RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2705-3478
Autologous Fat Grafting of the Face in Men
Authors

Abstract
Aim and Background
Men have distinct facial anatomy and facial patterns. Autologous fat grafting techniques can be tailored to maintain masculine features.
Historical Aspects
Interest in male facial rejuvenation has grown in recent decades. Autologous fat grafting is favored for its natural, durable results and regenerative benefits.
Anatomy
Men have angular facial structures with prominent brows, wider jaws, and thinner fat layers. Aging leads to forehead rhytids, midface hollowing, nasal lengthening, jawline blunting, and a more rectangular profile due to bone loss and skin laxity.
Patient Selection
Thorough preoperative evaluation and facial analysis are important for successful planning and outcomes.
Techniques
There are various commercially available tools for fat harvesting and processing. The Tulip cannula and PureGraft systems are described in this article. Microfat (1,000–1,500 microns) is preferred in facial grafting for its balance of volume restoration and low nodularity risk. The brow, infraorbital region, midface, jawline, and chin can be targeted to restore a youthful, masculine contour.
Current and Future Development
Research on male-specific outcomes, including hormonal and weight effects on graft longevity and patient-reported outcomes, is limited and is an area ripe for future investigation.
Conclusion and Clinical Relevance
As interest in male aesthetics increases, tailoring facial rejuvenation techniques to their anatomy and aging is essential for successful outcomes.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 04. September 2025
Angenommen: 19. September 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
19. September 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
30. September 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Cohen SR, Wesson J, Mora A. Chapter 23 Dermal fillers and facial fat grafting in males. In: Thaller SR, Cohen MN. eds. A Comprehensive Guide to Male Aesthetic and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. Springer; 2024: 215-226
- 2 Aesthetic Plastic Surgery National Databank Statistics 2023. Aesthet Surg J 2024; 44 (suppl_2): 1-25
- 3 Bannister JJ, Juszczak H, Aponte JD. et al. Sex differences in adult facial three-dimensional morphology: application to gender-affirming facial surgery. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2022; 24 (S2): S24-S30
- 4 Mydlová M, Dupej J, Koudelová J, Velemínská J. Sexual dimorphism of facial appearance in ageing human adults: a cross-sectional study. Forensic Sci Int 2015; 257: 519.e1-519.e9
- 5 Mendelson B, Wong CH. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36 (04) 753-760
- 6 de Maio M. Ethnic and gender considerations in the use of facial injectables: male patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (5, suppl): 40S-43S
- 7 Straughan DM, Yaremchuk MJ. Improving male chin and mandible eesthetics. Clin Plast Surg 2022; 49 (02) 275-283
- 8 Schultz KP, Raghuram A, Davis MJ, Abu-Ghname A, Chamata E, Rohrich RJ. Fat grafting for facial rejuvenation. Semin Plast Surg 2020; 34 (01) 30-37
- 9 Padoin AV, Braga-Silva J, Martins P. et al. Sources of processed lipoaspirate cells: influence of donor site on cell concentration. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (02) 614-618
- 10 Strong AL, Rohrich RJ, Tonnard PL, Vargo JD, Cederna PS. Technical precision with autologous fat grafting for facial rejuvenation: a review of the evolving science. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153 (02) 360-377
- 11 Yildiz K, Taşli PN, Şahin F, Güneren E. Comparison of cellular alterations in fat cells harvested with laser-assisted liposuction and suction-assisted liposuction. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (03) 631-635
- 12 Crawford JL, Hubbard BA, Colbert SH, Puckett CL. Fine tuning lipoaspirate viability for fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (04) 1342-1348
- 13 Scott BL, Randall N, Wang T, Loyo M. Autologous fat grafting in facial cosmetic surgery: a national survey. Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37 (01) 136-138
- 14 Shauly O, Gould DJ, Ghavami A. Fat grafting: basic science, techniques, and patient management. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (03) e3987
- 15 Cucchiani R, Corrales L. The effects of fat harvesting and preparation, air exposure, obesity, and stem cell enrichment on adipocyte viability prior to graft transplantation. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (10) 1164-1173
- 16 Hoareau L, Bencharif K, Girard AC. et al. Effect of centrifugation and washing on adipose graft viability: a new method to improve graft efficiency. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (05) 712-719
- 17 Fang C, Patel P, Li H. et al. Physical, biochemical, and biologic properties of fat graft processed via different methods. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (08) e3010
- 18 Chen X, Hong S, Hong F, Yang B, Tong C, Zhang J. Mechanical emulsification of lipoaspirate by different Luer-Lok connector changes the viability of adipose derived stem cells in Nanofat. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2020; 54 (06) 344-351
- 19 Nikolis A, Frank K, Guryanov R. et al. Differences in temporal volume between males and females and the influence of age and BMI: a cross-sectional CT-imaging study. Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37 (05) 632-638
- 20 Deane EC, Wong A, Bloom JD. Fat grafting the male face. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2024; 32 (03) 391-398
- 21 Somenek M, Romero NJ. Facial analysis for gender affirmation/gender-related facial analysis. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2023; 31 (03) 341-348
- 22 Coleman SR. Chapter 14 Facial Fat Grafting in Men. In: Steinbrech D. ed. Male Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Thieme Publishers; 2021: 143-185
- 23 Tzikas TL. Fat grafting volume restoration to the brow and temporal regions. Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34 (02) 164-172
- 24 Villavisanis DF, Blum JD, Liou L. et al. Real face analysis of masculinity-femininity, facial ratios, and attractiveness. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 91 (02) 287-293
- 25 Paskhover B, Durand D, Kamen E, Gordon NA. Patterns of change in facial skeletal aging. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19 (05) 413-417
- 26 Hashem AM, Couto RA, Waltzman JT, Drake RL, Zins JE. Evidence-based medicine: a graded approach to lower lid blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (01) 139e-150e
- 27 Jehoon O. Three-dimensional structure of the orbicularis retaining ligament: a micro-computed tomography and histologic study. Anat Cell Biol 2018; 51 (02) 112-120
- 28 Lambros V. Observations on periorbital and midface aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (05) 1367-1376
- 29 Schreiber JE, Stern CS, Jelks EB, Jelks GW, Tepper OM. Three-dimensional topographic surface changes in response to volumization of the lateral suborbicularis oculi fat compartment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (03) 653-659
- 30 Mogilski JK, Welling LLM. The relative contribution of jawbone and cheekbone prominence, eyebrow thickness, eye size, and face length to evaluations of facial masculinity and attractiveness: a conjoint data-driven approach. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 2428
- 31 Vazirnia A, Braz A, Fabi SG. Nonsurgical jawline rejuvenation using injectable fillers. J Cosmet Dermatol 2020; 19 (08) 1940-1947
- 32 Marten T, Elyassnia D. High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the midface, cheek, and jawline. Facial Plast Surg 2022; 38 (06) 593-612