Short Scar Male Neck Lift: A Minimally Invasive Option for Neck Contouring

Abstract

Aims and Backgrounds

While facelift literature has largely focused on female patients, recent research highlights unique anatomical and psychosocial considerations in male facial rejuvenation. The short scar neck lift is explored to present the indications, technique, and outcomes as an alternative to the deep plane facelift in selected male patients.

Techniques

The short scar neck lift employs limited periauricular incisions to address submental fullness, platysmal banding, and mild-to-moderate cervical skin laxity. Ideal candidates demonstrate localized cervical and mandibular aging without significant midface descent. The procedure may be combined with submental liposuction, platysmaplasty, and energy-based devices to enhance skin contraction.

Conclusion and Clinical Relevance

In appropriately selected patients, the short scar neck lift achieves meaningful improvement in cervicomental angle definition with reduced operative time, morbidity, and recovery compared with deep plane facelifts. The short scar neck lift is a versatile, lower-morbidity alternative for male patients with localized cervical aging. Its targeted approach, adaptability, and favorable recovery profile make it a valuable addition to the male facial rejuvenation surgical algorithm.

Keywords

neck lift - radiofrequency - jawline - skin tightening

Publication History

Received: 01 September 2025

Accepted: 04 September 2025

Article published online:
17 September 2025

• References

• 1 Giacomoni PU, Mammone T, Teri M. Gender-linked differences in human skin. J Dermatol Sci 2009; 55 (03) 144-149
• 2 Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Baker TM. Refinements in face lifting: enhanced facial contour using vicryl mesh incorporated into SMAS fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (01) 290-301
• 3 Owsley JQ, Fiala TG. Update: Lifting the malar fat pad for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (03) 715-722
• 4 Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (01) 53-61 , discussion 62–63
• 5 Handler MZ, Goldberg DJ. Cosmetic concerns among men. Dermatol Clin 2018; 36 (01) 5-10
• 6 Feldman JJ. Corset platysmaplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19 (02) 369-382
• 7 LaFerriere KA, Paik YS. Complete corset platysmaplasty: Evolution of addressing the aging neck. Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30 (04) 431-437
• 8 Talei B, Shauly O, Marxen T, Menon A, Gould DJ. The mastoid crevasse and 3-dimensional considerations in deep plane neck lifting. Aesthet Surg J 2024; 44 (02) NP132-NP148
• 9 Wu DC, Liolios A, Mahoney L, Guiha I, Goldman MP. Subdermal radiofrequency for skin tightening of the posterior upper arms. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (09) 1089-1093
• 10 Locketz GD, Bloom JD. Percutaneous radiofrequency technologies for the lower face and neck. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2019; 27 (03) 305-320
• 11 Gentile RD. Renuvion/J-Plasma for subdermal skin tightening facial contouring and skin rejuvenation of the face and neck. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2019; 27 (03) 273-290
• 12 SofWave. SofWave. July 11, 2023. Accessed September 5, 2025 at: https://sofwave.com/patients/about-us/
• 13 Meade RA, Teotia SS, Griffeth LK, Barton FE. Facelift and patterns of lymphatic drainage. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32 (01) 39-45
• 14 Mottura AA. Face lift postoperative recovery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002; 26 (03) 172-180
• 15 Yamada N, Toyoda I, Ogura S. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the management of severe soft tissue injuries. In: Shinomiya N, Asai Y. eds. Hyperbaric Oxygenation Therapy. Springer; 2020: 81-104
• 16 Neel OF, Mousa AH, Al-Terkawi RA, Bakr MM, Mortada H. Assessing the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on facelift outcomes: A case-control study comparing outcomes in patients with and without hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 2023; 5: ojad065
• 17 Sadick N, Sorhaindo L. The radiofrequency frontier: a review of radiofrequency and combined radiofrequency pulsed-light technology in aesthetic medicine. Facial Plast Surg 2005; 21 (02) 131-138