior tibial translation sign: factors affecting interpretation of anterior cruciate ligament tear. J Med Assoc Thai 2015; 98 (Suppl. 01) S57-S62
- 24 Ni QK, Song GY, Zhang ZJ. et al. Steep posterior tibial slope and excessive anterior tibial translation are predictive risk factors of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure: a case-control study with prospectively collected data. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (12) 2954-2961
- 25 Vignos MF, Smith CR, Roth JD. et al. Anterior cruciate ligament graft tunnel placement and graft angle are primary determinants of internal knee mechanics after reconstructive surgery. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (14) 3503-3514
- 26 Yaru NC, Daniel DM, Penner D. The effect of tibial attachment site on graft impingement in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1992; 20 (02) 217-220
- 27 Ranuccio F, Familiari F, Tedesco G, La Camera F, Gasparini G. Effects of notchplasty on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Joints 2017; 5 (03) 173-179
- 28 Manderle BJ, Beletsky A, Gorodischer T. et al. Transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: tips for a successful anatomic reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech 2021; 10 (12) e2783-e2788
- 29 Fu FH, van Eck CF, Tashman S, Irrgang JJ, Moreland MS. Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a changing paradigm. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (03) 640-648
- 30 Yavari E, Moosa S, Cohen D. et al. Technology-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improves tunnel placement but leads to no change in clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31 (10) 4299-4311
- 31 Mauch F, Apic G, Becker U, Bauer G. Differences in the placement of the tibial tunnel during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with and without computer-assisted navigation. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (11) 1824-1832
- 32 Song GY, Ni QK, Zheng T, Feng H, Zhang ZJ, Zhang H. Increased posterior tibial slope is associated with greater risk of graft roof impingement after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49 (09) 2396-2405
- 33 Song GY, Zhang H, Zhang J, Zhang ZJ, Zheng T, Feng H. Excessive preoperative anterior tibial subluxation in extension is associated with inferior knee stability after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (03) 573-580
- 34 Hinz M, Brunner M, Winkler PW. et al. The posterior tibial slope is not associated with graft failure and functional outcomes after anatomic primary isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51 (14) 3670-3676
- 35 Wilson R, Barhorst AA. Intercondylar notch impingement of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cadaveric in vitro study using robots. J Healthc Eng 2018; 2018: 8698167
- 36 Bents RT, Jones RC, May DA, Snearly WS. Intercondylar notch encroachment following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study. Am J Knee Surg 1998; 11 (02) 81-88
- 37 May DA, Snearly WN, Bents R, Jones R. MR imaging findings in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of notchplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169 (01) 217-222