RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2688-3992
Perspectives of Spanish-Speaking Caregivers on Pediatric Patient Portal Use
Authors
Funding This study was supported by the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health and the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Abstract
Objectives
Disparities exist in patient portal use among non-English-speaking caregivers of pediatric patients. This study aims to evaluate the reasons behind Spanish-speaking caregivers' use of patient portals and identify facilitators and barriers, focusing on those caring for children with chronic conditions.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured interviews and surveys with Spanish-speaking caregivers of pediatric patients with chronic conditions at an academic pediatric health network in California. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Results
Twenty caregivers participated. Participants primarily accessed patient portals via their smartphones, and most accessed the patient portal at least weekly. Three main themes emerged: perceived benefits (managing appointments, medications, and results), facilitators that improved use (support from healthcare professionals), and barriers that negatively affected use (differences in language, health literacy, and digital health literacy).
Conclusion
Spanish-speaking caregivers find patient portals beneficial but face significant barriers related to language discordance and differences in health literacy and digital health literacy. This study highlights the need for health systems to provide language concordance within patient portals and consider innovative solutions that promote equitable use.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of Stanford University's Institutional Review Board (IRB) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by Stanford's IRB (approval number: 68346).
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 23. April 2025
Angenommen: 12. August 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
22. August 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Oktober 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Alturkistani A, Greenfield G, Greaves F, Aliabadi S, Jenkins RH, Costelloe C. Patient portal functionalities and uptake: systematic review protocol. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9 (07) e14975
- 2 Sarabu C, Lee T, Hogan A, Pageler N. The value of OpenNotes for pediatric patients, their families and impact on the patient-physician relationship. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (01) 76-81
- 3 Bell SK, Mejilla R, Anselmo M. et al. When doctors share visit notes with patients: a study of patient and doctor perceptions of documentation errors, safety opportunities and the patient-doctor relationship. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26 (04) 262-270
- 4 Walker J, Leveille S, Bell S. et al. OpenNotes after 7 years: patient experiences with ongoing access to their clinicians' outpatient visit notes. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (05) e13876
- 5 Gerard M, Chimowitz H, Fossa A, Bourgeois F, Fernandez L, Bell SK. The importance of visit notes on patient portals for engaging less educated or nonwhite patients: survey study. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (05) e191
- 6 Grossman LV, Masterson Creber RM, Benda NC, Wright D, Vawdrey DK, Ancker JS. Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (8-9): 855-870
- 7 Flower KB, Wurzelmann S, Tucker C, Rojas C, Díaz-González de Ferris ME, Sylvester F. Spanish-speaking parents' experiences accessing academic medical center care: barriers, facilitators and technology use. Acad Pediatr 2021; 21 (05) 793-801
- 8 Peacock S, Reddy A, Leveille SG. et al. Patient portals and personal health information online: perception, access, and use by US adults. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (e1): e173-e177
- 9 Richardson S, Lawrence K, Schoenthaler AM, Mann D. A framework for digital health equity. Digit Med 2022; 5 (01) 1-6
- 10 Seidel E, Cortes T, Chong C. . Digital Health Literacy. Digital Health Literacy. Published online August 30, 2023. Accessed July 10, 2025 at: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/digital-health-literacy
- 11 Localio AM, Klusaritz H, Morales KH, Ruggieri DG, Han X, Apter AJ. Primary language and the electronic health record patient portal: barriers to use among Spanish-speaking adults with asthma. J Asthma 2022; 59 (10) 2081-2090
- 12 Higashi RT, Thakur B, Repasky EC. et al. Digital health technology use among Spanish speakers in the US: a scoping review. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8 (05) e2510386
