Simultaneous Microsurgery During Bilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction Reduces Ischemia Time Without Increasing Complications

Jacquelyn M. Roth; Maxwell Godek; Jamie Frost; Bernice Yu; Ethan Fung; Hani Sbitany; Jordan M. S. Jacobs; Steven M. Sultan; Rebecca Suydam; Peter W. Henderson

doi:10.1055/a-2702-4108

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Table of Contents

J Reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2702-4108

Original Article

Simultaneous Microsurgery During Bilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction Reduces Ischemia Time Without Increasing Complications

Authors

Jacquelyn M. Roth

¹Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
Maxwell Godek

¹Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
Jamie Frost

¹Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
Bernice Yu

¹Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
Ethan Fung

¹Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
Hani Sbitany

¹Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
Jordan M. S. Jacobs

¹Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
Steven M. Sultan

¹Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
Rebecca Suydam

¹Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
Peter W. Henderson

¹Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States

Abstract

Background

In bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction procedures, the microsurgical anastomoses are usually performed consecutively, where one side is completed before the other side is started. However, when a co-surgeon model and loupe magnification are used, it is possible to perform both sides simultaneously. This study assesses the implications of simultaneous versus consecutive microsurgery on ischemia time and postoperative outcomes in bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted on bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction patients between 2017 and 2023. Ischemia time was used to categorize the microsurgical anastomosis, with an overlap of 10 or more minutes between sides classified as “simultaneous microsurgery,” and an overlap of less than 10 minutes classified as “consecutive microsurgery.” Data were collected on patient demographics, total ischemia time (total time when one or both sides of the abdomen were undergoing microsurgical anastomoses), total operating time, postoperative complications, 90-day postoperative events, hospital length of stay (LOS), and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) required for pain management. Regression analyses assessed the impact of simultaneous versus consecutive microsurgery on key outcomes. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Seventy-four patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Thirty-one (42%) had undergone simultaneous microsurgery, and 43 (58%) had undergone consecutive microsurgery. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, body mass index (BMI), race, ethnicity, or baseline comorbidities. Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction in total ischemia time associated with simultaneous microsurgery (111 minutes vs. 147 minutes; p < 0.001), and no differences in total operating time, complications, 90-day postoperative events, LOS, or MME. These findings were unchanged on multivariate regression controlling for age, BMI, comorbidities, and flap weight.

Conclusion

Simultaneous microsurgery during bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction significantly reduces total ischemia time without increasing complications, hospital LOS, or pain management requirements.

Keywords

loupes - simultaneous - ischemia time

Full Text

References

References
1 Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC. et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (05) 1014-1025 , discussion 1026–1027
2 Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36 (15) 1938-1943
3 Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES, Allen RJ. Breast reconstruction using perforator flaps. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94 (06) 441-454
4 Fijany AJ, Zago I, Olsson SE. et al. Recent trends and future directions for the integrated plastic surgery match. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11 (06) e5053
5 Egeberg A, Rasmussen MK, Sørensen JA. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (11) 1474-1480
6 Stefura T, Rusinek J, Wątor J. et al. Implant vs. autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies comparing surgical approaches in 55,455 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 77: 346-358
7 Brinkman JN, Timman R, Gopie JP, Kleijne A, Tibben A, Mureau MAM. Aesthetic outcome after implant and DIEP flap breast reconstruction: an exploratory, prospective comparison of 25 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (07) 1018-1019
8 Edsander-Nord Å, Assareh A, Halle M, Skogh AD. Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in irradiated patients: a 12-year follow-up of deep inferior epigastric perforator and latissimus dorsi flap outcomes. JPRAS Open 2024; 42: 361-369
9 Wu Y, Li D, Vermund SH. Advantages and limitations of the body mass index (BMI) to assess adult obesity. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2024; 21 (06) 757
10 Heidekrueger PI, Fritschen U, Moellhoff N. et al. Impact of body mass index on free DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a multicenter cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (08) 1718-1724
11 Ross DA, Ariyan S, Restifo R, Sasaki CT. Use of the operating microscope and loupes for head and neck free microvascular tissue transfer: a retrospective comparison. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129 (02) 189-193
12 Wormald JCR, Wade RG, Figus A. The increased risk of adverse outcomes in bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction compared to unilateral reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (02) 143-156
13 Wade RG, Watford J, Wormald JCR, Bramhall RJ, Figus A. Perforator mapping reduces the operative time of DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (04) 468-477
14 Laurent R, Schoucair R, Danino MA. DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: a morbidity study of bilateral versus unilateral reconstruction. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2023; 68 (04) 300-307
15 Arellano JA, Comerci AJ, Liu HY. et al. Complications in prolonged intraoperative ischemia time in free flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2025; 49 (05) 1262-1270
16 Marre D, Hontanilla B. Increments in ischaemia time induces microvascular complications in the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (01) 80-86
17 Hillberg NS, Beugels J, van Kuijk SMJ, van der Hulst RRJW, Tuinder SMH. Increase of major complications with a longer ischemia time in breast reconstruction with a free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Eur J Plast Surg 2020; 43 (02) 133-138
18 Pannucci CJ, Basta MN, Kovach SJ, Kanchwala SK, Wu LC, Serletti JM. Loupes-only microsurgery is a safe alternative to the operating microscope: an analysis of 1,649 consecutive free flap breast reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (09) 636-642
19 Serletti JM, Deuber MA, Guidera PM. et al. Comparison of the operating microscope and loupes for free microvascular tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95 (02) 270-276
20 Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Efficient DIEP flap: bilateral breast reconstruction in less than four hours. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (09) e3801
21 Xu J, Zhu XM, Ng KC, Alhefzi MM, Avram R, Coroneos CJ. Co-surgeon versus single-surgeon outcomes in free tissue breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (08) 589-600
22 Giannas E, Alba B, Harmon K. et al. The co-surgeon model for microsurgical free flaps: a survey of perspectives and utility. J Reconstr Microsurg 2025;
23 Porter BE, Anderson TC, Ash AS, Langsdon SE, Zelle LM, Willson TD. Impact of resident and attending surgeon training level on free tissue transfer ischemia time and complications. J Reconstr Microsurg 2025; 41 (05) 443-449