Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2712-4349
Predictors of 2-Year PROMIS Physical Function After Primary ACL Reconstruction
Authors
Funding Information This work was supported by a grant from The James Lawrence Kernan Hospital Endowment Fund, Incorporated (BL1941007WS). This work was also supported in part by Career Development Award Number IK2 BX004879 from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory R&D (BLRD) Service.

Abstract
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a common patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument used to evaluate function, pain, satisfaction, and mental health outcomes after surgery. Predictors of 2-year PROMIS physical function (PF) after knee surgery have been previously reported; however, PROMIS PF 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to investigate associations and identify predictors of 2-year PROMIS PF after primary ACLR. A prospectively managed orthopaedic registry was queried for patients who underwent primary ACLR between 2015 and 2018. PROs were collected at baseline and 2 years postoperatively, along with self-reported socioeconomic and demographic information. Bivariate analysis was performed to identify associations between baseline characteristics and 2-year PROMIS PF. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of 2-year and 2-year improvement in PROMIS PF. Of 203 eligible patients, 141 patients (70%) completed 2-year surveys and were analyzed. Better 2-year PROMIS PF was associated with student status (p = 0.007), younger age (p = 0.026), lower body mass index (p < 0.001), and lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.023). Greater improvement in PROMIS PF at 2 years was associated with private insurance (p = 0.029) and income over $70,000 (p = 0.007). Better baseline PROs were associated with better 2-year PROMIS PF. Younger age (p = 0.003), higher income (p = 0.023), and better baseline PROMIS Fatigue (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of better 2-year PROMIS PF. Additionally, younger age (p = 0.003), higher income (p = 0.029), worse baseline PROMIS PF (p < 0.001), and better baseline PROMIS Fatigue (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of greater 2-year improvement in PROMIS PF. Age, income, and baseline PROMIS Fatigue independently predicted 2-year PROMIS PF and improvement in 2-year PROMIS PF. Though these factors are nonmodifiable, these findings may allow surgeons to more effectively counsel patients preoperatively.
Publication History
Received: 28 May 2025
Accepted: 26 September 2025
Article published online:
16 October 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
- 
            References
- 1 Montalvo AM, Schneider DK, Yut L. et al. “What's my risk of sustaining an ACL injury while playing sports?” A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2019; 53 (16) 1003-1012
- 2 Beck NA, Lawrence JTR, Nordin JD, DeFor TA, Tompkins M. ACL tears in school-aged children and adolescents over 20 years. Pediatrics 2017; 139 (03) e20161877
- 3 Wiggins AJ, Grandhi RK, Schneider DK, Stanfield D, Webster KE, Myer GD. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (07) 1861-1876
- 4 Ithurburn MP, Paterno MV, Ford KR, Hewett TE, Schmitt LC. Young athletes with quadriceps femoris strength asymmetry at return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction demonstrate asymmetric single-leg drop-landing mechanics. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (11) 2727-2737
- 5 Culliton SE, Bryant DM, Overend TJ, MacDonald SJ, Chesworth BM. The relationship between expectations and satisfaction in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (03) 490-492
- 6 Chalmers PN, Mall NA, Moric M. et al. Does ACL reconstruction alter natural history?: a systematic literature review of long-term outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (04) 292-300
- 7 Harris JD, Abrams GD, Bach BR. et al. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 2014; 37 (02) e103-e108
- 8 Getgood AMJ, Bryant DM, Litchfield R. et al; STABILITY Study Group. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduces failure of hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2-year outcomes from the STABILITY study randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (02) 285-297
- 9 Carter HM, Lewis GN, Smith BE. Preoperative predictors for return to physical activity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR): a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24 (01) 471
- 10 Arundale AJH, Cummer K, Capin JJ, Zarzycki R, Snyder-Mackler L. Report of the clinical and functional primary outcomes in men of the ACL-SPORTS trial: similar outcomes in men receiving secondary prevention with and without perturbation training 1 and 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (10) 2523-2534
- 11 Hancock KJ, Glass N, Anthony CA. et al. Performance of PROMIS for healthy patients undergoing meniscal surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (11) 954-958
- 12 Brodke DJ, Saltzman CL, Brodke DS. PROMIS for orthopaedic outcomes measurement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016; 24 (11) 744-749
- 13 Porter RS, Holt K, Ramchandran RS. Implementation of PROMIS in an optometry clinic. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2021; 12: 307-312
- 14 Gregory JJ, Werth PM, Reilly CA, Jevsevar DS. Cross-specialty PROMIS-global health differential item functioning. Qual Life Res 2021; 30 (08) 2339-2348