- 13 Sieck CJ, Sheon A, Ancker JS, Castek J, Callahan B, Siefer A. Digital inclusion as a social determinant of health. NPJ Digit Med 2021; 4 (01) 52
- 14 Lee HY, Jin SW, Henning-Smith C, Lee J, Lee J. Role of health literacy in health-related information-seeking behavior online: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23 (01) e14088
- 15 Reed M, Millman A, Fireman B. et al. Use of Patient Portals by People with Long-Term Health Problems [Internet]. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2019
- 16 Kruse CS, Argueta DA, Lopez L, Nair A. Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (02) e40
- 17 Chronic Conditions | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Accessed December 4, 2022 at: https://www.ahrq.gov/topics/chronic-conditions.html
- 18 Tom JO, Mangione-Smith R, Solomon C, Grossman DC. Integrated personal health record use: association with parent-reported care experiences. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (01) e183-e190
- 19 Bureau UC. Language Spoken at Home. Census.gov. Accessed December 9, 2024 at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/
- 20 MyChart | Powered by Epic. Accessed February 4, 2024 at: https://www.mychart.org/
- 21 Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med 2022; 292: 114523
- 22 Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19 (06) 349-357
- 23 Casillas A, Perez-Aguilar G, Abhat A. et al. Su salud a la mano (your health at hand): patient perceptions about a bilingual patient portal in the Los Angeles safety net. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (12) 1525-1535
- 24 Kelly MM, Thurber AS, Coller RJ. et al. Parent perceptions of real-time access to their hospitalized child's medical records using an inpatient portal: a qualitative study. Hosp Pediatr 2019; 9 (04) 273-280
- 25 Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manage Inf Syst Q 1989; 13 (03) 319-340
- 26 Strawley C, Richwine C. Individuals' Access and Use of Patient Portals and Smartphone Health Apps. In: ASTP Health IT Data Brief [Internet]. Washington (DC): Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy; 2023. (69)
- 27 Nelson LA, Pennings JS, Sommer EC, Popescu F, Barkin SLA. A 3-item measure of digital health care literacy: development and validation study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6 (04) e36043
- 28 Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach 2020; 42 (08) 846-854
- 29 Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, Kahlke R. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Med Teach 2022; 0 (00) 1-11
- 30 Szilagyi PG, Valderrama R, Vangala S. et al. Pediatric patient portal use in one health system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (03) 444-448
- 31 Bureau UC. Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2021. Census.gov. Accessed October 17, 2024 at: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2024/acs/acs-56.html
- 32 Internet BFS. Pew Research Center. January 31, 2024. Accessed October 17, 2024 at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/
- 33 Steitz B, Cronin RM, Davis SE, Yan E, Jackson GP. Long-term patterns of patient portal use for pediatric patients at an academic medical center. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (03) 779-793
- 34 Sarabu C, Pageler N, Bourgeois F. OpenNotes: toward a participatory pediatric health system. Pediatrics 2018; 142 (04) e20180601
- 35 Sarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY. et al. Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (03) 318-321
- 36 Pageler NM, Webber EC, Lund DP. Implications of the 21st Century Cures Act in pediatrics. Pediatrics 2021; 147 (03) e2020034199
- 37 Khoong EC, Steinbrook E, Brown C, Fernandez A. Assessing the use of Google translate for Spanish and Chinese translations of emergency department discharge instructions. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179 (04) 580-582
- 38 Brewster RCL, Gonzalez P, Khazanchi R. et al. Performance of ChatGPT and Google translate for pediatric discharge instruction translation. Pediatrics 2024; 154 (01) e2023065573
- 39 Ray M, Kats DJ, Moorkens J. et al. Evaluating a large language model in translating patient instructions to Spanish using a standardized framework. JAMA Pediatr 2025; e251729
- 40 Ebby CG, Tse G, Bethel J, Zhao Q, Gerber DM, Kelly MM. Large language models to summarize pediatric admission notes into plain language. Pediatrics 2025; 155 (06) e2024069515
- 41 Hopwood CJ, Flato CG, Ambwani S, Garland BH, Morey LC. A comparison of Latino and Anglo socially desirable responding. J Clin Psychol 2009; 65 (07) 769-780