- 15 Myhre L, Kellam P, Dekeyser G. et al. Minimal clinically important differences of PROMIS PF in ankle fracture patients. Foot Ankle Int 2022; 43 (07) 968-972
- 16 Brodke DS, Goz V, Voss MW, Lawrence BD, Spiker WR, Hung M. PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 physical function domain in spine patients. Spine 2017; 42 (12) 921-929
- 17 Baron JE, Duchman KR, Wolf BR, Westermann RW. PROMIS is a valid patient-reported outcome measure for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with multi-ligament knee reconstruction and repair procedures. Knee 2021; 28: 294-299
- 18 Hancock KJ, Glass N, Anthony CA. et al. PROMIS: a valid and efficient outcomes instrument for patients with ACL tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (01) 100-104
- 19 Robins RJ, Anderson MB, Zhang Y, Presson AP, Burks RT, Greis PE. Convergent validity of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system's physical function computerized adaptive test for the knee and shoulder injury sports medicine patient population. Arthroscopy 2017; 33 (03) 608-616
- 20 Miles M, Nadarajah V, Jauregui JJ. et al. Evaluation of the PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test in Patients Undergoing Knee Surgery. J Knee Surg 2020; 33 (08) 810-817
- 21 Scott EJ, Westermann R, Glass NA, Hettrich C, Wolf BR, Bollier MJ. Performance of the PROMIS in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6 (05) 2325967118774509
- 22 Chen RE, Papuga MO, Voloshin I. et al. Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative outcomes after primary ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6 (05) 2325967118771286
- 23 Gulledge CM, Koolmees D, Smith DG. et al. The PROMIS CAT demonstrates responsiveness in patients after ACL reconstruction across numerous health domains. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9 (01) 2325967120979991
- 24 Hunt D, Zhang T, Koenig S. et al. Predictors of PROMIS physical function at 2 years following knee surgery. J Knee Surg 2022; 35 (05) 521-528
- 25 Henn III RF, Dubina AG, Jauregui JJ, Smuda MP, Tracy JK. The Maryland Orthopaedic Registry (MOR): design and baseline characteristics of a prospective registry. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2017; 8 (04) 301-307
- 26 Cook KF, Jensen SE, Schalet BD. et al. PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 73: 89-102
- 27 Amtmann D, Cook KF, Jensen MP. et al. Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain 2010; 150 (01) 173-182
- 28 Farrar JT, Young Jr JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94 (02) 149-158
- 29 Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL. et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (05) 600-613
- 30 Saleh KJ, Bershadsky B, Cheng E, Kane R. Lessons learned from the hip and knee musculoskeletal outcomes data evaluation and management system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (429) 272-278
- 31 Zywiel MG, Mahomed A, Gandhi R, Perruccio AV, Mahomed NN. Measuring expectations in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (11) 3446-3456
- 32 Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (198) 43-49
- 33 Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (02) 213-218
- 34 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
- 35 Yedulla NR, Tramer JS, Koolmees DS. et al. Preoperative patient-reported outcomes measurement information system computerized adaptive testing (PROMIS CAT) scores predict achievement of minimum clinically important difference following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an anchor-based methodology. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3 (06) e1891-e1898
- 36 Barber FA, Aziz-Jacobo J, Oro FB. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon allograft: an age-dependent outcome evaluation. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (04) 488-493
- 37 Webster KE, Feller JA. Younger patients and men achieve higher outcome scores than older patients and women after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (10) 2472-2480
- 38 Bjornsen E, Lisee C, Schwartz TA. et al. Improvement trajectories in patient-reported outcomes between males and females after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train 2023; 58 (05) 430-436
- 39 Kiani SN, England P, Gornitzky AL, Renjilian CB, Williams BA, Ganley TJ. Disparate impact: how does social deprivation affect patient-reported outcomes after ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents?. J Pediatr Orthop 2023; 43 (09) 543-548
- 40 Ziedas A, Castle JP, Abed V. et al. Associating social determinants of health with PROMIS CAT scores and health care utilization after ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11 (01) 23 259671221139350
- 41 Randsborg PH, Cepeda N, Adamec D, Rodeo SA, Ranawat A, Pearle AD. Patient-reported outcome, return to sport, and revision rates 7-9 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from a cohort of 2042 patients. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50 (02) 423-432
- 42 Kendall R, Wagner B, Brodke D. et al. The relationship of PROMIS pain interference and physical function scales. Pain Med 2018; 19 (09) 1720-1724
- 43 Christodoulou C, Junghaenel DU, DeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Stone AA. Cognitive interviewing in the evaluation of fatigue items: results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Qual Life Res 2008; 17 (10) 1239-1246
 
    